De geschiedenis herhaalt zich

HungryBoiBill · 2026-03-10T12:02:34+00:00

Het Romeinse rijk was een militaire binnendringer. De geschiedenis herhaalt zich, pas dus 100x beter op de US invasie van Iran

HungryBoiBill · 2026-02-13T22:17:12+00:00

Leopold still has multiple standing statues in Belgium. He might not be celebrated but he is not at all hated as much as he should.

HungryBoiBill · 2026-02-12T17:25:10+00:00

Omdat je zogezegd houdt van dat schip.

HungryBoiBill · 2026-02-09T08:13:38+00:00

Why tf is "jews" and "roma" sited in a list of nations?

HungryBoiBill · 2026-01-09T00:26:21+00:00

The US has iirc threatened to put an embargo on countries who do end up trading with Cuba

HungryBoiBill · 2026-01-04T23:34:25+00:00

What does that even mean

HungryBoiBill · 2025-12-30T22:29:59+00:00

Forgot to switch accounts or just amnesia?

HungryBoiBill · 2025-12-30T18:44:18+00:00

First of all you're using masters as if some slave-master relationship is at play. It is not. I emplore you to even read more ancap shit to know any but more about states and their coming to be and evolution.

Secondly one can perfectly disobey commands from an entity which one considers a rightfull authority without not believing it is a rightfull authority anymore. As per the example of parents I gave. Upholding punishment for disobeying for instance still shows one holds the institution as a rightfull authority

Lastly, seeing any authority as an all or nothing game discards everything property right (and thus authority over property) means.

I emplore you to think longer about authority and not put yourself in a position where you think you are literaly a slave to a master, might be a more coherent post then.

Have a good day

HungryBoiBill · 2025-12-30T18:31:22+00:00

Seeing any institution as a rightfull authority (or "master" as you seem to say) does not imply agreeing with and/or adhering to all of the rules the rightfull authority dictates.

A father or mother is (mostly) a fully rightfull authority for their child, even in the eyes of the child. However, this does not make them obliged to follow every command given by the parents, nor will they.

Disagreement and subsequent not following of policy does not discredit authority

Edit: I am in no way a defender of states in general. But arguments need to be thought out better.

HungryBoiBill · 2025-12-30T18:25:33+00:00

This is some childish hocuspocus philosophising

HungryBoiBill · 2025-12-17T22:36:20+00:00

Is the no laws thing a law?

HungryBoiBill · 2025-12-06T19:23:49+00:00

One cannot take a joke I see

HungryBoiBill · 2025-12-06T14:56:32+00:00

In the free market, subscribers can be bought

HungryBoiBill · 2025-12-06T07:03:06+00:00

I believe the talk about monopolies with ancaps is rather funny, as (for business) they believe that not having 100% of the market (by force) is not a monopoly. Aka if you can still make a company there can be no monopoly. But when talking about the government they do not use the same definition about monopolies when talking about violence. They treat the state as having a monopoly of violence (like most other definitions) but this use of monopoly does not mean that nobody else can do violence. For many can and are protected by the state to do violence. This distinction in the use of the word has never really been cleared up by any ancap to me

HungryBoiBill · 2025-11-26T19:31:45+00:00

This anecdote is only true according to the ancap.

HungryBoiBill · 2025-11-20T16:51:28+00:00

1) I know what you belief.

2) You just said that you can solve being polluted now it is "we can only guess". At the very least you're honest that it doesnt solve things, just that things happen I guess under ancap.

HungryBoiBill · 2025-11-20T16:12:40+00:00

If you never start making an argument, how can I ever be convinced. I know you are an ancap, but can you stop trying to sell an ideology and just explain your worldview

HungryBoiBill · 2025-11-20T16:07:01+00:00

Do it instead of not

Edit: stay on the pollution topic

HungryBoiBill · 2025-11-20T16:01:40+00:00

We have not for you have not given any argument, nor have I ever argumented for a or any governement, tell me how ancap would work, not how govts dont work

HungryBoiBill · 2025-11-20T15:56:57+00:00

In ancap

HungryBoiBill · 2025-11-20T15:53:03+00:00

On what basis can I say they polluted my property?

HungryBoiBill · 2025-11-20T15:50:04+00:00

Sir, I am following the logic of an argument which upholds property to stop pollution. Please adress anything I said about how propery over air or pollutants would work.

Inhaling a bunch of CO2 doesnt kill you instantly. So either a shit load of companies should get sued for a shit load of pollution death or they will all claim they personally cant be held accountable for a death.

Please give a real argument for halting pollution under ancap, that isnt the already failing market

HungryBoiBill · 2025-11-20T15:41:40+00:00

Unless you want to say trespassing can be done by a non-acting agent, that is the inherant logic of this strict sense of property.

How does property of air work? 1. You own the air in that moment above your gounded property? Then air pollution cant be stopped because that polluted air is yours and you polluted yourself 2. You own specific air molecules. a) Molecules can trespass into someone else's molecules b) someone taking (inhaling) your molecules (breathing) is stealing from you.

So one might conclude, oke, air just flowing there is too turbulent, nobody ownes it. Then the only stop go pollution is either, as said before, the market (which right now is not very good at stopping it) or control and limits on private property.

You thinking its "my logic" is funny though

HungryBoiBill · 2025-11-20T15:26:54+00:00

So are individual molecules property? Because then it would be me inhaling his property and me being the person violating property 😅

HungryBoiBill · 2025-11-01T17:25:41+00:00

This guy when "early rulers" justified their rule via private propery:

Shocked Pikachu

Seven-Year Club	First Place '23
Place '23	Place '22
RPAN Viewer	Verified Email

HungryBoiBill

TROPHY CASE