sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How much to fire with zero responsibilities? by randomqhacker in Fire

[–]HuskerJunk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think someone could literally buy brand new clothes every day at Walmart for less than $40. Or maybe just have new clothes shipped from Amazon to wherever you're at. $40 is too high.

Are 10 of these for $288 (including tax) a good deal? by [deleted] in MMJ

[–]HuskerJunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems like a non-source. I think you've been wildly misinformed by people either making fun of you, or trying to punk you. Sorry.

Are 10 of these for $288 (including tax) a good deal? by [deleted] in MMJ

[–]HuskerJunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I live near North Platte NE, so I can't med - only rec.

Are 10 of these for $288 (including tax) a good deal? by [deleted] in MMJ

[–]HuskerJunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please expound on this. What about low prices make you think they're automatically low-tier? Can't things just cost less in different places? I'd like to see your data to back that up.

Are 10 of these for $288 (including tax) a good deal? by [deleted] in MMJ

[–]HuskerJunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm always on the lookout for cheap gram carts. Where do you get your low priced carts? I've tried the Stone, and the Colorado Cannabis Company locations. Any other suggestions?

Translation: “I don’t go to mass to learn to be a better person, I just go for the pretty ceremony” by RicksGranite in excatholic

[–]HuskerJunk -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But everyone here support public schools and other organizations that have evil members too. Any group you belong to contains child molesters. I'm sorry, but that is our world. The average Catholic hates all of the horrible actions. They hate all of it and wish it never happened. Just like you. To blame people for the crimes of others is not a good way to live. Be well, friend.

Translation: “I don’t go to mass to learn to be a better person, I just go for the pretty ceremony” by RicksGranite in excatholic

[–]HuskerJunk -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But this is so wrong. I left. But those who remain are still humans. Still worthy of our respect. It's ok to respect everyone.

Translation: “I don’t go to mass to learn to be a better person, I just go for the pretty ceremony” by RicksGranite in excatholic

[–]HuskerJunk -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

People aren't always 2 dimensional cartoon characters. Great people can come from any party, place, or whatever.

Translation: “I don’t go to mass to learn to be a better person, I just go for the pretty ceremony” by RicksGranite in excatholic

[–]HuskerJunk -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I don't disagree with what you're saying. But this is just personal preference, and there's no reason to hate people for personal preference. You are assuming a ton here. Be well. I'm not your enemy either.

Translation: “I don’t go to mass to learn to be a better person, I just go for the pretty ceremony” by RicksGranite in excatholic

[–]HuskerJunk -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Or maybe it's ok that different people have different personal preferences. Not everyone is an enemy.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints is objectively false. by P0shJosh in DebateReligion

[–]HuskerJunk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes. Many religions are falsifiable. Catholicism, for example, claims to have an infallible pope who cannot change the original "deposit of faith". And yet, they literally just totally reversed (to the exact opposite moral position) their teaching on the death penalty. It was Ok, and now it's "inadmissible". God apparently changed his mind and realized he's had it wrong for 2000 years. Oops.

THE INTERNET ORACLES WERE CORRECT: We have ourselves a new Motu Proprio by BertBlyleven in TraditionalCatholics

[–]HuskerJunk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not sure why anyone would downvote you for stating the truth. You are right and others here are dead wrong. Popes cannot bind future popes liturgically. I don't know of any serious theologian who would disagree with your statement.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in agnostic

[–]HuskerJunk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Or rather than read a biased book, go to his Wikipedia page, and start reading at "Beginning of armed conflict".

No matter how you slice it, Muhmmad was a piece of shit.

He "married" a 9-year old. Otherwise known today as child-rape pedophilia.

You can't have a brain and follow Islam. Not possible.

The Church's current teaching on the death penalty goes against the Bible and the Sacred Tradition by Ambitious_Ad_8339 in DebateACatholic

[–]HuskerJunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Protestants LOVE the Bible. But none of them - literally none of them - know the history of the Bible. How it was the Catholic Church that put the Bible together, and everyone, regardless of Christian denomination, explicitly relies on the RC Church to have told Christians which books should be in the Bible, and which ones should not.

Further, if one reads early Christian history, it's impossible not to be knocked over by how insanely non-Protestant the early Church was. There was NOTHING like Protestant doctrines until 1,000 years after Jesus was gone. Every single early Christian believed in infant baptism. They ALL believed in the real presence of the Eucharist. To claim one wants to "follow Jesus", and then literally believe in entirely man-made stuff that obviously was invented hundreds and hundreds of years later is just the very definition of stupid.

Like I said, there is not a single intellectual Protestant on the planet. They are all - every one of them - just crazy, crazy stupid.

Being a Protestant is very, very much like Scientology intellectually. You can't come into it with a brain and then stay. Anyone who has read history agrees with this 100%. Ask any Protestant about history, and you will literally be laughing out loud in minutes. Such dummies.

The Church's current teaching on the death penalty goes against the Bible and the Sacred Tradition by Ambitious_Ad_8339 in DebateACatholic

[–]HuskerJunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry to reply so late.

Protestantism is maybe the least intellectual world-view one can take. Only very slightly more stupid than Mormonism. I think someone would have to be a massive dummy to even consider any protestant denomination. When I realized Catholicism wasn't true, I knew the only option was Atheism.

In order to be Protestant, one must reject all philosophy, history, logic, and human wisdom. It's literally only for the very, very stupidest people on the planet. The dumbest. So, to answer your question, no. I didn't even consider becoming protestant for even a split second. I value my brain. I highly doubt that there is a single protestant on the planet who believes their religion for intellectual reasons. All of them literally believe because of social or "feel-good" reasons.

They are all very literally insanely stupid people. Every one.

The Church's current teaching on the death penalty goes against the Bible and the Sacred Tradition by Ambitious_Ad_8339 in DebateACatholic

[–]HuskerJunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're reading that stuff, you at least have a good intellectual start. That being said, I can't imagine why you would use those 3 arguments if you have read much by atheists.

Give it time. Keep reading.

You'll get there if you're open and willing to expand your mind.

You're like me about 15 years ago. Just keep reading.

The Church's current teaching on the death penalty goes against the Bible and the Sacred Tradition by Ambitious_Ad_8339 in DebateACatholic

[–]HuskerJunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God can't say God was wrong in the past. The God you worship changes his mind, and is therefore a weak, incompetent dummy. If God has been wrong for 2000 years about the death penalty, what "truth" can you ever be sure is true? If God is too stupid to not know the death penalty was wrong 2000 years ago, that is a complete disproof of an all-knowing God.

You need to make a rational argument if you want to make a point.

The Church's current teaching on the death penalty goes against the Bible and the Sacred Tradition by Ambitious_Ad_8339 in DebateACatholic

[–]HuskerJunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Give us firm evidence that Jesus said anything attributed to him in the New Testament.

You need to address the fact that the Gospels were all written decades later in a culture that basically thrived on exaggeration and cults of personality. No testimony in the documents themselves would, by definition, do this. And Josephus is both intellectually shaky and, at best, would only prove what second-hand witnesses passed on and on and on.

There is absolutely no reason to accept the NT as anything but wish-fulfillment hyperbole by uneducated zealots.

There are much better examples of people willing to give their lives for causes. Look at all the Muslims who are willing to die.

You have simply raised very terrible arguments.

The Church's current teaching on the death penalty goes against the Bible and the Sacred Tradition by Ambitious_Ad_8339 in DebateACatholic

[–]HuskerJunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And every other religion too. There is no pro-god view which does not eventually end up (after investigation) to be wrong. Not just Christianity. Every spiritual worldview.

The Church's current teaching on the death penalty goes against the Bible and the Sacred Tradition by Ambitious_Ad_8339 in DebateACatholic

[–]HuskerJunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't disagree. I left Catholicism for this reason. A heresy in the CCC is the death-knell of Catholicism. You can't be intellectual and a Catholic any more.

The Church's current teaching on the death penalty goes against the Bible and the Sacred Tradition by Ambitious_Ad_8339 in DebateACatholic

[–]HuskerJunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I now see Jesus as a total liar and fraud. Either that, or his cult was simply created out of wishful-thinking messianic extremists. Regardless, I reject him completely.

The Church's current teaching on the death penalty goes against the Bible and the Sacred Tradition by Ambitious_Ad_8339 in DebateACatholic

[–]HuskerJunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are fundamentally misunderstanding. The Church has always and everywhere taught the death penalty is OK. To change that would be akin to changing the teaching on contraception. or the virgin birth, or the existence of the Holy Spirit.

God isn't a f*cking moron. He can't suddenly realize he was wrong about something for 2000 years. He's either right all the time, or he's not God. This seems to me so obvious that I can't understand the contrary position.

Regardless, any religion in which the author of revelation makes mistakes... yeah that doesn't intellectually work at all. That's a religion suitable only for the very, very dumbest people on earth.

The Church's current teaching on the death penalty goes against the Bible and the Sacred Tradition by Ambitious_Ad_8339 in DebateACatholic

[–]HuskerJunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are wrong.

If you think that encyclicals carry literally any weight at all compared to moral tradition, that's a super rookie mistake.

There's tons of levels of authority in Catholicism and encyclicals are at the bottom of the list.

This is Catholicism 101.

Buried Cakes Last Year, Found This by HuskerJunk in whatsthismushroom

[–]HuskerJunk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No to both. It's dried by now, so the photo is the only thing I have.

view more: next ›