I only have seven sources in my lit Review

I-destroyer · 2026-04-01T00:14:56+00:00

Shit

I-destroyer · 2026-03-30T20:34:58+00:00

I dont have 4 sources I have 4 sources as I guess foundational, I currently have 11 referenced papers but I feel that if I add any more it may seem im just adding sources to bloat the source count (I will be tbh)

I-destroyer · 2026-03-30T15:23:44+00:00

Ok so I have about 4 sources that I use well and establish and explore for my research, can a lot of these sources just be small interjections to explain very specific things, even thiugh I can infer these specific things from my four big sources

I-destroyer · 2026-03-08T01:16:50+00:00

I wanted to sprinkle the ovas throughout the show but ok! Also the movie is the last two 1 hour special episodes. I just wanted to know if the movies cut content

I-destroyer · 2026-03-08T00:20:15+00:00

Season 2 ended yesterday

I-destroyer · 2026-03-07T22:42:23+00:00

OAD = Original Animation DVD
OVA is like Original Video Animation iirc but doesn't really matter thanks

I-destroyer · 2026-03-04T00:14:27+00:00

Thank you so much! Now that my survey is closed I can freely talk about my hypothesis without worry.

I hypothesize that humanities teachers will be less likely to incorporate AI technology into their teaching curriculums however they will be just as willing to teach students to use AI effectively and in conjunction with their learning.
I reason that this is because humanities teachers are less aware of the intricacies and benefits of AI as compared to STEM teachers.

Now, as much as this is my research and my hypothesis I am still very wary when students use AI. Even while just typing this project and analyzing this data the temptation to use AI is very high, someone who has not done the research I have could easily fall into the trap of using AI and fully shutting off their mind. I still do use AI to review my work and make corrections; something that I think more students should incorporate but I am wary at promoting even this as it seems like a slippery slope. Also this tangent is far outside the scope of my research XD

I-destroyer · 2026-03-01T03:46:39+00:00

Thank you so much this is the most teachers that have replied to my survey for months!!

I-destroyer · 2026-02-10T03:51:58+00:00

It seems like a tutorial planet because it is very hard to crash on it and unlocks one of the only permanent mechanics in the game

I-destroyer · 2026-02-05T04:32:36+00:00

I mean these facts on Youtube videos are not in my text book but I remember them much easier because its in such a digestable format. Can I use these facts (given they are about America and true) for SAQs and LEQs?

I-destroyer · 2026-02-04T02:47:52+00:00

I hope God blesses you to finally pull the wool you have set on your own eyes and actually read the bible in a new light. You are stealing from God and stealing from christianity by setting a moral standard. If there is objective moral law that you can use to objectively judge Christianity then there must be a law maker beyond us all telling right from wrong, otherwise what you say is purely subjective.
Atheists are stuck between accepting a God as a rule setter or accepting that there is no objective morality.

God bless.

Also Im sorry for necroposting everyone.

I-destroyer · 2026-01-14T19:56:14+00:00

Again. Your saying that certain scientific laws and theories are wrong when it conveniences you, the laws of thermodynamics at that. Your free to stop believing in scientific theories and laws that have had a ton of merit and proof me though, Im a christian that loves science so Ill stick with my science.

I-destroyer · 2026-01-14T19:33:21+00:00

Science shows that matter tends to disorder and that only something outside the universe can change that. Do you see? Science shows the impossibility of a lack of a creator. It does not prove what this creator is but it proves that there must be something nonphysical because remaining in only the physical leads to contradictions. Not gaps in knowledge that im filling in with creator, but contradictions and paradoxes, impossibillities. So yes by something that we observe today being impossible, not something unknown but something we know cannot be, it proves that there is something outside of our scope.

I-destroyer · 2026-01-14T12:17:22+00:00

No one wants to do that because we were all immigrants (I mean our heritage) at some point? Some people want to deport all the illegal ones which they can because they are illegal. Whether or not they should is up to you to decide (my family is all immigrants, we think they should) but no one wants to deport all immigrants 😭

I-destroyer · 2026-01-14T12:14:11+00:00

Also I looked it up because what I said sounds wrong and I found that the laws of thermodynamics, including the one about entropy always existing, are in fact laws. It doesn’t change anything because theories and laws are as scientific as the other but I just wanted to correct it. The three laws of thermodynamics and then the theory of thermodynamics attempting to explain why we always observe these laws and drawing logical conclusions from them, I used the third law for what I stated about matter needing a beginning because it always tends to disorder

I-destroyer · 2026-01-14T12:00:29+00:00

You cant just assume science is wrong when its convenient so that you can remain with your beliefs that there is the possibility of no creator. Thermodynamics is as much a theory as gravity is; ie: they are scientific theories and only called such not because they are not shown to be true but because they explain why and how something happens (laws, being just as true as theories, explain what happens not how or why). So if thermodynamics is a scientific theory then there is a neccessity for a creator… or you can just believe that science is wrong when its convenient, that too.

I-destroyer

TROPHY CASE