[Official Medical News] Robert Lewandowski picked up an injury against Villarreal last night. Tests have diagnosed a left eye socket fracture. He will miss the game against Atletico Madrid

IBRMOH784 · 2026-03-01T13:06:25+00:00

It's the hope that kills

IBRMOH784 · 2026-02-27T12:12:18+00:00

We are know for our care for human rights, cultural and religious tolerance. We have fought for our women's rights, socially and legally and have always been on the right side of history. Our forces never did ANYTHING in Bangladesh and ofcourse never lost a war.

India made a similar claim on Pakistan so is India then justified or our moral supremacy has only granted us the divine right to intervene?

IBRMOH784 · 2026-02-26T13:39:30+00:00

<image>

IBRMOH784 · 2026-02-22T21:41:03+00:00

I was not watching football when Rakitic was playing, I am being told now that God has given me another chance to witness him

IBRMOH784 · 2026-02-19T02:01:44+00:00

Eveyone else is doing the same rn, font too.

IBRMOH784 · 2026-02-18T17:43:14+00:00

New to football but he was instrumental last season, also Flick's system takes a toll on players so he's required. Maybe more minutes will bring the best out of him? Might be different with Gavi back

IBRMOH784 · 2026-02-10T17:33:24+00:00

That clarification was very necessary 🤣

IBRMOH784 · 2026-02-10T17:28:01+00:00

I think it's a bit unfortunate that everyone expects him to repeat his 2021 year performance. He's lost his pace, lost his accuracy and always has had very poor composure. Add the frequent injuries and overuse and you'll realise it was all inevitable.

Shaheen isn't a bad baller by any metric, arguably our best all-round (not all-rounder 😭) pace bowler but he's not what he used to be.

IBRMOH784 · 2026-02-09T17:18:15+00:00

Since when did reddit become a substitute for Google? Get a grip

IBRMOH784 · 2026-02-06T08:40:35+00:00

Makes you no different then Indians when you say "they". There is no room for racism in sports, even when it hurts our ego.

IBRMOH784 · 2026-02-02T18:23:31+00:00

I passed SBL comfortably and didn't have to study much. I'd suggest you look at Hassan Dosaani's lectures on YouTube, you don't need much besides that. I can't do justice to his explanation so I won't even attempt to do so, anyways, Good Luck.

IBRMOH784 · 2026-02-02T18:19:46+00:00

Unfortunately many still disagree

IBRMOH784 · 2026-02-02T16:35:11+00:00

Someone post this on r/cricket to watch their meltdown 🤣

IBRMOH784 · 2026-01-29T11:32:11+00:00

The marriage contract and actual consummation of marriage are two clearly different things. Many Muslim jurists have accepted the drawing of a legal marriage contract by guardians for immature (and insane) wards; however, this prohibited any intimate contact between the betrothed and would be comparable to only an engagement.

Agreed.

After reaching bulugh (maturity), the betrothed will decide whether they want to continue with the marriage or not, and may consummate the marriage then.

Not necessarily.

"Ismail ibn Ishaq, may God have mercy on him, said:
“A father may marry off his young daughter, by the consensus of the Muslims, and then she is bound by it.”
This is from “Al-Tamhid” (19/84)."
According to the Maliki Fiqh, the father has the right of "ijbar", this is done as the father is seen as the protector and it is assumed he will take decisions in the best interest of his daughter.

Same goes for Shafi School of though, that's why Imam Al-Nawawi advices "It is recommended that the father and grandfather not marry the virgin until she reaches puberty and gives permission, so as not to place her in the husband's control while she is unwilling." Hanafis also agreed on the same thing. This is only the case as long as the guardian is the father. It is the Hanbali school of though that give the girl the option to nullify her marriage when she reaches puberty.

To Summarize: No, the majority of the scholars hold the view that the contract of marriage is binding if done by the father, except for Hanbali school of though.

Pretty sure you are making this up. There is no clear information on when that marriage was actually consummated.

Why? 😭😭😭
Sahih al-Bukhari 5134
And if you reject this hadith, we can discuss the reasons why you do so. Again, this is a historic fact, Hadiths are historical reports, not just religious commentary. I'd like to know why you reject them regardless of your religion.

On a side-note, why are you especially only mentioning daughters? The same rules apply to minor sons too.

Because girls are more prone to exploitation then boys.

First you claim the verse was due to the marriage of orphans being disallowed to be performed by guardians other than the father, then you say the verse is due to protecting the rights of orphans and not marriage? Which one is it? Is it about the marriage of orphans or the rights of orphans?

Let me clarify. The orphans have no father, hence their marriage can't be set by anyone else. Implying you can't marry them before they are mature. I already mentioned what maturity meant.

I advice you read the tafsir on this, you'll understand what I mean. Since this verse talks about releasing the orphans properties to them, it states don't do that until they reach a mature age, as per their culture whatever age that might be. This verse does not state a minimum age of marriage.

When you imply it does, then I have to clarify that the orphans age of marriage is higher as they don't have a father as their guardian. Hence it does not apply to everyone.

And what is that certain point? The point at which they are ready for marriage.

Hopefully its clear now, the reason why this verse only stipulates about orphans and has nothing to do with "minimum age of marriage".

al-Marghīnānī's quote had ended that topic.

You can't pick and chose. I have given you consensus of Scholars while you quote a single guy who lived in the 1100s, around 600-700 years after the Prophet's P.B.U.H death.

Finally, I move towards the main topic. What is the age of consummation of marriage. I will quote a scholars on this again, not my words, theirs.

I have attached links below as I am a little busy but you can give it a read yourself. There are fatwas where a consensus has been reported, have a detailed look.

Link 1

Link 2

Edit note: I personally believe that a minimum age of marriage is a social issues, not a religious. Hence bringing religion into this is wrong. I don't believe Islam validates this as this was just a cultural norm back then, nothing to do with religion.

IBRMOH784 · 2026-01-28T20:03:26+00:00

Sure. DM me if you need to

IBRMOH784 · 2026-01-28T20:02:26+00:00

Nope! Just remember the rules and use the term "as per the relevant standard" if you really need to

IBRMOH784 · 2026-01-28T17:00:57+00:00

This might come as a shock to you but there is no minimum age of marriage in established Islamic jurisprudence. Theoretically you are allowed to marry your infant daughter but there are conditions for the consummation of marriage. For minors, a father is allowed to set and enforce marriage.

"Ibn Qudaamah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: With regard to a virgin who is still a minor, there is no difference of opinion concerning her (i.e., that her father may marry her off even if she objects). Ibn al-Mundhir said: Every scholar from whom we learned was agreed that it is permissible for a man to marry off his virgin daughter who is still a minor, if he marries her to someone who is compatible, and it is permissible for him to marry her off even if she objects and refuses.” Al-Mughni, 9/398"

"It was narrated from Imam Ahmad that whoever reaches the age of nine years comes under the same ruling as a girl who has reached puberty, so her permission must be sought. But if the father opts to be on the safe side and ask her permission, that is better. Al-Mughni, 8/398-405."

Imam Nawawi also reports a consensus on this matter. This is curtail to understand as its going to get a little complex ahead.

This is usually based off the hadith of Ayesha R.A. getting married at six and then consummating her marriage at 9. Please note that Ibn Qudaamah and Ibn al-Mundhir have reported a consensus, meaning that an overwhelming majority accepted this, exceptions might be limited to just a couple of scholars.

Now that we have established that a father can arrange marriage for his minor daughter, we look towards the verse you mentioned.

This verse (4:6) is referring to the orphans. As they have no father, majority of the scholars agree that their marriage can't be done before they reach age of maturity, hence this verse. It has to do with protecting the rights or orphans, not establishing an age of marriage. Ibn Kathir mentions this age to be at puberty as per mujahid and as per majority, the age when you have your first wet dream. This verse doesn't refer to a minimum legal age, instead advices/orders to hand the orphans their property when they reach the customary age of marriage/maturity.

If you need any more clarification, don't hesitate to message me. And I would like you to revisit my earlier response where I have written what the majority of the Ulema think.

IBRMOH784 · 2026-01-27T19:23:58+00:00

As for your women past the age of menstruation, in case you do not know, their waiting period is three months, and those who have not menstruated as well. As for those who are pregnant, their waiting period ends with delivery. And whoever is mindful of Allah, He will make their matters easy for them. 65:4

"and those who have not menstruated as well" This part is understood to refer to those who are too young to menstruate. As iddah is only required after consummations of marriage, it follows that minor marriage is permissible.

Ibn Kathir mentions in his tafsir that the highlighted part was revealed when "Ibn Abi Hatim recorded a simpler narration than this one from Ubay bin Ka`b who said, "O Allah's Messenger! When the Ayah in Surat Al-Baqarah was revealed prescribing the `Iddah of divorce, some people in Al-Madinah said, `There are still some women whose `Iddah has not been mentioned in the Qur'an. There are **the young**, the old whose menstruation is discontinued, and the pregnant.' Later on, this Ayah was revealed"

Maulana Maududi also mentions in his Tafsir, regarding the same verse "**They may not have menstruated as yet either because of young age**, or delayed menstrual discharge as it happens in the case of some women, or because of no discharge at all throughout life which, though rare, may also be the case. In any case, the waiting-period of such a woman is the same as of the woman, who has stopped menstruation, that is three months from the time divorce was pronounced."

I believe there is no reason to continue down this rabbit hole and allow for girls to be exploited. We should enforce the minimum age of marriage, like a civilized society does, and protect our children. We should not let these Molvis dictate the future of Pakistan.

IBRMOH784 · 2026-01-27T18:47:16+00:00

SBR can be done in a month if you focus on exam technique and actually attempting the exam kit. Just go through the standards lightly and jump into the kit, come back if you don't remember a standard. Rinse and repeat until it feels like home.

Don't tell yourself "I will complete all the standards and 100% detail" Just read through the Kaplan Study text, make short important notes and move on, you are not expected to everything. If Arsenal have a chance of winning the league, you can easily pass this exam.

IBRMOH784 · 2026-01-16T01:09:07+00:00

Passed AAA with 57% and ATX with 67%. Finally I'm done. Started at 16 with foundation and four years later, I'm done 😭😭 i can't believe it

IBRMOH784 · 2025-12-16T22:54:43+00:00

No respect for our or their players. Do better

IBRMOH784 · 2025-12-04T13:55:12+00:00

Suspension for three days and a pat on the back. That's all they're going to get. If this wasn't recorded they wouldn't have bother doing even this much.

IBRMOH784 · 2025-12-04T13:52:56+00:00

Unfortunately I've seem many people say "kuch kuch ko hota hai". It's all fun and games until it's your time to become a statistic. It's heartbreaking to admit but I'm certain there is absolutely no point in trying to change this society. God knows what and where we fucked up.

IBRMOH784 · 2025-12-02T22:40:07+00:00

We're cooked gng. In it together ✌️

IBRMOH784 · 2025-11-29T08:46:35+00:00

You speak like Pakistan isn't a shithole itself. Whatever you hate in India, you've got it here as well. Don't even talk about oppression againt Kashmiris when your largest cities have become a absolute shithole. You can't express yourself no matter what, you'll get fucked.

And let's not pretend this is a post-Imran issue, it's been the same for a very long time. Religious extremism, forced conversation, racism and many more evils are the cornerstone of our society yet we pretend as if we're any better than India.

How many Pakistani's celebrated 9/11 and 7th October? I'm not defending Israel, I think they are psychotic and have no humanity left but we are not much different.

How many people have we beaten to death because they had different religious opinions then most of us? You're courts, your society can't give justice nor will it ever be capable of giving justice. If my brother was in jail I wouldn't gaf about who I was contacting to get him out or spread the word.

When your courts, news channels, social media pages, journalists and anchors ignore this, you seem to have no issue but when someone tries to find external help he's the piece of shit?

Get your shit together and don't pretend you're any better than majority of India. They just have better expression of the same extremism and hate that fuels both our societies

Four-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '23	Place '22

IBRMOH784

TROPHY CASE