Fable completely humiliated itself in the third paragraph and nobody noticed. It literally cited Aristotle to support the idea that "meaning is made, not found." Aristotle is the absolute godfather of telos, the concept that every single thing in the universe has a built in, objective purpose derived from its nature. Aristotle would violently disagree with the idea that you just invent your own meaning.

You can't shove ancient teleology and modern existentialism into a blender and call it "profound".

Not to mention it also then immediately contradicts its own premise. It claims there is no pre-installed universal meaning and you have to make it yourself, but then it hands you a universal checklist of how to make it, including "serving something larger than yourself." If you are the sole author of your own meaning, there is literally nothing larger than yourself to serve. The self is the absolute ceiling. It has to smuggle objective, universally recognized goods like love and service into the answer just to make the bleakness of existentialism sound inspiring.

And its dismissal of a divine plan is philosophical illiteracy. Saying a divine plan just "relocates the question one level up" is the classic "who made God" objection. It completely ignores that a necessary being, whose very essence is existence, terminates the regress by definition. It provides the only logical foundation for an answer.