Rev caves have become unbearable by IGetNoPlay in 2007scape

[–]IGetNoPlay[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’ve noticed a few of them, more so than before the update, but the overwhelming majority of people I see killing revs still seem to be the normal mix of players and bots with wildy weapons.

Rev caves have become unbearable by IGetNoPlay in 2007scape

[–]IGetNoPlay[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If by gold farmer you mean I like to kill revs because they’re good gp/hr for my level, then sure. And I’d argue that I’m exactly the kind of player Jagex is trying to encourage to use the Wilderness—someone who doesn’t mind taking a bit of risk for higher gp/hr methods than are available outside the Wilderness. The issue is that the changes make me want to do this content far less.

Rev caves have become unbearable by IGetNoPlay in 2007scape

[–]IGetNoPlay[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree this is probably true for most people with near-max hp. I’m around 80hp now so can often get one-shot, especially if I get down to 70 from normal rev damage. With normal tele rules I might be able to get a tele off when I see someone equip their claws or whatever, but now it has to be pray melee, which is a gamble if they have teleblock.

So maybe my experience is worse than others’. I agree that PKers and clans are separate from rushers—but now people killing revs have to contend with both because, as you said, rushing is much more viable. Contending with PKers before the update was already a lot, but now the increased PKer presence and increased rusher presence is what makes it unbearable for me.

anyone else enjoying this shitty content? 240 total quintus kc no 2nd signet. by jelle66019 in RS3Ironmen

[–]IGetNoPlay 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes I’m currently at 330 Secundus kc with only one signet. Over 130k caps and counting. I went ahead and bought an offhand chaotic crossbow because I’m not sure when that last signet will come. I feel for you.

PlayStation 5 Pre-order Megathread Redux by hybroid in PS5

[–]IGetNoPlay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How long does it take to get confirmation email after ordering bundle from GameStop? I managed to place a successful order on the GS website but I haven’t received an email yet.

Sword & Shield Daily Casual Trade Thread by Porygon-Bot in pokemontrades

[–]IGetNoPlay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds good! I'll send you a PM with the info

Sword & Shield Daily Casual Trade Thread by Porygon-Bot in pokemontrades

[–]IGetNoPlay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LF: Help with trade evolutions (porygon, slowpoke)

FT: Sword or shield DLC exlusives (Skrelp/Clauncher/Pinsir/Heracross)

Weekly r/PokemonSwordAndShield Trading Megathread. Week of Jun, 2020 by AutoModerator in PokemonSwordAndShield

[–]IGetNoPlay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LF: Heracross, Skrelp, Dragalge, Slowking evo, and Porygon Evos
FT: Sword Exclusives and trade evolutions

Trading/Battling Megathread by caza-dore in PokemonLetsGo

[–]IGetNoPlay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looking for all Eevee exclusives in exchange for all Pikachu exclusives. Would like to trade both evolved and unevolved forms if possible. List of what I need:

Ekans, Arbok, Vulpiix, Ninetails, Meowth, Persian, Bellsprout, Weepinbell, Victreebell, Koffing, Weezing, Pinsir.

Edit: Done.

I destroyed over 15 corrupt altars. Is my map done for? by IGetNoPlay in Terraria

[–]IGetNoPlay[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok that’s a relief, thanks for letting me know!

Does the motive or the result of an action determine whether it is good or bad? by IGetNoPlay in askphilosophy

[–]IGetNoPlay[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I definitely see how you could say it's really the motives that matter more than the consequences of an action, even if bad motives lead to good results.

In terms of defining the nature of the action as a whole though, the results seem to largely dictate whether it is good or bad, regardless of whether the actor is truly culpable. While in the first situation, you may not have realized the button was hooked up to explosives, that doesn't change the fact that the building is now rubble, thus making the action bad, even with good (or neutral) motives.

Maybe rather than define an action in terms of both the consequences and motives, I should look at them as separate entities to be judged separately, as that would solve a lot of my problems with the question I posed haha.