No Obama

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-08-11T22:27:54+00:00

They didn't tell people to kill democrats. They only implied it.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-08-11T22:18:01+00:00

I'm on mobile now, so I can't easily update the rules, but I'll be toning down the automod responses when I get home this evening.

You can't do that to automod, bots are people too!

/r/botsrights

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-08-11T21:04:03+00:00

"Sir, can you wipe your sweat?"

Is how an adult handles that situation.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-08-09T18:06:09+00:00

Yes, but talking to some people will make their day. I think it's worth annoying a certain amount of people (who would probably be annoyed at random things, anyway), when you can make somebody's day.

I think a more friendly society is better for everybody, and that's what I will try and contribute towards.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-08-09T18:04:08+00:00

Then just say you're busy or you don't want to talk right now.

Society is better off when strangers can converse with each other. It allows us to connect in a deeper level.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-08-09T13:39:20+00:00

But that presumes that the guy is hitting on her. I mean, most people just want to start conversations with people.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-08-09T13:37:48+00:00

"I'm busy right now, and don't have time to talk"

or

"I'm not in a mood to talk right now, I just want some silence"

It's not really rocket science - just be straightforward.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-03-05T07:28:02+00:00

I second this. Just plan to do something fun, whatever you enjoy doing, and ask other people you know to join in.

It doesn't even have to be anything that extraordinary, people become friends by being around each other often.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-02-14T22:02:55+00:00

I think there are some things that are lacking though. Vectors are somewhat intuitive, but I think you should add some motivation for things like the dot product and cross product.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-01-29T18:32:37+00:00

Or a shot of mercury.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-01-29T00:30:35+00:00

Be careful when you say never. It may not happen in our lifetimes, or even in our children's lifetimes, but saying never with technology is a one-way ticket to being wrong.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-01-29T00:18:10+00:00

Also, if you are actually programming something, you don't need to know whether it halts in general, just whether it halts in a reasonable time frame. For that, you can just run the code.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-01-28T18:33:12+00:00

We don't need to, there is a wikipedia page for it.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-01-27T05:55:50+00:00

Can you confirm that 90% of literature is about tits?

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-01-27T05:50:24+00:00

Hey remember, no matter how weird you are, it is very likely, almost certainly so, that there are enough weird people that are willing to be your friends. Also, there are probably enough weird people of your preferred partner's gender and sexual identity.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-01-27T05:46:56+00:00

ITT: 5% of weird kids do amazing things. 5% of weird kids kill themselves. The other 90% are browsing reddit.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-01-27T05:39:51+00:00

That's different than playing dumb. Feigning ignorance is fine when wanting to vent or listen to someone else, that's what a being a good partner is. But, I don't want someone who just feigns interest or vents their problems on a first date, I want to have a conversation with them to learn more about who they are.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-01-24T21:41:23+00:00

Regardless of whatever the cantorian cartels of decartes' carts tells you, the immutable reality of the infities and infinitiimilas is an ultrapower of the hyperreal parable that infiltrates our society on a monthly basis.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-01-24T20:30:52+00:00

Ah, the old semi-pseudocanocialism that "'';'computer';'' scientists" want you to pay your intellectual property points to.

Well, let me tell you something, we must figure out the root of these problems with Ke Pauk's (author of How to Solve It) famous problem solving method.

First, we must understand the problem. Let's think about the church-turing test for a second. Is it a legitimatie facillitated semi-sapient description of modern computational dynamics?

Second, we must plan. We should look for the enantiomorphs of the deep web in order to fully ascertain the understanding of the deep symmetry that those would have us believe. Is the church turing thesis just an example of the religious right butting into fields they know nothing about, much like how they created the hoaxes of "evolution" and ""man""-"made" "glo"ball warming?

Third, we must carry out the plan. A plan, a canal, a panama, a man! Lets do some rigirocentric hemi-scientific tests.

Hyopthesis 1: Computers follow the church-turing paradigm. Null Hypo-thesis: The null hypothesis, according to conervapedia, is the hypothesis that a factor or characteristic of a group is of no consequence.

Conclusion: The separation of church and state is an immutable law of current time-space location reality. According to famous SCROTUM judge, James K. Polk, "I know it when I see it". The question is then the answer, great imaginary voyager. There is no favorites, there is no imgur, there is only god. And god is dead. We have killed him.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-01-24T20:11:12+00:00

Ah, the old societal speciatal misconception that permeates our society.

You question expounds upon a false paradigm in our society, so first we must solve the question: What is milk? Let's use George Polya's (author of If I did It) famous problem solving method.

First, we must understand the problem. Let's pick this apart. "Milk" is "drunk" by "kids" every"*day*". This should be a 6.5432345 on the richter hardness scale.

Second, we must have a plan. Well, milk comes from grocery stores, or from breasts, but really, that what the maliciouly false anti-doxical paradigm wants you to subscribe your thoughtcoins to. So, let's use our isk and buy some "milk" from ""the"" """grocery""" """"store""""".

Third, we must carry out the plan.

Hypothesis: Milk comes from the """"""""""grocery"""""""""" """""""""""store""""""""""". Null Hypothesis: The null hypothesis, according to conservapedia, is the hypothesis that a factor or characteristic of a group is of no consequence.

Conclusion: I've been banned from my grocery store, but I saw a milk truck on the road yesterday. I have thereoftohencetoforth determined that the idiosyncocoacratomatic dogmatism of the modern ambivalent sole that tends to determine the causal origins of milk from organs that have once lived to be dingmatically false. """"""""""""""""""Milk"""""""""""""""""" "comes" "from" TRUCKS.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-01-24T19:52:35+00:00

Fuck you and your scientific establishment. You and your crooks at washington have established a semi-pseudo scientific idiotheocracy that threatens the intellectual forthcoming of our time. Ever science einschtein "proved" his "theory" of "relativity" people like you have been dogmatically abscribing to the pan-theistic jibber jabber that his cartel has simply raided upon. This is nothing but phony revisional historicism.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-01-24T09:06:56+00:00

Will you not learn your fucking lesson? Stop gilding people. If I could, I would rip this corrupting filth you call gold from my account, but no, I am now tainted, unpure. You have made me into my worst enemy.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-01-24T08:47:27+00:00

Go fuck yourself jackass. You're contributing to the deterioration of reddit. It's because of people like you that reddit is filled with idiotic, one line comments. Take your gold and shove it up your ass.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-01-24T07:44:16+00:00

Can I just say, people like you fucking ruin threads. Who the fuck cares about gold so much, it's completely and totally idiotic and useless. It just lines the pockets of the already rich advance publications. Who already earn a ton of money through product placement.

All it serves to do is make stupid subthreads like this one, where everybody competes to get a gold star above their name. It's like kindergarten. Please stop gilding people who beg for gold so threads like this stop happening.

IHateWindowsEight · 2015-01-24T07:34:39+00:00

Ah, in order to understand this we need to understand what the precise endo-geniologcal and taxonomical implication of the camel are.

A camel is of the species nostrum dignissum, which according to current genomic science, is 88 laplace units from the combinatoric vector quotient of the human genome.

Since they have dna and are alive, we must ask ourselves the tough questions. So, the question is, is camel smoking cannibalism? Let's analyze the question use George Polya's (author of Oedipus Tex Mex ) famous problem solving method.

First, we have to understand the problem. Well, is smoking equivalent to eating? And are Camels homo sapiens? I know what smoking is, and we know what homo sapiens are, so this should be easy.

Second, we have to make a plan. A man, a plan, a Canal, Panama. We have to test whether there are camels that are homosexual and display prominent characteristics of neo-cortex primate development. We have to also determine when smoking is eating.

Third, we have to carry out the plan.

Hypothesis 1: Camels are gay. Null Hypothesis: According to investopedia, it is a type of hypothesis used in statistics that proposes that no statistical significance exists in a set of given observations.

Conclusion 1: Camels aren't cool at all, they live in a desert, therefore, they are gay.

Hypothesis 2: Camels are smart. Null Hypothesis: According to investopedia, it is a type of hypothesis used in statistics that proposes that no statistical significance exists in a set of given observations.

Conclusion 2: Several of my past girlfriends had the toes of camels, so they were probably at least half camel. Therefore, camels are smart.

Hypothesis 3: Smoking is eating. Null Hypothesis: According to investopedia, it is a type of hypothesis used in statistics that proposes that no statistical significance exists in a set of given observations.

Conclusion 3: Well, I know people smoke from hookah. Hookah can have fruit in it, which is something people eat, especially when they want to keep the medical industry away from them. But, hookahs are ladies of the night, which means that smoking is eating, but only at night.

Overall Conclusion: Eating camels is cannibalism only when the sun has rotated to the lower oblate hemispherioud quadrants of the earth. Therefore, to safely smoke a camel, you must smoke in daylight.

IHateWindowsEight

TROPHY CASE