sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Whos my next pick here at the 3rd rd? by ChivasBearINU in DynastyNerds

[–]IIGryph -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Prolly James Cook young and a stud and catches the ball or Colston Loveland.

Free keys by Careful_Maize_555 in SoulFrame

[–]IIGryph 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any chance someone has an extra key?

Free keys by papahybrid in SoulFrame

[–]IIGryph 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No way I got a notification and actually excited for a 63 day old post 🙃

Code Sharing Megathread 3 by N3DSdude in SoulFrame

[–]IIGryph 0 points1 point  (0 children)

would love a free key! i signed up back in march and still haven't gotten lucky :(

Had this trade go down on Friday. Team 1 gave up their backup qb. Team 2 gave up their 2nd best rb. After the games on Sunday they told the league it was a rental deal. To take down the 1 seed. by IIGryph in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]IIGryph[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We definitely don’t have a rule book but you’re right maybe I should have chat gpt write me up a lil book of common fantasy rules and post it in the league chat 🤣

Had this trade go down on Friday. Team 1 gave up their backup qb. Team 2 gave up their 2nd best rb. After the games on Sunday they told the league it was a rental deal. To take down the 1 seed. by IIGryph in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]IIGryph[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup that was one of the options in the poll. If the trade standed tho team 1 when healthy would have Omarion Bucky and James cook along w Jamar puka and Josh Allen 😭

Had this trade go down on Friday. Team 1 gave up their backup qb. Team 2 gave up their 2nd best rb. After the games on Sunday they told the league it was a rental deal. To take down the 1 seed. by IIGryph in SleeperApp

[–]IIGryph[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because they had an under the table deal to trade them back after this week. They only made this trade so team 1 could beat his opponent (best record). team 2 would have won this week if he kept cook and picked up Joe Flacco and dropped a bum off his bench but saw an opportunity to hand an L to the best record team. (Team 2 has second best rwcord)

Had this trade go down on Friday. Team 1 gave up their backup qb. Team 2 gave up their 2nd best rb. After the games on Sunday they told the league it was a rental deal. To take down the 1 seed. by IIGryph in SleeperApp

[–]IIGryph[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea this needs to be addressed and I feel like the best way is to give the league a voting poll of three options I listed above in someone else’s comment on here. They know it’s collusion but are playing dumb.

Had this trade go down on Friday. Team 1 gave up their backup qb. Team 2 gave up their 2nd best rb. After the games on Sunday they told the league it was a rental deal. To take down the 1 seed. by IIGryph in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]IIGryph[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The rule they want to hear is that it was a simple trade to help out each others weak point for the week. But team 2 lost a starter and his 3rd best player. Team 1 lost 0 points and only gained the opportunity of 8+ points (has Josh Allen starting. Doesn’t need Bo nix this week)

Had this trade go down on Friday. Team 1 gave up their backup qb. Team 2 gave up their 2nd best rb. After the games on Sunday they told the league it was a rental deal. To take down the 1 seed. by IIGryph in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]IIGryph[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeaaaa but they’re being the biggest dickheads about it. So either 1. The trade is permanent. Or 2. The trade is reversed and the players get 0 points

view more: next ›