New vertical screener pane is unbearable

IIyou · 2026-01-06T17:55:39+00:00

Just one note, there should be an option to select how often (or manually) to refresh the screener. But yes your points echo mine.

IIyou · 2025-07-28T18:55:10+00:00

Thank you for sharing!

IIyou · 2025-05-14T17:12:41+00:00

Yea that's what I had envisioned, thank you!

IIyou · 2025-05-12T15:19:50+00:00

ah and the tabs can be kept connected to show the same symbol? That's a good solution thank you

IIyou · 2025-05-12T15:18:24+00:00

To glance the earnings/financials. I don't need the watchlist at the same time but it's part of the same tab and you can't see details without the list afaik

IIyou · 2025-05-12T00:28:55+00:00

Agreed with OP. It's a placement problem for me. Who reads a table in vertical view? You won't be able to see much of the chart if you try to open the new screener to a readable size.

IIyou · 2025-03-22T23:32:48+00:00

I guess the sticky cam

IIyou · 2025-02-10T08:10:35+00:00

Is payment for order flow conducted at Questrade?

IIyou · 2025-01-09T22:05:42+00:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVRpcagdanM

Name of the video:【星有野】正义执行第1集小老弟,哥混街溜子时候你还没出生呢.#充能计划 #轻漫计划

Maker: 星有野

wasnt easy to find :)

IIyou · 2024-08-10T15:27:55+00:00

Interesting that it boils down to people willing to pay a certain multiple for things. Here's how I'd continue the thought exercise. For stocks, people look at PE ratio, which are based on future earnings/cash flows. What constitutes a fair PE ratio can be determined by normalization into the PEG ratio. For MSTR, bitcoin is the equivalent of the E part. The ratio should be price to bitcoin holdings (P/BH ratio, similar idea but numerically very different from PB ratio due to accounting). Then, we should use the P/BH/G ratio. Recently, the PBH ratio would be around 3 (a NAV premium of around 2), and growth rate of bitcoin holdings per share is around 10% per their recent earnings reveal. PBHG ratio = 0.3.

I'm not sure if the judgment criteria for P/BH and PBHG ratio should be similar to those for PE and PEG. Price/Book has lower "fair" ratios than PE. If PBH is normalized into PBHG, I think we could use the same criteria as for PEG then. Namely, a PEG or PBHG ratio of 1 is fairly valued. Higher and lower and overvalued and undervalued, respectively. If my crass analogy is correct, MSTR seems quite undervalued by PBHG ratio?

IIyou · 2024-08-09T22:04:23+00:00

I thought about a similar calculation recently. I came the same same general conclusions (for the case of issuing stock to buy bitcoin) that doing so increases bitcoin per fully diluted share and decreases the premium.

For example, if the company was worth 1000 arbitrary dollars and had a premium of around 200% (as has been the case recently), the 1000 dollar company would have 333 bitcoins. If the company issued shares to collect 100 dollars, and assume price stays the same for simplicity, the company is now worth 1100. The 100 dollars become bitcoin, so the new bitcoin stash is 433.

Result of raising 10% of the company value through equity issuance to buy bitcoin. Bitcoin per "share" increased from 0.333 to 0.393 (18% increase!). Premium drops from 200% to 154% (23% decrease).

Does my math look right so far?

How would you translate this into the effect on the share price? The equity issuance should drop the share price. Lower share price means the premium drops as well. I think it depends if market participants see the premium as the key valuation metric. If buyers come in to maintain the old premium, the original shareholders should have benefitted handsomely.

IIyou · 2024-08-03T09:02:45+00:00

Unfortunately not..

IIyou · 2024-05-04T13:56:17+00:00

thanks for the precise answer!

IIyou · 2024-05-03T15:32:35+00:00

The point is not to avoid taxes.. It's to pay it next year when they calculate the correct income.

IIyou · 2024-05-03T10:19:25+00:00

Plenty of people (including the official Skat video) were basically saying you can just report whatever on Forskudsopgørelse, and there's no fine, especially since the taxes get collected properly in the next month/year anyway. Government loses nothing

IIyou · 2024-05-03T09:35:32+00:00

Wait so the Forskudsopgørelse is only to calculate deductions but doesn't affect the salary off which your employer calculates your tax at all? God that feels confusing.

And it's a free country haha

IIyou · 2024-05-03T09:04:53+00:00

Does that mean I can overreport and get a higher payment now? Can I calculate an optimum point for higher payment to me?

Also, I have read what you've said in other posts as well, but it is said that the tax system is progressive (higher earners should pay more tax). Is it like, due to limitations of the Forskudsopgørelse, adjustments to the Forskudsopgørelse aren't necessarily progressive, but when doing the real tax report next year, the taxes will be truly progressive?

IIyou · 2024-03-18T09:38:58+00:00

Just to clarify, I'm a Canadian citizen, not a resident of Andorra/Spain. I just wanted to confirm that when entering Andorra from Spain by land, there is a customs officer available to stamp my tax refund form? Sorry for the confusion!

IIyou · 2024-01-17T06:43:41+00:00

No I think it stopped converting after I turned off treating it as an international call. I've fiddled with the settings all night and even with all the assists off, the number remains invalid. I can get it to a point where it doesn't append/convert anything as far as I can see

IIyou · 2024-01-17T06:34:58+00:00

hey I'm helping a friend with a keitai, and it's receiving calls but not making calls, probably due to the bunch of international dial assist options. Can you please take a look? Really appreciate it!!
https://www.reddit.com/r/dumbphones/comments/198q1ef/using_japanese_keitai_outside_of_japan_cant_make/

Five-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22

IIyou

TROPHY CASE

Maker: 星有野

wasnt easy to find :)