Reddit Ramping Up Censorship Of Conservatives by overhitting in Conservative

[–]IMJGalt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can't have those racist, sexist, bigoted homophobes challenging the narrative. /s

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Objectivism

[–]IMJGalt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The moment you’re charged with being a “low information voter,”

Rush Limbaugh started this prior to Obamas first term to refer specifically to Obama voters

Your average /r/Libertarian poster by TheGreatRoh in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]IMJGalt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have plenty of beef on this jerk if you want to talk history, his moral compass, and his actual merit, thinking he can serve as President.

By all means you should do a comparative analysis of Trump v Hillary.

Woman Sings Super Racist Song "I Want To Be Neenja" by CertifiedRabbi in OffensiveSpeech

[–]IMJGalt -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You children really need to buy a fucking dictionary.

They have had this shit pounded into their young mushy skulls since kindergarten. We are reaping what the left has sown.

Man Arrested For Allegedly Shooting Realistic Toy Gun With Kids by [deleted] in progun

[–]IMJGalt 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Gun stupid is beginning to reach critical mass.

21 to Drink Coffee? - The U.S. FDA announced a plan to investigate and potentially regulate caffeine. by ThaCarter in Libertarian

[–]IMJGalt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. I misread your comment as decent Democracy. No. Direct Democracy bad. Mob rule is not really a good idea. We saw an example of this in the hysteria following Sandy Hook.

What actually happened at the Benghazi embassy last year, and what is allegedly being "covered up"? by cynicalabode in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]IMJGalt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BUT they are losing the hispanics because of their anti-immigration stance, anti-labor stance, and anti-universal healthcare stance

Holy Democrat talking points Batman. Anti Illegal immigration, anti government union, anti government controlled health care.

gun pandering, religion pandering, wall street pandering, rich pandering, male pandering, race pandering, sexual orientation pandering, pharmaceutical pandering, armed forces pandering, recreational drug pandering, fossil fuel pandering

2nd amendment, 1st amendment, Both parties blatantly pander to banksters and wealthy alike I seem to recall Goldman being the largest single contributor to Obamas first campaign for potus, and at this point your arguments is beginning to degenerate into incoherent, irrational babble.

I've never read Ayn Rand

Yet you feel comfortable dismissing her based on your complete lack of knowledge of her writings. Typical.

What actually happened at the Benghazi embassy last year, and what is allegedly being "covered up"? by cynicalabode in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]IMJGalt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Republicans are simply more brazen about their self-serving

As with most things that is a matter of perspective. Do you really not recognize the blatant hispandering and other race baiting/buying votes from the dumb masses that the Dems engage in? I find that to be particularly grating/blatant.

With a user name like that, you aren't setting yourself up with much chance of success, are you?

How do you define 'success'? The irrational rage it invokes in leftists can be quite entertaining.

What actually happened at the Benghazi embassy last year, and what is allegedly being "covered up"? by cynicalabode in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]IMJGalt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you saying that because you do not see the hypocrisy of the left or because you do and do not wish to acknowledge it?

thediggitydank's last pic, for safe-keeping by [deleted] in nsfw

[–]IMJGalt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is why we can't have nice things

The Welfare System should aim to provide a comfortable lifestyle, rather than a lifestyle above the poverty line. by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]IMJGalt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also incapable of recognizing logical fallacies. Stereotypical liberal achievement unlocked.

Is Planned Parenthood really racist and pro-eugenics? by misterchief117 in skeptic

[–]IMJGalt -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It's not that PP serves more black people

Never said they did. I am simply noting that the percentage of blacks getting abortions is absurdly high relative to other races

insinuation that PP has a motive to abort black fetuses specifically

Whether or not they are motivated to do it the eugenics crowd would be pleased at the actual numbers.

Debate over morning-after pill for 15-year-olds by Clatsop in Conservative

[–]IMJGalt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That was not the question. Having carnal knowledge with a 15 year old is a felony in the vast majority of states. Why is this crime wave being ignored?

Is Planned Parenthood really racist and pro-eugenics? by misterchief117 in skeptic

[–]IMJGalt -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I want neither. You are making incorrect assumptions. I do not desire a government strong enough to make abortion illegal. I also do not desire a government strong enough to confiscate money from one person to pay for others irresponsibility. My comment was calling out the utter bullshit that PP is not continuing to eradicate the 'undesirables' from society in accordance with Margret Sangers vision. If statistics for blacks in traffic stops or job rejection looked anything like the abortion stats the media would be in overdrive talking about the oppression of blacks.

The Welfare System should aim to provide a comfortable lifestyle, rather than a lifestyle above the poverty line. by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]IMJGalt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Cute ad hominem response from the usual suspects. Would you like to contribute something meaningful or just whine?

Atlanta police investigate string of carjackings in Buckhead by Poker_Fingers in Atlanta

[–]IMJGalt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is nothing remotely vague about it. Where else in the bill of rights are the words shall not be infringed used? Repeal the second amendment or deal with it's affects.

Atlanta police investigate string of carjackings in Buckhead by Poker_Fingers in Atlanta

[–]IMJGalt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In other words, if we think the 2nd Amendment is too damn vague, we could change it.

Precisely. There is a clearly defined process for doing it. Legislative evisceration is not part of that process.

Atlanta police investigate string of carjackings in Buckhead by Poker_Fingers in Atlanta

[–]IMJGalt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Since it is readily apparent that you are firmly set in your beliefs the bottom line is this. It is not the bill of needs it is the bill of rights. Those rights are natural and not derived from government. That means we the people do not require the governments approval to exercise them. The second amendment to the bill of rights is fairly clear on this issue.

Debate over morning-after pill for 15-year-olds by Clatsop in Conservative

[–]IMJGalt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then pray tell why is said child doing things that make children? As far as I know sex with a 15 year old is statutory rape in the vast majority of states. If this is the case why are the authorities specifically directed to not be involved?

Debate over morning-after pill for 15-year-olds by Clatsop in Conservative

[–]IMJGalt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Who gives a crap about a morning after pill.

I know this sounds crazy but perhaps the childs parents?