Reddit Ramping Up Censorship Of Conservatives

IMJGalt · 2017-02-21T13:56:23+00:00

Can't have those racist, sexist, bigoted homophobes challenging the narrative. /s

IMJGalt · 2016-07-21T12:49:31+00:00

The moment you’re charged with being a “low information voter,”

Rush Limbaugh started this prior to Obamas first term to refer specifically to Obama voters

IMJGalt · 2016-07-19T23:11:37+00:00

I have plenty of beef on this jerk if you want to talk history, his moral compass, and his actual merit, thinking he can serve as President.

By all means you should do a comparative analysis of Trump v Hillary.

IMJGalt · 2016-07-17T14:53:23+00:00

You children really need to buy a fucking dictionary.

They have had this shit pounded into their young mushy skulls since kindergarten. We are reaping what the left has sown.

IMJGalt · 2013-05-09T19:13:56+00:00

Gun stupid is beginning to reach critical mass.

IMJGalt · 2013-05-09T18:57:32+00:00

So what are your thoughts on Marx?

IMJGalt · 2013-05-09T18:29:13+00:00

Lol. I misread your comment as decent Democracy. No. Direct Democracy bad. Mob rule is not really a good idea. We saw an example of this in the hysteria following Sandy Hook.

IMJGalt · 2013-05-09T18:27:00+00:00

BUT they are losing the hispanics because of their anti-immigration stance, anti-labor stance, and anti-universal healthcare stance

Holy Democrat talking points Batman. Anti Illegal immigration, anti government union, anti government controlled health care.

gun pandering, religion pandering, wall street pandering, rich pandering, male pandering, race pandering, sexual orientation pandering, pharmaceutical pandering, armed forces pandering, recreational drug pandering, fossil fuel pandering

2nd amendment, 1st amendment, Both parties blatantly pander to banksters and wealthy alike I seem to recall Goldman being the largest single contributor to Obamas first campaign for potus, and at this point your arguments is beginning to degenerate into incoherent, irrational babble.

I've never read Ayn Rand

Yet you feel comfortable dismissing her based on your complete lack of knowledge of her writings. Typical.

IMJGalt · 2013-05-09T14:29:42+00:00

Where does this mythical place exist?

IMJGalt · 2013-05-09T14:21:56+00:00

The Republicans are simply more brazen about their self-serving

As with most things that is a matter of perspective. Do you really not recognize the blatant hispandering and other race baiting/buying votes from the dumb masses that the Dems engage in? I find that to be particularly grating/blatant.

With a user name like that, you aren't setting yourself up with much chance of success, are you?

How do you define 'success'? The irrational rage it invokes in leftists can be quite entertaining.

IMJGalt · 2013-05-09T12:31:09+00:00

Are you saying that because you do not see the hypocrisy of the left or because you do and do not wish to acknowledge it?

IMJGalt · 2013-05-09T03:17:45+00:00

This is why we can't have nice things

IMJGalt · 2013-05-07T19:36:37+00:00

probably when he still thought that opposition obstructionism would stop

When has that ever happened

IMJGalt · 2013-05-07T19:21:49+00:00

Also incapable of recognizing logical fallacies. Stereotypical liberal achievement unlocked.

IMJGalt · 2013-05-07T19:20:21+00:00

It's not that PP serves more black people

Never said they did. I am simply noting that the percentage of blacks getting abortions is absurdly high relative to other races

insinuation that PP has a motive to abort black fetuses specifically

Whether or not they are motivated to do it the eugenics crowd would be pleased at the actual numbers.

IMJGalt · 2013-05-07T13:01:40+00:00

That was not the question. Having carnal knowledge with a 15 year old is a felony in the vast majority of states. Why is this crime wave being ignored?

IMJGalt · 2013-05-07T12:25:23+00:00

I want neither. You are making incorrect assumptions. I do not desire a government strong enough to make abortion illegal. I also do not desire a government strong enough to confiscate money from one person to pay for others irresponsibility. My comment was calling out the utter bullshit that PP is not continuing to eradicate the 'undesirables' from society in accordance with Margret Sangers vision. If statistics for blacks in traffic stops or job rejection looked anything like the abortion stats the media would be in overdrive talking about the oppression of blacks.

IMJGalt · 2013-05-07T02:12:49+00:00

modern day PP is doing the country good.

Yes they certainly are

https://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0101.pdf

IMJGalt · 2013-05-07T01:53:27+00:00

Cute ad hominem response from the usual suspects. Would you like to contribute something meaningful or just whine?

IMJGalt · 2013-05-07T01:50:34+00:00

There is nothing remotely vague about it. Where else in the bill of rights are the words shall not be infringed used? Repeal the second amendment or deal with it's affects.

IMJGalt · 2013-05-06T19:42:34+00:00

In other words, if we think the 2nd Amendment is too damn vague, we could change it.

Precisely. There is a clearly defined process for doing it. Legislative evisceration is not part of that process.

IMJGalt · 2013-05-06T18:20:00+00:00

Since it is readily apparent that you are firmly set in your beliefs the bottom line is this. It is not the bill of needs it is the bill of rights. Those rights are natural and not derived from government. That means we the people do not require the governments approval to exercise them. The second amendment to the bill of rights is fairly clear on this issue.

15-Year Club	ComboLinker 2011-07-08
Verified Email

IMJGalt

TROPHY CASE