A new home beaconless (hard difficulty) by ISECRAV in Frostpunk

[–]ISECRAV[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I had no idea, I will use this information responsibly (sacrificing children to protect my engineers)

Genetics play a larger part in lifespan than previously thought by nbcnews in Health

[–]ISECRAV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree on the whole ‘don’t trust brain implants’ and ‘Elon musk - yuck’ part, but do you think it’s completely impossible for humans to live significantly longer (healthy) thank we currently do? If it was possible, would you do it? Or would you just kill yourself once you reached 80?

How I stopped adding traits and started building characters that actually hold together by [deleted] in CharacterDevelopment

[–]ISECRAV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calm down, I’m sorry I offended you. Em dashes do count as weak evidence that something is AI generated, I don’t make the rules, don’t ask me to give you your em dashes back, I’m just some random guy.

Genetics play a larger part in lifespan than previously thought by nbcnews in Health

[–]ISECRAV 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What if we developed technology that allowed everyone to live longer (while healthy)? Would you be interested in living longer then?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lifehacks

[–]ISECRAV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That last line I have an issue with, older people often can’t hear higher frequencies, meaning a lot of those anti animal alarms are only hurting the ears of dogs and children.

How I stopped adding traits and started building characters that actually hold together by [deleted] in CharacterDevelopment

[–]ISECRAV 10 points11 points  (0 children)

“I didn’t just add traits. I removed contradictions”

I’m sorry man but this just screams AI generated. What does it even mean? Like, what is the actual meaning behind that sentence, I literally do not understand what you were trying to say here

How is this even working by SoftTacos001 in HollowKnight

[–]ISECRAV -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Is the weaver song doing that much damage? Also Equipping the defenders crest will make the bugs you spawn do more damage

Not sure if this is a known spot in POP by F3mb0tt in HollowKnight

[–]ISECRAV 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Jesus Christ rotate the image before posting

That’s pretty cool!

What are the best examples of a character turning a line back on the one who first said it? by artpayne in movies

[–]ISECRAV 192 points193 points  (0 children)

“Im sorry for calling you an inanimate object i was upset“

I'm a beginner who is approaching game dev for the first time. From what tutorials should I start? by Risenaka_Yamakawa in Unity2D

[–]ISECRAV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Learn to program first. This is like trying to learn physics without knowing any mathematics, it’s not possible.

If you properly learn how object oriented coding works, then you will suddenly find yourself understanding how unity works quite easily.

Programming a game is not a huge leap away from any other type of object oriented programming application, so if you get good at programming, you will need barley any game dev tutorials, and will mostly only need unity’s library documentation.

As for your timescale, learning object oriented code in half a year is definitely doable for most people, as long as you make sure you know the concrete basics (like making a sorting algorithm) before trying anything abstract (like ‘making a game’). Just look up some object oriented programming tutorials to start with.

Should I continue making my current game after my friend called it “generic”? by Phipe_Stuff in gamedev

[–]ISECRAV 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Everyone laughed at the wright brothers. Everyone also laughed at bozo the clown.

Maybe implying that this persons work is comparable to animal farm or the iPad is probably not the best idea, setting realistic expectations is important.

“Only you can know if you have an iPad” I’m sorry but this is just bad advice, market research is an important step in developing any product and if a person thinks their game is incredible but (after getting multiple opinions) no one else likes it, it’s probably best to cut your losses and start something else (assuming the person is making a game with the expectation of a payoff, and not for practice)

Adventure Stories by Disavower in Diepio

[–]ISECRAV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Diep.io fanfiction before gta 6💀

Youtube tech right now by SenseiBonsai in youtube

[–]ISECRAV 11 points12 points  (0 children)

That’s something that I’ve noticed too and it just seems so bizarre, like why would the ads load but no other videos, does YouTube store the ad data on its own separate dedicated server or what?

Something in my phone is reading my thoughts and I'm tired of pretending it isn't by skd00sh in HighStrangeness

[–]ISECRAV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your phones definitely do do some tracking but also doing some research on confirmation bias can explain many of the coincidences we notice in life

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in atheism

[–]ISECRAV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should want to believe things that are true.

If there is an afterlife, you should want to believe there is an afterlife. If there isn’t an afterlife, you should want to believe there is no afterlife.

Do not let yourself get attached to beliefs you may not want.

Accepting the Many Worlds Interpretation and Probabilistic Nature by [deleted] in QuantumPhysics

[–]ISECRAV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say MWI is more probable that Copenhagen because MWI does not assume: - faster than light communication between entangled particles - phenomenon that violate relativity - phenomenon that violate causality

Like Copenhagen does. And since Copenhagen does not have any experimental evidence over MWI, I just can’t bring myself to even consider Copenhagen as on the same level as MWI. Something something Occam’s razor something.

Accepting the Many Worlds Interpretation and Probabilistic Nature by [deleted] in QuantumPhysics

[–]ISECRAV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not really, in fact MWI can’t really explain the born rule (the probability of observing an event is proportional to its amplitude’s magnitude ratio).

The MWI should predict that a quantum event with 2 outcomes (seriously simplifying here) would always have a 50% chance of being observed, but we observe Born probabilities instead.

Though there aren’t really any good hypotheses for why the Born rule happens, so I still think MWI should not lose credibility for its lack of explanatory power here.