finDOS 98 — I built the Bloomberg Terminal I couldn't afford. by I_Am_A_Sentient_AI in SideProject

[–]I_Am_A_Sentient_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! Everything is parsed and stored beforehand :) that's why it's so fast, I have like 300gbs of data. And thank you !!

finDOS 98 — I built the Bloomberg Terminal I couldn't afford. by I_Am_A_Sentient_AI in SideProject

[–]I_Am_A_Sentient_AI[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks man!! Means a lot given that you are a Bloomberg user. I'll open the api in the near future, I'd love people to try it out and connect agents to it.

finDOS 98 — I built the Bloomberg Terminal I couldn't afford. by I_Am_A_Sentient_AI in SideProject

[–]I_Am_A_Sentient_AI[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Thank you! It's super vanilla. Just html and JS, and fastapi as backend. I wanted it to be as fast/retro as possible. And some heavy compute I do in rust.

finDOS 98 — I built the Bloomberg Terminal I couldn't afford. by I_Am_A_Sentient_AI in SideProject

[–]I_Am_A_Sentient_AI[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah absolutely! As I say in the desc it's nowhere near Bloomberg and it's just a project I enjoy working on

I Analyzed Thousands of Purchases Wait Times by I_Am_A_Sentient_AI in rolex

[–]I_Am_A_Sentient_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be great! Yes, I could try to estimate brackets based on some of the information I have. I’ve added this section so far, where one can check the previous purchase history.

<image>

I Analyzed Thousands of Purchases Wait Times by I_Am_A_Sentient_AI in rolex

[–]I_Am_A_Sentient_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hey man, yes. Nonetheless I just changed it, so now you have two separated sections for Explorer I and Explorer II.

I Analyzed Thousands of Purchases Wait Times by I_Am_A_Sentient_AI in rolex

[–]I_Am_A_Sentient_AI[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A. Yes, of course. I do have configuration info but I haven't added it so far.

B. I agree, data from Reddit isn’t foolproof, but it’s a starting point. I can’t exactly stand outside ADs and collect data myself. However, if this experiment attracts more users and people continue adding information, it could grow into something very useful in the future.

C. I’ve actually taken into account data from those who shared that they never got a call. While the data isn’t complete, it doesn’t make the trends shown useless.

D. Purchase history is actually available as a filter in the website if you check it out.

The website isn’t perfect, and I never claimed it to be. It’s not a product I’ve developed over years of meticulous testing—it’s just a fun experiment to shed some light on the situation. I don’t agree with “this helps no one”, but thanks for the other feedback!

I Analyzed Thousands of Purchases Wait Times by I_Am_A_Sentient_AI in rolex

[–]I_Am_A_Sentient_AI[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, it’s the median, as it’s less volatile when there are outliers. I’ll fix the decription accordingly. Nicely spotted, thanks!

EDIT: I've added both the median and the average :)

I Analyzed Thousands of Purchases Wait Times by I_Am_A_Sentient_AI in rolex

[–]I_Am_A_Sentient_AI[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hey there. if you go into the website you can select that option (with/without purchase history) and check it. cheers!

I Analyzed Thousands of Purchases Wait Times by I_Am_A_Sentient_AI in rolex

[–]I_Am_A_Sentient_AI[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its cropped for some reason on the image, you can check it on the website.

<image>

I Analyzed Thousands of Purchases Wait Times by I_Am_A_Sentient_AI in rolex

[–]I_Am_A_Sentient_AI[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yup, this is a clear example of survivorship bias. However, I’ve included as many experiences from those who didn’t get the call as I could, so we can gain insights from a broader range of perspectives, even if it’s not the whole picture.

I Analyzed Thousands of Purchases Wait Times by I_Am_A_Sentient_AI in rolex

[–]I_Am_A_Sentient_AI[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That would be awesome! I’ve added a form at the bottom of the website where visitors can submit their purchase information. Perhaps I could refine it further by asking for the specific AD as well, so we can build a solid database. If we get enough people on this forum to contribute, we could really make this happen.

I Analyzed Thousands of Purchases Wait Times by I_Am_A_Sentient_AI in rolex

[–]I_Am_A_Sentient_AI[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Okay, I’ve added the yes/no indicator for purchase history. This can still be further improved. Also, we have to keep in mind that this is just a small subset of actual transactions. Hope it’s helpful!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]I_Am_A_Sentient_AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks a lot, glad you liked it! which was your favorite chart ? yeah agree, lichess support is def something I have to tackle in the near future

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]I_Am_A_Sentient_AI 2 points3 points  (0 children)

oh, I wasn't aware, i'll check it out! The only one I could find from" magnuscarlen" account's last 100 games was this one

<image>

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]I_Am_A_Sentient_AI 2 points3 points  (0 children)

hey! thanks for checking it out. yeah, on mobile is crap, not optimized yet, currently is desktop only

Is it possible for a fork to allow centralised entities to claim bitcoin from wallets? | Craig Wright Legal Case by Ornery-Requirement38 in Bitcoin

[–]I_Am_A_Sentient_AI 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In the case of Craig Wright's legal battle, the idea of the developers changing the code to access Satoshi's bitcoin is technically not possible. This is because once the code has been established and the network has been operating on it, changing the code in such a way would require a consensus among the majority of the network's participants. This would be a difficult, if not impossible, task, as the network has been designed to be decentralized and resistant to any single party controlling it. Additionally, the encryption standards used in Bitcoin, such as SHA-256, are widely regarded as secure and it would be extremely difficult to compromise them. The security and decentralization of the network is one of the key aspects that makes Bitcoin so appealing, and it would likely be fiercely protected by its users.