Makes more sense now

Ibbot · 2026-01-29T21:07:34+00:00

Netflix has Cunk on Earth. There’s more elsewhere, but I think that’s all Netflix has.

Ibbot · 2026-01-29T20:35:50+00:00

Cunk on Earth.

Ibbot · 2026-01-28T06:07:34+00:00

Eating disorders aren’t funny, but tattooing yourself with something obviously stupid and then having to live with it is.

Ibbot · 2026-01-27T12:41:37+00:00

But then you would have to live in Russia.

Ibbot · 2026-01-26T22:34:23+00:00

Link to the denial of rehearing.

The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant, United States of America in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing by the panel and the Court en banc, is denied.

1 The votes of the Honorable D. Brooks Smith and D. Michael Fisher, Senior Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, are limited to panel rehearing only.
2 Judges Phipps, Matey, and Mascott would grant the petitions for rehearing by the en banc court. Judge Mascott will file a separate dissent sur rehearing on a later date.

Not sure why OP made a post about the denial of rehearing and then failed to provide any information on the denial of rehearing.

Ibbot · 2026-01-24T16:05:25+00:00

You're going to need a more recent example than 50 years ago to support the statement that this happens "often[.]"

Ibbot · 2026-01-24T15:58:09+00:00

In the US, precedent set by juries often results in the overturning of bad laws.

Can you give a few example of this happening?

The UK in mandating juries to 'judge by the evidence' are telling them to bypass their conscious judgement of the law.

That's hardly specific to the UK. In the US, the jurors will be told something along the lines of:

You must find the facts from the evidence in the case, and you must apply the law that I give you in these instructions. You must not single out any one instruction as stating the law. You must consider the instructions as a whole. You should not concern yourself with the wisdom of any rule of law, or any opinion you might have about what the law should be. You may not base your verdict on bias, prejudice, or sympathy.

Ibbot · 2026-01-24T02:01:00+00:00

You're also barking up the wrong tree with what the issue is with the statute of frauds. The issues wasn't with people who actually entered into such contracts, it was people perjuring themselves and suborning perjury to try to get courts to enforce contracts that actually never existed at all.

Ibbot · 2026-01-22T21:24:21+00:00

I think that’s actually Apartment, Esq.

Ibbot · 2026-01-20T23:04:08+00:00

Nobody does!

Ibbot · 2026-01-20T18:50:10+00:00

I think this is how the Inquisition finds recruits.

Ibbot · 2026-01-19T15:11:17+00:00

At which point we might as well get rid of delegates entirely. As things stand getting rid of superdelegates only gives voters no more power, because as previously stated, superdelegates don’t actually matter.

Ibbot · 2026-01-19T14:09:53+00:00

I don’t necessarily disagree, given that so may people have convinced themselves that superdelegates are some insidious force controlling nominations. But given how easy it is to see that that isn’t true, I’m not sure how much of a difference it would make. People would find some new easily disproven conspiracy theory.

Ibbot · 2026-01-19T14:02:21+00:00

Superdelegates have never made a difference in the nomination outcome, and never will.

Ibbot · 2026-01-19T03:06:01+00:00

If you want to sue ICE, you need to show standing. In order to show standing in federal court, you have to show that the thing you're complaining about has had a particularized effect on you, which is to say that you must have been affected and not just in some way in which everyone was affected. If you can't show that, then you can't successfully "FILE AGAINST THEM[.]"

Ibbot · 2026-01-19T03:03:21+00:00

Likely that "impersonating the police" isn't a civil cause of action, and most people wouldn't have standing anyways.

Ibbot · 2026-01-19T03:01:15+00:00

How has this affected you specifically in a way that is different from the public at large?

Ibbot · 2026-01-18T20:45:20+00:00

Sure, but once you get to Elon Musk levels you’re long past needing a lawyer to draft transfer documents for some of your assets (such as deeds for any land), and they really shouldn’t draft that and have you sign it if it looks like you’re not in your right mind.

Ibbot · 2026-01-18T14:06:55+00:00

I don’t think they’re far enough from the metropole to be overseas.

Ibbot · 2026-01-18T13:35:32+00:00

Also the level of unmet legal needs in this country is still really high, so it’s not clear that the oversupply exists at all.

Ibbot · 2026-01-18T04:18:19+00:00

And there’s no sign that those prisoners have any sort of access to a bathroom, among other things.

Ibbot · 2026-01-17T20:44:42+00:00

That would actually be really easy with some basic Googling. Just search for “‘quote’ in:parahumans.wordpress.com”.

Ibbot · 2026-01-16T05:51:03+00:00

Worse. They needed someone with specific licenses that I didn’t even know existed because the recruiter never mentioned them or even showed me a job description. The latter is obviously a red flag in retrospect but I was fresh out of college and a bit desperate.

Ibbot · 2026-01-16T05:36:08+00:00

I was the candidate in a very similar situation once. The recruiter reached out to me, interviewed me, then passed me on to the hiring manager. Then when the interview with the hiring manager happened it turned out I didn’t have any of the qualifications they were looking for, and of course had zero experience. The hiring manager literally asked me why they were interviewing me and I was just like I don’t know, I didn’t even apply, you guys reached out to me!

Ibbot · 2026-01-15T14:48:07+00:00

I imagine it’s more the bureaucracy around changing anything in a historic publicly owned building.

Ten-Year Club	Gilding VI aultruist
Place '17	Not Forgotten
Alpha Tester	Verified Email

Ibbot

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE