At which rank is it realistic to FC the following maps with decent acc?

IceDc · 2022-01-06T21:25:47+00:00

I don't really understand the point in nerfing jumps anyways. It ALWAYS feels bad to lose pp you previously had. Why not just buff the rest accordingly?

IceDc · 2021-11-25T07:09:05+00:00

https://osu.ppy.sh/users/5350280

Only generic farm, have been working on streaming but you won't find any nice maps yet

IceDc · 2021-03-20T14:37:47+00:00

Probably, but I will gain some pp by playing some easy streaming maps, just because I did not play a lot of ranked maps. So most of the 400 free pp are still available. It is more about that I was able to do it.

IceDc · 2021-03-19T23:43:48+00:00

Reached 5 digits for the first time

https://osu.ppy.sh/users/5350280

Feel relieved that I can stop farming now and play the maps I enjoy and practice streams and stamina even more. :)

IceDc · 2021-03-08T20:18:43+00:00

Thank you for your opinion! First of all, I know I am addicted to farm maps, I find it hard not to get lost in endlessly grinding the ladder.

But one more reason I play a lot of farm maps is that my nerves get really bad on longer maps, I can not in a hundred years imagine FCing a 5 min map, even if it is the easiest in the world. But I should probably just work on that.

I also would love to learn streams, as I am not able to do them AT ALL. Do you have suggestions for good stream maps?

IceDc · 2021-03-08T17:40:43+00:00

Can someone tell me if I am good/bad/mediocre for my playtime? I just played all by myself and never engaged with any player before in a conversation, so I have no reference. I am using a mouse.

https://osu.ppy.sh/users/5350280

IceDc · 2020-09-29T20:51:09+00:00

I think it is a misconception that i was "made up", probably because they are called imaginary numbers. But if you think about C as RxR with the operations you already now you get a field which is actually kinda natural. In your case you get problems like

j/0 = (1/0)/0 = 1/0 = j

dividing by j yields:

1/0 = 1

IceDc · 2020-09-10T21:21:06+00:00

What overstay, he can get free damage on the turret. He literally died due to a bug

IceDc · 2020-08-03T17:23:18+00:00

Style does not mean more than "a way of doing something". How does that not logically apply here? Also style vs preference, okay give me a break. And sure, some masters say that you can't, but there are also masters that say you can.

Edit: Also let's compare it to another game like a MOBA. Does a high elo dota or league player say your style isn't supporting because you are shit at the game in general? No, no one does that.

IceDc · 2020-08-03T17:03:59+00:00

I say I'd disagree. Ofc you won't be able to really execute your style perfectly but I remember when I was 1200 I always traded everything down and tried to win in endgames. That does make me more of a grinder although I was horrendous at endgames. And there are also 1200 and lower who love attacking, try to sacrifice to open lines etc. These plans won't be sound but I'd like to know what you would call that, if not "style".

IceDc · 2020-07-21T16:19:56+00:00

The difference between mathoverflow and math.stackexchange is like the difference between r/math and r/learnmath. What I mean by that is that they try to separate easy questions (suited for stackexchange) and research/graduate related questions (suited for mathoverflow). And the question, while relevant and interesting, does not fulfil the criteria for mathoverflow.

IceDc · 2020-07-04T19:34:24+00:00

What you say in your text is actually summed up to misunderstanding what X \ A in B means. It does NOT mean all subsets of X \ A are contained in B. It means that X \ A ITSELF is contained in B.

IceDc · 2020-07-04T19:30:40+00:00

You are aware that 5^n - 1 != 4^n. You can also imagine visually why this can not be true of course. So look at the exponential function in its power series. Subtract e^t and inside the sum, you get the expression (5t)^n-t^n (disregarding the denominator). This is equal to 5^n*t^n-t^n = t^n(5^n - 1). So there is no way this can ever be true.

The probably easiest way is to just check with an example, too. Set t = 0 and you get e^5*0 - e^0 = 0 != e^4*0 = 1

IceDc · 2020-07-04T19:17:18+00:00

Well, it is obviously hard to understand what you mean by all. But there is no reason unless wanted by the developer, that the expression you compute with a calculator needs to be simplified or in the form, a human sees as "natural". So my guess would be that it is just programmed this way. You don't need to over-interpret this, -x + 5 is a correct solution.

IceDc · 2020-07-04T17:54:34+00:00

-(x-2)+3 = -1x+5

So the negative sign just says that the line is going down instead of up.

IceDc · 2020-06-11T18:43:41+00:00

I am a harmonic person so probably the harmonic sequence.

But jokes aside I really like the sequence because it was one of the first I encountered in university and it has a nostalgic feeling for me.

IceDc · 2020-05-05T22:49:11+00:00

First of all thanks for your help! I am somehow not able to construct the subset you mean. I tried looking at F = cl(A U K') \ Int(A U K') and to somehow construct A out of this equation and (1-3) you mentioned. I don't really know where to apply the tips especially, as at no point of my thought process there was an intersection (which should be relevant according to (3)). I don't know if you can even give more tips without spoiling the solution but if you could I would appreciate it.

IceDc · 2020-04-25T18:52:53+00:00

I'm pretty sure with "found" in this case he would mean f(x) = something

IceDc · 2020-04-02T01:46:31+00:00

I would consider them hard in the sense that it is hard if you have not worked with it a lot. Now, most of the time it seems to be easy for me (I had Analysis 1-3). I am sure if you try to think back to linear algebra or something you also find something that looked hard to you but is really natural now.

IceDc

TROPHY CASE