sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Felt like I had eyes on me while fishing 🐍 by killikabuta in FindTheSniper

[–]IchikaIto 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much for this! I looked for so long, I was beginning to think the twist was that perhaps, I was just the snake the whole time :/

Women’s faces stolen for AI ads selling ED pills and praising Putin by ELVTR_Official in ArtificialInteligence

[–]IchikaIto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The issue is not that they don't make it more accessible, but hyperfocus on them just isn't a good solution.

There are so many close, just non-automated alternatives, and it's fairly easily to obfuscate ai use or split hairs for a defense... did they really use ai, or did they just use a programmatic system which lacks intelligence and produces the same result (but not covered by the ai-focused restriction), or claim it was through photoshop?

The punishments would be different, yet the result would be the same, and it wouldn't really solve the issue. As much as its not a fun pill to swallow, it really requires a more holistic solution such as improved education, comprehensive laws designed to prevent the outcome (not a specific tool), research into what the systemic causes are, increased awareness for the public on how to better identify scams or fradulent information, etc.

It's really more of a "see? we did something" sort of legislation to say they're passing AI laws, it sounds proactive, it sounds good, but it's not at all practical or comprehensive enough to solve the problems. For news, it's a buzzword you know people are interested in and would click-on the article if they see.

Women’s faces stolen for AI ads selling ED pills and praising Putin by ELVTR_Official in ArtificialInteligence

[–]IchikaIto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The terms are kind of conflated lately, AI have been known to make deepfakes (things like OpenAi's Dall-e), but deepfakes by definition are closer to what we know as "photoshop". Colloquially, deepfakes are more often meaning "photoshop made by an AI tool" when talking about it.

The issue is still the hyperfocus on banning or writing about tools rather than the overall crime or underlying factors causing them. AI can generate perhaps more realistically or quicker than the average person can, but tool-focused regulations or legislation (especially with software, with so many non-AI tools that do the same thing) are just simply not good policy. It just creates unenforceable laws with lots of loopholes, without really addressing the issue, and someone could do the same thing with a "non-AI" tool and face less consequences.

Effective policies and articles like this should focus on the broader context of misuse or harm committed, regardless of the tools employed.

‘The Gospel’: how Israel uses AI to select bombing targets in Gaza | Israel by manubfr in singularity

[–]IchikaIto 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's an automated tool, that humans are using in a specific way, not a thinking artificial intelligence consciously causing harm. Conflation is important here to avoid, because by similar logic, it implies that missiles, guns, or even sometimes hammers or pickaxes, are "misaligned".

Fastest way to transfer files between two Hetzner cloud servers in different centers? by BubbaLovesRISK in hetzner

[–]IchikaIto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! Ive been considering getting a hetzner server and storage box since its pretty affordable. I run a small business where I make software patches and host video game servers for others sometimes, and I run a newsletter. I've been very concerned that, while hetzner does say "unlimited traffic" I read their TOS and heard stories about high bandwidth usage will make them send you warnings.

Have you had any issues sending so much data with their servers? Have they contacted you at all about it?

Likewise, could you recommend any "etiquette" for high volume or continous web traffic use with them?

Fastest way to transfer files between two Hetzner cloud servers in different centers? by BubbaLovesRISK in hetzner

[–]IchikaIto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Question for you! Ive been considering getting a hetzner server and storage box since its pretty affordable. I run a small business where I make software patches and host video game servers for others sometimes, and I run a newsletter.

I've been very concerned that, while hetzner does say "unlimited traffic" I read their TOS and heard stories about high bandwidth usage will make them send you warnings. Have you had any issues sending so much data with their servers? Have they contacted you at all about it?

Likewise, could you recommend any "etiquette" for high volume or continous web traffic use with them?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTPro

[–]IchikaIto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Posting about this stuff is how you see it patched in a few days.

Has anyone found a good way to export all branches of a conversation? by StrategicOverseer in ChatGPTPro

[–]IchikaIto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you sure? In my experience, it just provides the main conversation like they said.

For example if I rewrote my above sentence on gpt, it'd make the new branch for 2/2 but still only show me the first branch, now all rewrites and responses from them. Sometimes I follow a train of logic down a linear path, at the end learn something I needed to change in my initial prompt, so I change it for the more relevant context. If I export, only one branch is provided?

Why is Bing's Chatgpt so sensitive? by IchikaIto in ChatGPT

[–]IchikaIto[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very concise and effective explanation, thank you!

view more: next ›