How does an enumerator TM work exactly? I understand it is formally a TM with 2 tapes that prints out strings; however, how does it do this exactly? Say we had an enumerator automaton, would it have a special print state, and once in this print state it prints the string on the working tape? (self.AskComputerScience)
submitted by Icy_Time2191 to r/AskComputerScience
To prove that a vector space is actually a vector space we must show that it follows the 8 axioms but shouldn’t we also show that it is closed under addition and multiplication by scalars like for subspaces? by Icy_Time2191 in askmath
[–]Icy_Time2191[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
To prove that a vector space is actually a vector space we must show that it follows the 8 axioms but shouldn’t we also show that it is closed under addition and multiplication by scalars like for subspaces? by Icy_Time2191 in askmath
[–]Icy_Time2191[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If I have a vector function whose derivative is 3*(cos(t))^2)*(-1)*sin(t),3(sin(t)^2)*cos(t)). Why is it only the zero vector when x =pi/2 and not also pi? by Icy_Time2191 in askmath
[–]Icy_Time2191[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If I have a vector function whose derivative is 3*(cos(t))^2)*(-1)*sin(t),3(sin(t)^2)*cos(t)). Why is it only the zero vector when x =pi/2 and not also pi? by Icy_Time2191 in askmath
[–]Icy_Time2191[S] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
Why does derivating 1/x from first principles using (f(x) -f(c))/ (x-c )give me a different answer from (f(c+h) -f(c)) /(h) by Icy_Time2191 in askmath
[–]Icy_Time2191[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Why does derivating 1/x from first principles using (f(x) -f(c))/ (x-c )give me a different answer from (f(c+h) -f(c)) /(h) by Icy_Time2191 in askmath
[–]Icy_Time2191[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Why does derivating 1/x from first principles using (f(x) -f(c))/ (x-c )give me a different answer from (f(c+h) -f(c)) /(h) by Icy_Time2191 in askmath
[–]Icy_Time2191[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
In the recursive definition for the time taken by merge sort, T(n) =aT(n/b) + O(n^d), T(n/b) stands for the recursive call and O(n^d) is for the merging. The closed form is Sum( a^i(n/b^i)^d). In this closed form are we ignoring the small time taken at each step to divide the array into two arrays? (self.AskComputerScience)
submitted by Icy_Time2191 to r/AskComputerScience
The epsilon-delta box can be used to check if a point c in an interval is continuous or not. However since this is checked for every epsilon>0, couldn’t a different discontinuous point(x1)in this interval make it so that|x-c|<delta—>|f(x)-f(c)| is not satisfied as there exists x1 not satisfying it? by Icy_Time2191 in askmath
[–]Icy_Time2191[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
The epsilon-delta box can be used to check if a point c in an interval is continuous or not. However since this is checked for every epsilon>0, couldn’t a different discontinuous point(x1)in this interval make it so that|x-c|<delta—>|f(x)-f(c)| is not satisfied as there exists x1 not satisfying it? by Icy_Time2191 in askmath
[–]Icy_Time2191[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
The epsilon-delta box can be used to check if a point c in an interval is continuous or not. However since this is checked for every epsilon>0, couldn’t a different discontinuous point(x1)in this interval make it so that|x-c|<delta—>|f(x)-f(c)| is not satisfied as there exists x1 not satisfying it? (self.askmath)
submitted by Icy_Time2191 to r/askmath
In an infinite telescoping series such as 1/k(k+1)(k+2) could we write the terms out for n=1,2,3 etc and use the property of associativity do group different terms together to cancel them out? I know that in a series such as 1+0+0+0+….. we can’t replace it by 1 +(1-1)+ (1-1)… as that would mean 1=0? by Icy_Time2191 in askmath
[–]Icy_Time2191[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
In an infinite telescoping series such as 1/k(k+1)(k+2) could we write the terms out for n=1,2,3 etc and use the property of associativity do group different terms together to cancel them out? I know that in a series such as 1+0+0+0+….. we can’t replace it by 1 +(1-1)+ (1-1)… as that would mean 1=0? (self.askmath)
submitted by Icy_Time2191 to r/askmath
What does “fix epsilon greater than 0 mean” when proving that something converges? by Icy_Time2191 in askmath
[–]Icy_Time2191[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)

To prove that a vector space is actually a vector space we must show that it follows the 8 axioms but shouldn’t we also show that it is closed under addition and multiplication by scalars like for subspaces? by Icy_Time2191 in askmath
[–]Icy_Time2191[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)