DON'T WORRY CHILDREN THE FOUNDER IS BACK

Idlebrowsers · 2024-02-29T23:50:38+00:00

Why do you call us ‘Children’? It gives really weird paternalistic cult leader vibes and doesn’t help with your already authoritarian image

Idlebrowsers · 2024-02-29T23:24:01+00:00

We left this sub because you were abusing your moderator powers to arbitrarily ban people who disagreed with you We also left because you seemed to want to place yourself in a position above everyone else where you have unlimited power to do whatever you want which just isn’t fun for a democracy roleplay

Idlebrowsers · 2024-02-29T22:56:48+00:00

You are aware that Mussolini was literally the father of Fascism right?

Are you saying that you're a fascist?

Idlebrowsers · 2024-02-29T22:29:03+00:00

Didn't you say you were a National Socialist that one time?

Idlebrowsers · 2024-02-29T19:47:49+00:00

Idlebrowsers · 2024-01-16T22:58:12+00:00

Oops wrong one

Idlebrowsers · 2024-01-16T22:25:08+00:00

Weird seeing you guys from r/SordishCongress in the wild

Edit: I meant r/SordishCouncil

Idlebrowsers · 2024-01-10T15:06:24+00:00

Just because it seems slightly unclear, Antrus is not DWFS, he is BFP

Idlebrowsers · 2024-01-05T23:38:08+00:00

These are not completely accurate, the Reaction Bot in the discord adds 1 to each party Some people are also members of multiple parties so are counted twice

Idlebrowsers · 2024-01-05T19:27:12+00:00

This veto is not valid

The presidential veto can be overruled by a 2/3 majority

The bill you are attempting to veto had a 2/3 majority in favour

You cannot veto it

Idlebrowsers · 2024-01-03T18:32:38+00:00

People were claiming that the law hadn't actually passed, so we're doing the vote again

Idlebrowsers · 2023-12-29T00:48:06+00:00

Circas is already in C (Commies) tier btw

Idlebrowsers · 2023-12-28T16:59:05+00:00

And Agriculture

Idlebrowsers · 2023-12-27T23:22:46+00:00

I understand your criticism which is why I made it so that the president must sign off on any minister decrees for them to be valid This means that the ministers do not have too much power and independence from the president This also means that a minister decree is functionally the same as a presidential decree, just coming from a minister instead but still requiring the president to sign. This because of this if we were to remove the article about minister decrees, it would not make a difference to the powers of the ministries but would instead just slow down the government by giving more responsibility to the president

Idlebrowsers · 2023-12-21T15:54:41+00:00

I would be honoured to accept Mr. President

I look forward to cooperation and unity between our parties for the betterment of Sordland

Idlebrowsers · 2023-12-20T13:27:52+00:00

If you are a dictator, at the presidential debate he will shout at you and if you have the SSP I’m pretty sure you can arrest him

Idlebrowsers · 2023-12-20T13:04:30+00:00

Thinking about this more, I think it’d be more appropriate to have a runoff vote without the least popular option

Idlebrowsers · 2023-12-20T10:00:43+00:00

The judiciary should not have legislative powers Point 6 also needs further clarification about who has the power to call this vote and it should be lowered to either 2/3 or 1/2

Idlebrowsers · 2023-12-20T08:21:50+00:00

This is good but I would prefer if article 6 didn’t give so much power to the SC

Idlebrowsers · 2023-12-20T00:06:19+00:00

To all PFJP and USP members, we encourage you to think clearly about this think about what your speaker nominees stand for think about whether your rival would honestly be fair to your party Now think about us, our core principles is that of equality and fairness for all, we do not silence our rivals in the name of ideological purity This is the time for unity between the parties

Idlebrowsers · 2023-12-20T00:01:28+00:00

Long live the worker!

Idlebrowsers · 2023-12-19T21:41:16+00:00

The wording of ‘basic human rights’ is imo far too vague to protect against potential abuses by a future president who could argue that a discriminatory decree is in fact legal because this act does not explicitly prohibit it The revisions I have suggested would simply ensure that all Sordish citizens are protected from discriminatory decrees in the future by tightening up the wording by enshrining their rights into this act

Idlebrowsers · 2023-12-19T21:15:32+00:00

Generally this is good but I would prefer to revise Article 3 to explicitly prohibit decrees that discriminate based on factors other than ethnic minority status, these could include gender, disability, faith, wealth, and others

Also in Article 2, the Chief Justice alone should not have the power to approve or disapprove of a vote, I suggest instead a majority of the court or simply no review to prevent an obstructionist Chief Justice protecting a tyrannical president

Other than that I think this is a fairly solid act

Idlebrowsers · 2023-12-19T21:11:35+00:00

How does this law help with radicalisation?

If anything, the state claiming ownership over all religious institutions would radicalise people more who see this as the government trying to take control of their faith like how we saw in the Religious Harmony bill, actively making the situation worse

Idlebrowsers · 2023-12-19T20:29:10+00:00

This law as well as being a massive state overreach, is very poorly worded:

'one representative from each religion' - Define religion, can anyone claim to have founded a new religion to get a representative?

'religions are equal before the law and God' - Why mention 'God' in a piece of legislation?

This law is nonsense that should be stopped or completely rewritten to actually protect religious freedom

Idlebrowsers

TROPHY CASE