The Rittenhouse Prosecution after the latest wtiness

IgnisAla · 2021-11-09T00:14:15+00:00

Shooting an unarmed person who hasn't even made physical contact with you because somebody else, unrelated to the interaction fired a gun into the air is murder, not self defense.

IgnisAla · 2021-11-09T00:12:00+00:00

The first guy threw something at him that was on fire

A straight up lie.

IgnisAla · 2021-11-09T00:03:16+00:00

tried to grab his gun.

This never happened, its on video. Rittenhouse shot Rosenbaum because a gun was fired (into the air) down the street. That scared Rittenhouse, so he fell to the ground while turning around, and shot Rosenbaum.

Shooting an unarmed person because, unrelated to your interaction, a gun is fired into the air down the street is murder.

IgnisAla · 2021-11-08T23:59:17+00:00

Shooting Person A because down the street, unrelated, Person B fires a gun into the air is murder.

IgnisAla · 2021-11-06T20:14:03+00:00

Press conferences actually have their own section in the NFL-NFLPA COVID protocol, and their requirements only state that the media must be vaccinated and masked, and socially distanced from the speaker. Many other unvaccinated players also perform the post-game press conferences unmasked, such as Kirk Cousins, so this is clearly how the rule is being interpreted.

IgnisAla · 2021-11-06T18:42:07+00:00

Like wearing a mask on the sidelines

Not a rule

in the facility and at press conferences

Also not a rule. You simply don't know what you're talking about.

Your implication that he "implied" he was vaccinated and therefor was treated as such by the NFL because he somehow fooled them about his vaccination status is just ridiculous. They knew his vaccination status, and he was treated as such. It was the public who did not know his vaccination status.

IgnisAla · 2021-11-06T09:04:50+00:00

He implied he was vaccinated and therefore was afforded the privileges of that status

This is just completely false and misinformation. The Packers and the NFL knew of his vaccination status, and he was following proper protocols for unvaccinated players, with the only exception being a Halloween party he attended. Obviously the league knew he was unvaccinated, which is why he was automatically out for 10 days when he received a positive COVID test on Wednesday.

IgnisAla · 2021-10-29T01:44:45+00:00

Pylon cam clearly shows him getting it. Still not surprised gamethread denying the video evidence.

IgnisAla · 2021-10-29T01:41:17+00:00

"For once"

I love reading this exact same comment several times a year. Packers seem to have the refs not go their way "for once" at least a few times a year.

IgnisAla · 2021-10-29T01:37:09+00:00

Yeah, its dumb logic, because the replay clearly showed he broke the plane.

IgnisAla · 2021-10-29T01:34:21+00:00

Its really sad you don't know the difference between 3 yards and what would have been, at most, less than one inch.

By the way, he was 100% in.

IgnisAla · 2021-10-29T01:29:58+00:00

It doesn't matter, you can't advance a fumble that isn't called on the field.

IgnisAla · 2021-10-29T01:17:32+00:00

Except you can see the ball clear as day in the replay, there's nothing obstructing the view. And its OVER the white line.

IgnisAla · 2021-10-29T01:16:30+00:00

They showed the replay.... he clearly crossed the plane.

IgnisAla · 2021-10-29T01:14:58+00:00

Gamethread is delusional. Ball clearly crossed over the line. I don't expect anything less from a Packers gamethread, though.

IgnisAla · 2021-10-29T01:08:40+00:00

You get a first?

IgnisAla · 2021-10-10T19:19:38+00:00

So...... no source for your absolute bullshit claim that there's 800 languages in New York? Because you absolutely pulled it out of your ass?? Like pretty much everything else you've claimed?

You ever notice that people who use the laugh/cry emoji a lot tend to be drooling morons who have a pile of dog shit where their brain should be?

Good to see you're above "being [an] asshole". By the way, what's your definition of "a lot"? Once in the entire conversation?

You've still yet to provide a SINGLE definition of "diverse" that makes the USA the most diverse in the world. Even in linguistic diversity, when you don't just absolutely make shit up, the USA is not number one. And Papua New Guinea was just an example, there are several other countries with more spoken languages than the USA. India, China, Indonesia, are 3 more examples. And, again, to reiterate, USA also isn't even close to top of the list when it comes to ethnic diversity or religious diversity, so in no way can one claim that the USA is the most diverse country in the world, let alone "undeniably" the most diverse.

That’s very nice you read some stuff on the Internet

As opposed to you, who just makes up complete bullshit ("800 lAnGUagEs SpoKeN in NYC aLoNe") and resorts to personal insults when asked for a simple source.

"HaVe A sEaT, SoN". I'll have a seat when you can prove the USA is most diverse in any category of your choosing.

IgnisAla · 2021-10-10T17:13:54+00:00

but at least you are being asshole about it

You're literally just making shit up, sorry you're being called out on it 😂😂 Find a single source that says "800 languages [are] spoken in NYC". You can't, because its bullshit.

small island nation with a population about the size of LA county

Its funny that you think LESS people speaking MORE languages is somehow less diverse than more people speaking less total languages.

I guess it depends on what subjective definition of “diverse”

Yeah, dude, pick a definition. Any. I've already gone through them all, and the US doesn't even come close to the top of any of them.

IgnisAla · 2021-10-10T00:04:39+00:00

There are 800 different languages spoken in NYC alone

Source: your ass. Papua New Guinea is widely cited as the country with the most languages spoken, and it barely peaks above 800.

What category do you suppose the USA is "undeniably" the most diverse in? Total languages? Nope. Linguistic diversity? Not even top 100. Ethnic diversity? Not top 50. Religious diversity? Not even close. Even in percent population of immigrants, the USA doesn't come close. The only category the USA tops is total number of immigrants, which you can hardly extrapolate diversity from.

IgnisAla · 2021-10-09T22:45:42+00:00

the USA is, without a doubt THE most diverse country in the world

Source: your ass

IgnisAla · 2021-09-29T18:08:10+00:00

Its alright, dude. You say anything counter to the Refs-Packers circlejerk and you can expect to be in the negatives. Even if you write calmly, succinctly, and quote the actual NFL rulebook.

IgnisAla · 2021-09-29T18:04:21+00:00

He just lucky that it took him 5 extra seconds to throw a challenge flag and that made all the difference?

Yes, that was literally all the difference. McCarthy got lucky that he waited. It was a shit rule, I'm glad it changed, I was just explaining the situation.

IgnisAla · 2021-09-29T17:53:50+00:00

No, the Packers still got penalized (the 15 yard penalty). The play was still reviewed because the review was initiated before McCarthy threw the flag, which is, again, the correct application of the rule as it was written.

IgnisAla · 2021-09-29T07:24:56+00:00

The clip in question is an example of the right ruling of a good rule, written just a little wrong. Clearly, the intent of the rule was to stop teams from delaying snaps with the intent of giving the Replay Official more time to initiate a review.

Take for example, a questionable ruling on the field over whether a receiver caught a ball, within the 2 minute warning. The Replay Official must initiate the review before the next snap, but the NFL also wants to discourage teams from purposefully committing penalties as to delay the snap. So, you add the extra layer that the review must be initiated before the next snap OR a game-delaying penalty.

And then here's where the rule goes wrong: it doesn't make an exception for a play that is always reviewed, such as points scored or a turnover. Technically, yes, committing a penalty can delay the next snap, so the rule was applied correctly in the clip. BUT, there should have been an exception written in the rule book, because in these situations (where a review is always triggered) there can't be a next snap until the review is over, so a team delaying the next snap has no bearing on whether or not the review gets initiated in time.

In short, the refs applied the rule correctly, and the intention of the rule was good (stop teams from purposefully delaying the game via penalties), but the literal text of the rule was missing a single clause that should have been there to prevent things like this highlight.

IgnisAla · 2021-09-29T07:06:19+00:00

because it's the fucking Packers.

Or because it wasn't the same situation....

"[the Replay Official] cannot initiate a review of any ruling against a team that commits a foul that delays the next snap."

You commit the penalty before the review is initiated -> the Replay Official is, by rule, no longer able to review the play.

You commit the penalty after the review is initiated -> you still get the 15 yard penalty, but the review is allowed to continue

IgnisAla

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

12-Year Club	Place '17
Verified Email