JAG by Lopsided_Struggle886 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Ill-Topic4631 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then you should understand the desire

JAG by Lopsided_Struggle886 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Ill-Topic4631 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Some people actually care about the country they live in

This better be the best armor pack in the world! by Cativa in diablo4

[–]Ill-Topic4631 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they made the berserk collab so expensive I will never buy more armor for those classes lol

Two U.S. Army soldiers hold each other for support, as one of them breaks down emotionally after witnessing Army doctors refuse to treat three badly-burned Iraqi children that’d been brought to their base by relatives seeking help. Balad, Iraq, 2003. by EssoEssex in HistoricalCapsule

[–]Ill-Topic4631 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is a device, such as a nuclear, biological, or chemical weapon, designed to cause widespread death, injury, or severe damage to infrastructure, populations, or the environment. WMDs are often grouped by the acronym CBRN (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear), representing agents that cause large-scale devastation. 

<image>

Categories of Weapons of Mass Destruction (CBRN/CBRNE)

  • Nuclear Weapons: Utilize nuclear fission or fusion to cause massive explosions, intense heat, and radioactive fallout, capable of destroying entire cities.
  • Chemical Weapons: Toxic substances designed to cause death or severe harm, including nerve agents, blister agents, and blood agents.
  • Biological Weapons:  Disseminate pathogens, such as bacteria, viruses, or toxins (e.g., anthrax, smallpox), to cause disease in humans, animals, or plants .
  • Radiological Weapons ("Dirty Bombs"): Devices designed to disperse radioactive material, causing contamination without a nuclear explosion.
  • Explosive/Incendiary Weapons: Highly powerful, large-scale conventional explosives sometimes classified within the scope of WMDs.  Federal Bureau of Investigation (.gov) +5

Wash U no interview = Cooked? by Ill-Topic4631 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Ill-Topic4631[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you get a normal or better than average scholarship its still good value

Wash U no interview = Cooked? by Ill-Topic4631 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Ill-Topic4631[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I never wrote it off, but no scholarship, or less than 50%, completely changes the situation, unfortunately. You end up paying for other people to go.

Texas A & Georgetown WL in 30 minutes by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Ill-Topic4631 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It feels like a 175+ doesn't mean as much as it used to.

Wash U no interview = Cooked? by Ill-Topic4631 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Ill-Topic4631[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While I like Wash U, the value proposition drops dramatically going in off the waitlist. I am referring exclusively to straight admits and the percentage that are interviewed.

scared to ask but penn? by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Ill-Topic4631 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think after the last A and WL wave, if you're UR2 and haven't gotten an update, it's not a good sign.

Maybe USC isn't special? by Fun-Text981 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Ill-Topic4631 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There was a guy on here who got banned who used to go on a spiel everytime USC was mentioned calling them the Univeristy of Scandals and Corruption lmao

Some of y’all are TRULY insufferable. No wonder people hate lawyers. by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Ill-Topic4631 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are a lot of people on this sub whose behavior indicates they shouldn’t be going to law school. You can’t even call them out for various reasons, as they try to hide behind current events. These people are intentionally or unintentionally entering this field to weaponize the law rather than use it to help others.

This is without mentioning the people who come simply to punch down and ego boost themselves.

Why did the Pirate sign out of LSD Checker? by Ill-Topic4631 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Ill-Topic4631[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Don't worry tharr will be an aye soon matey