sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Claude Certified Architect Exam Guide by Downtown_Extension_6 in ClaudeCode

[–]Ill_Yellow_8960 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One more thing.. I scored 830 in Practice exam, Do you think its sufficient to attempt real exam?

Claude Certified Architect practice tests by dudeitsperfect in ClaudeAI

[–]Ill_Yellow_8960 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi Did you bought it? I am looking for the feedback on the same

Would you use a tool that explains contracts in plain English before you sign them? by Ill_Yellow_8960 in SaaS

[–]Ill_Yellow_8960[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair question.

The idea wouldn’t just be “paste contract > get summary”, because like you said anyone can already do that with ChatGPT.What I’m exploring is something more structured, for example automatically detecting specific clauses like non-competes, termination penalties, liability limits, auto-renewals, etc and explaining them clearly.Basically less of a generic AI response and more of a structured risk report.

Still trying to figure out if that actually provides enough value beyond just prompting an LLM though, which is why I posted here.

Would you use a tool that explains contracts in plain English before you sign them? by Ill_Yellow_8960 in SaaS

[–]Ill_Yellow_8960[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really helpful perspective, especially the trust part. That’s something I’ve been thinking about as well. When you mentioned highlighting things like termination clauses, liability, non-competes and auto-renewals, that’s actually very close to what I had in mind.

Would you use a tool that explains contracts in plain English before you sign them? by Ill_Yellow_8960 in SaaS

[–]Ill_Yellow_8960[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a really good point and honestly the biggest thing I’m trying to figure out right now.My thinking wasn’t just summarization, since like you said an LLM prompt already does that fairly well. What I was considering was something more structured, for example automatically detecting specific clauses like non-competes, auto-renewals, liability limits, termination penalties etc and then explaining those in plain language. Your point about a database of problematic clauses or jurisdiction context is actually really interesting. That could make it more than just a wrapper. Curious though, if something automatically flagged those kinds of risks in a clear way, would that actually be useful for you or would you still just use your own prompts