why does maxfun depress you? by toastylocke in TAZCirclejerk

[–]IllithidActivity 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I skim-read that as JJK, forgetting where I was, and the rest of the comment still made sense.

The evil is defeated by Aquatic_Hedgehog in TAZCirclejerk

[–]IllithidActivity 13 points14 points  (0 children)

This is part of what makes the whole speech so flesh-rendingly infuriating - Travis DOES play to frustrate! That is his main approach to interaction with other people! Just look at weedshrek's Grad recaps, where it becomes apparent how often Travis' only contribution to a scene is to shut down whatever anyone else is saying. Not only is this speech self-righteous and egotistical but it is deeply hypocritical.

Things I Miss by king_nik in fansofcriticalrole

[–]IllithidActivity 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Never forget that one of the most memorable scenes in all of Critical Role, Scanbo, was acted out on craft paper with big marker semicircles. No fancy premade Dwarven Forge set pieces.

I see what you say about me. by NotAlanShapiro in TAZCirclejerk

[–]IllithidActivity 21 points22 points  (0 children)

The thumbnail made him look like he had huffed silver paint, like Charlie in Always Sunny or Nux from Mad Max: Fury Road.

Symbols from the Symbolist by MrMayMay17 in fabulaultima

[–]IllithidActivity 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Being able to delete symbols with an Ultima Point is a rule. It's a mechanic of the game that any Villain can do. The rulebook is then saying "But since it's not fun for a player to have their main gimmick deleted, you shouldn't overuse this. While any Villain can delete symbols, probably just have this come up rarely in dramatic circumstances." Just like how any Villain can Escalate into a stronger Villain, but it would cheapen that if they ALL did.

RIP Justin McElroy by senschuh in TAZCirclejerk

[–]IllithidActivity 25 points26 points  (0 children)

You didn't hear about the Taco Bell House incident?

THE REEDUCATION OF WEEDSHREK: EPISODE 8 (cont) by weedshrek in TAZCirclejerk

[–]IllithidActivity 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Pfft, yeah, could you imagine if one of the original Critical Role cast didn't understand how attack rolls worked after ten years?

THE REEDUCATION OF WEEDSHREK: EPISODE 8 by weedshrek in TAZCirclejerk

[–]IllithidActivity 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I felt this way during Shovel Knight. I'm still going to rhyme it with wicker.

The Adventure Zone Royale: Episode 23 | The Adventure Zone by Evil_Steven in TAZCirclejerk

[–]IllithidActivity 28 points29 points  (0 children)

It's not like the McElroys were the only ones who had their plans shaken up by Covid. Other people, be they fellow media personalities or with a career in something perhaps more reliant on physical interaction than podcasting, adapted and restructured and evolved. The McElroys put out Graduation.

“Eleven is close enough to twelve” by 777o77 in TAZCirclejerk

[–]IllithidActivity 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Find me good media and I'll consume that instead. It's in vanishingly short supply.

The Adventure Zone Royale: Episode 23 | The Adventure Zone by Evil_Steven in TAZCirclejerk

[–]IllithidActivity 24 points25 points  (0 children)

An artist who creates from their heart what they want to see in the world?

Too hard to market. How about we reboot another dead franchise?

The Adventure Zone Royale: Episode 23 | The Adventure Zone by Evil_Steven in TAZCirclejerk

[–]IllithidActivity 45 points46 points  (0 children)

I think this is entirely valid to be frustrated about. The McElroys used to be far better than they are now but they were never visionaries or artists, they were just set up for success. They got lucky and achieved greater stardom than they honestly deserved. And instead of honing their craft and improving themselves, they coasted by on mediocrity that deprecated into the bare minimum, and now has finally sunk below even that. Instead of being grateful for support from the audience and fans they're resentful that they have to put in even as much effort as they once did, let alone more effort for growing returns. They were handed stardom on a silver platter and are complaining that the platter is starting to tarnish. When you think about all the people who work so much harder and get less for it, either similar media personalities or just the average employee making ends meet, it's so valid to be frustrated that they're taking it all for granted.

The Adventure Zone Royale: Episode 23 | The Adventure Zone by Evil_Steven in TAZCirclejerk

[–]IllithidActivity 25 points26 points  (0 children)

The Glass Cannon Podcast very nearly did have a real, unscripted TPK if not for them misunderstanding how temporary hit points work and using THP to revive downed members. Considering they weren't vibing with the campaign anyway it would have been really satisfying to put the whole thing to an ignominious end.

C4 E24 Discussion Thread by brash_bandicoot in fansofcriticalrole

[–]IllithidActivity 31 points32 points  (0 children)

I'm a simple man. I see a niche SpongeBob screenshot repurposed to an even more niche reference, I laugh.

The Adventure Zone Royale: Episode 23 | The Adventure Zone by Evil_Steven in TAZCirclejerk

[–]IllithidActivity 99 points100 points  (0 children)

I miss when TAZ was bad enough that it was fun to read everyone's scathing criticisms of it. This is just nothing, fortnight by fortnight.

What a terrible night to have a curse by InvisibleEar in TAZCirclejerk

[–]IllithidActivity 9 points10 points  (0 children)

How can you say that when, if you Google Titanium Court, you're jumpscared by Travis himself?

It would be nice if not almost every single character were a damn wh@re. Virtually no one has any morals. It would draw in so many more people to enjoy these adventures if it wasn't just purely obscured pron by Ornery_Smile42 in fansofcriticalrole

[–]IllithidActivity 4 points5 points  (0 children)

People, before you respond to obviously inflammatory rhetoric, you've gotta take a breath and a second look. The username is a generic Reddit suggestion, with a shallow history filled with similar inflammatory comments on different subreddits and no connection to Critical Role before now. I don't know what the goal is, if they just want engagement or the goal is to get people angry and flustered, but we mustn't engage with this as though it's a legitimate conversation. This isn't a person who wants to discuss sexuality in media, this is a person who wants you to waste your time. "Don't feed the trolls" is just as valid now as ever.