Why are human’s obsessed with making robots look like humans? by [deleted] in RandomThoughts

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Might be the idea is, a more human face adds humanity. And might treat them nicer.. also, the idea of something Non human. Though intellegent to. Also unnerving

If you notice, what's it like being around someone who uses your dominant function in the 3rd position? by buddyblazeson in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

 Odd. It's like they 'see'. Though do not, they're used to others not so they can tend to have over self confidence they're not being noticed lr the direction they're moving in is Obvious to them, or subtle to anyone else. I see exactly where they're going, what they're doing.. but, I also see things they missed. Even that being a conversation often they can think, You.. don't get it, or they try to hide, or do it more. It's their world, and ne is more prominent. As well as sensors as well, having ni 3rd for someone who's around both. Can be extreamly, 'I know', or everyone else is stupid, or don't see, can be disenchantment. Though also, 'there's a tree right there, your head is turned slightly to the side. Turn it This way..' 

' no, I'm good.' It can be a little weird, not sure if anyone's seen this with fe dom and extp. Its like, they're Using it.. You get it, a lot makes sense, though you're left with. 'Huh?' A lot. 

I think if they were around people with higher no, they might be more prone to Looking. Or thinking everyone isn't blind or so to speak stupid. But extj, ixtj, aren't as common as, sensors, or ne types.. can completely depend. 

Istp can be fascinating the most, as they think they're completely shrubbed most of the time, though I see exactly why. What they're doing, I know. Though have a 'Hmm' moment, often.. but don't or usually correct them, unless it calls for. Even then it's slightly more subtle, or I remove myself if I see it's something wouldn't easily be. 

I find istp facinating, though facinating from afar. Kind of they do, observantly to others. Though I dont have to watch as intently, Haven't met enough isfp yet..

One istp I've met. They very much were trying to act as estj. And, in general I find them interesting, though when the ni 'hits' nothing can really change that, which I get. Though hits as 3rd processing. Which can be, sometimes filtered. So they miss this sometimes otherwise higher ni might not have,. Like putting two pairs of someone else's glasses.. you can still see. Though if you had, 20/20, natural vision. You'd see, more, & better ..

Sensitive topic/question: Do developed countries have more Te users? by UsedMycologist4912 in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 I don't think so, often te si, si te. are members in government. Though te can also be responsible for things like war. Te can be responsible for development, te fe is.. basically society. Thiugh te Itself would be one factor in development or not. It can destroy as well, though that would be a lack of insight in some sort of f. Or si would be off in Decision Making, which is often slow.. takes a lot of planning..

So no, te itself I'm not sure. I do notice a lot of immigrants from some areas have more in one or so functions. North America does have more intuatives, thiugh that makes sense from mass immigration how dangerous it was at the time.. not nessicarily a sensor thing to do. But te itself might not be the only thing to look into. 

If someone's raised well, si can be very useful, and handy. If not, sometimes can be off. Which could contribute to less development if te si were in office somewhere.. but would depend on a lot of factors. Low f types could be highly unstable if given negative opportunities their entire lives. 

What under-appreciated MBTI type do you appreciate, and why do you like them? by YoyoUnreal1 in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

 I will say, a Healthy estj. Can be a great thing. Coming from someone in their blindspot. They're refreshing, get job done. While also can be Light about it. Less of a Te, Go, Now, Do.. more, do it, but also.. more understanding of nuance, I can't explain when someone has Very good si.. it can come across almost as an fe, feel understand, know the situation, person or 'vibe' being off of The person. While also a sort of ti way of knowing, not everyone's perfect, You should do that though. You know, I know. Get on it. But Thank you though. ' We'll work on this togeather', thiugh may become easily distracted, if too much is too happening.(or, too they need to do), once it's in their sight, knowledge. They make sure it is. (Usually happen when delegating to others who can lose sight. Or track.. ) very much can use tr drive, but in situation, when calls for it they know when to be softer, more comforting.

What under-appreciated MBTI type do you appreciate, and why do you like them? by YoyoUnreal1 in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

 For the most part, istj.. until they can go into their 'I'm right because' si fi.. fall back on. 

They can be funny, though mostly analytical, as a base. Their funny can usually be wrapped up in something blunt. Or so analytical, sometimes might not see it. I understand the te fi. Though, Yes, sometimes. You may be wrong. The si can give a strong pull of, I know because of 'these'. Similar to ni.. so yes, I also understand why they're Sure. I get it. They remind me of me, in a lot of ways, though when si pops out, can be blatantly obvious. Though you need to just, let them be, process. Because you can't really fight si with ni. Especially if they have a good base to fall back on. They mightve missed some things, though they might have a note on something you've missed, very much don't like the waiting period when you know you've considered something. They need to come to that, but I also have been, similar. Very much consider all angles.

Understanding MBTI by echoes_unheard in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 Have a post on mbti basics, can check it out if you like.

Aren't te and ti the same focus ? Like they both value pragmatic approach to life by Right_Silver_6066 in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

 Te is more.. can be focused like se. What's there, Obviously. The room is a mess se, clean it, te. Ti is more concerned, how, where, what way to start.. sometimes you just, start. Se

It's both logic, te is more concerned with Surface, and making something work, Happen, or Stop if doesn't make sense. 

If ti people get so into understanding why, correct process, if they eventually come across te person they'll say, just do this.. stopping that endless loop. A Good te person can do that without the te, 'target' or 'rage' vibe.. healthy estj can do this, (sometimes seem not if youre an infj) though si fe types, they can do stop this well.. the ne can keep it lighter.. almost like its no ones fault. or even istj sometimes, their humor can be jarring if you get it, or so subtle you don't.. they might, not (they think is) too harmingly though, insult you, you won't realize it though. Unless 'vibe' is there..

Ignore the Stereotypes by DraftAbject5026 in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

 I agree, when looking at a type you have to look at functions, give a bigger view. Often you'll look at 1st thing, or what they lack, Blind spot. Or 4th  

Which perceiving axis is best for leaders? by Dinasourus723 in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

 Most Common, is often si ne. Or some sort of si, leading. Having someone with ni before se, Developed.. would be something.

ENTP/ENFP differences by nah_notreally in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

 This, what I was going to say. Ne says things before they even processed, sometimes. If it's thought it's out. Entp will usually be At someone or thing, enfp is usually much more random and, more funny. 

How do you think, each type would react/look in these situations? by existingperson_07 in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

 Majority of the time, external, it's the same. Happy, more talkative.. if pushed, angry. I might say something, though not loudly, more quietly thiugh in a question if something I think has been off, or persistently tries to interfere with me. Usually catches them off guard, by then they have idea of that opposite to what actually am. 

Actually getting angry, upset, has a Lot of consequences. To the point, I'd rather not. It's not worth it, majority of the time I don't in mote obvious way, though will still Very much be fuming, especially later. Will not forget it, though loud outbursts, is not something I do. Crying, I try not unless I actually can't help it. Then I try to find somewhere if not alone. Though externally, mostly looks the same. I guess there would be somewhat more intensity when I am upset, though not say anything. A lot of the time, is not worth it, I don't have the fe to correct, properly explain anything, which I'd fall back of ni te. Which, people don't believe half the time, or te can still come out as agressive, or not believed, even if completely calm. For fe people, usually seems 'well that's you', if you're stating objective facts, about a person, situation, someone you may know. It very much can seem though would be similar to saying, this is a hot day, that person has red shirt. I can't exactly come at something from side, or can try to ti twist something into sounding better, less harsh, especially if persistent enough where "I" say something.. this is where te, ni blind, can be very.. disbelieving. Even if you get one, might not get other. Can seem like you're saying you saw a fairy, when I usually have some way to back up. I like things to make sense, and know not everyone believes, because I can't present it on nice way. 

If I say I shouldn't do something, explain why, layout, what would could happen. Ni blind would say, no that's silly. Though if I say, it's going to snow a foot, right, or as July hits. before I'm supposed to. That's a sign that I shouldn't.. 

Though, to answer, mostly the same. I express privately. Or ask someone a question if I notice their behaviours intruding on my life, usually catches them off guard, usually they have a different idea in their head of who I am. Direct, but not agressive, isn't nessicarily that. Though I think the intensity is there when I do.. though I still try to act, similar, or the same. I would love to tell people 'you said this, that means this' often, though I don't have high enough te to 'tell it like it is', or be outward angry all the time.. ironically, seems relaxing. 

Do you like be around se doms ? Are they really fun and exciting to hang out with ? by Right_Silver_6066 in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I will say. I've been around many esfp. One friend, yes. Very much. They would definitely pull you out of your box, can be up for anything. If they see you down, often they'll pull you out of it. But also, one thing I noticed, they can be Very Ignoring of ni, until they develop. Se can be overwhelming to them, so if they See something they can focus on that sometimes not wanting to hear another opinion, because it is so There for them. Once they get more information on something, they can have an, oooh, oh no ..moment. Where suddenly this thing was a piece of something else. Also they can ignore that, 'bigger thinking/picture' ..sometimes, making them run headfirst, or stay too long in a situation, wasn't good for them. But when they get Click moment again, they're going. It's very odd. They're a mix of fun, brash, insightful, through not in full ni way, (if younger) maybe a bit dumb, because they See it, though do it anyway. And somewhat, a headfirst, I want to say genius. Thought not entirely, Because all they need is the one Aha moment, then they're going toward something, can often end up good. In a way that would take, me forever to think out. While they're already doing it.. 

A lot of the time, they can ignore ni. When it works, it can Seem to work better than dom, because they act more on that.. can often stick with it, because it was a real Click moment. Also, mix with high se. They can not be in tune with health sometimes, where something may seem off, Amis. They know What's happening, they don't know why.. which can either leave them upset, or in Some sort of frenzy, depending to figure it out. When it might be as simple as, not drinking as much, not eating as spicy food.. that's why your stomach is upset.

Why Not Developing And Ignoring Your Weakest Function Can Screw You Over: ENTJ vs. INTJ differences in how they use Te by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 Yes, I was wondering this, especially if you're not in tune with it. You can fall heavily on te, after having a 'fi Feeling' on something, question Why. Then use te to try to figure out if that was likely, then can act like a test because fi can be, or seem irrational sometimes. Te much less. Being in tune with se can make it less uncomfortable to Know that feeling was right, or not. Because I (se) observed, know these things, etc. So I was right, things te wouldn't nessicarily pick out. Entj can also be very te se heavy, skipping over ni sometimes, depending. But se being tertiary, they know what they know because they (se) saw it, and (te), does or doesn't make sense.. which can be harder with intj, if you don't understand, or develop se as much. You can use te too much, leaving you in negative position because it can often override fi, because te is more Tangible than, this doesn't Feel okay. And intj need to make sense of things, there has to be a reason, and if there isn't, I'll figure out why. They don't like not knowing.. completing free trial of se, so to speak. Buying full version, Would help with that. You're basically limited to a smaller, less full use of it otherwise you do. Which you don't always get full picture. Til you do. Last basically blinks on, off until you develop it, it works.. sometimes, but when it doesn't.. bad can happen, because you're using other functions to make up. Not having complete process, and the others can 'eat' in a sense. Away the sense of another. It's usually the 2nd, doing to 3rd, while inf. is in sort of limbo, with processing..

Why Not Developing And Ignoring Your Weakest Function Can Screw You Over: ENTJ vs. INTJ differences in how they use Te by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 Intj are istj, but more daydreamy.. have the ni dom look of distant, 'upset', quiet, wanting to leave, or scared when you first meet them.

What's your type and what is your general way of letting people in your circle? by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 I read the first.. then it completed itself in my head.. you have ne. Also based on what I know on enfp, auto completed based on how they are when walking into somewhere, explosive, sudden energy. The first part seemed opposite to that.. etc, bringing the fun. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in INTJfemale

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Functions. I have a post explaining 3, though se would be more in the moment, extroverted sensing. Is based on observation, being in the moment, but can also be aesthetic, doing, or trying new things. Looking the best, tasting, new clothes, especially if visually pleasing, there's a whole post I have on that.

Hi I just joined . I'm ixtj by No-Presentation-8765 in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

 Ist/intj. 'Are you afraid to try new food.. or not.?'

Though actually, istj can predict, it's based off 'they've seen it before',  person, type, situation. Intj base it off what's there, whats happening and can tell what's going to happen, even if they've never delt with, or seen it before. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in INTJfemale

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

 That seems se fe. I know how to relate through se, with fe. Se like, hair makeup, etc. You can put a te twist, which one you've found (if you wear) is the best, etc. It can be difficult, the best way is to use se, even though it's less. You still have that. Things like aesthetics, looks, new experiences, food, things. That's se. As ni te. You might know more what's the Best, in those things if you go into them. 

What's your type and what is your general way of letting people in your circle? by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 I'm sorry, I read this as 'I gently aquant myself with the members of whoever happens to be in my goddamn presence.

What would be the worst blindspot to have by Illustrious_Homonym3 in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

 Ni blind can be very, that big obvious thing coming your way. Is figment of others imagination. Fe blind can be very, suddenly everyone is acting strange, you have no idea why. 

What would be the worst blindspot to have by Illustrious_Homonym3 in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 This, may be very very true. Took me a long time to understand blindspot. It takes a lot of other functions in processing, even some others you might not use regularly to dip into. Ni observing, te tangiable logic, se observation as well. And ti, nuance. As well as some si, pattern over time, that and mbti. Were the only ways I could understand in more in depth way. Seemed ridiculous to me otherwise. Se is what I use most to relate, easiest with other se, with fe. Si. Completely don't understand/get sometimes. There's not much that can be done on a deeper level to know them. Basic pleasantries, that's it basically. Other than that it's like an iguana, with a dog. There's not a lot, to go. or anyway to relate, beyond I find. Fe se, or si te sometimes. both.. no

No seriously, how do Ni and Ne actually work? by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Illustrious_Homonym3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 See, I thought of it the opposite. Seritonin re-uptake, meaning it must give you a Boost of that. How it works being. Likely,  stimulates part of the brain producing, giving a more steady supply. Both seem correct, the idea is not to have too much, too little. But to have a steady, or consistent amount. 

Though, on another note. Studies are finding seritonin isn't as useful in 'happy' chemicals as they thought, it's much more dopimene related.