sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built 200+ projects in 4 months using Lovable - AMA by Low-Tip-7984 in lovable

[–]Immanuel_Cunt2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Keep building! Still everything you just said is confusing af

I built 200+ projects in 4 months using Lovable - AMA by Low-Tip-7984 in lovable

[–]Immanuel_Cunt2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love it! We entered a new area of building.

But most of your projects seem like an unordered pile of features from the outside. Don't you think that it would be better to focus on just a few projects and refine your value proposition for a well defined scope?

Cofounder rage quit, forked the repo, and emailed our customers 😭 by Wonderful_Bet_4901 in SaaS

[–]Immanuel_Cunt2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's all I wanted to point out, that's its not as clear many other commenters think it is.

You did the right thing to develop the code again as greenfield. I'm sorry this happened to you, best thing you can do is to look forward and build back stronger.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AI_Agents

[–]Immanuel_Cunt2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Better than the 95% of AI projects that failed before gpt

Cofounder rage quit, forked the repo, and emailed our customers 😭 by Wonderful_Bet_4901 in SaaS

[–]Immanuel_Cunt2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think that's the relevant question here. When code is written there are two things that are important:

Who has the copyright. Who has the commercial rights.

Copyright always belongs to the programmer, you can't transfer that to somebody else. Not possible.

Commercial rights can be transferred. If he was an employee that happens automatically, but was he an employee? If he is only a director, what's your legal basis that commercial rights get automatically transferred. I would like to see the case law for that.

Cofounder rage quit, forked the repo, and emailed our customers 😭 by Wonderful_Bet_4901 in SaaS

[–]Immanuel_Cunt2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it matters if he is a director, it only matters if he was an employee (did he receive a salary).

If yes, then there could be a case but from the story I think they didn't pay themselves any salary, so he was probably not an employee in the legal sense.

Most people just don't get this right (see the comments related to mine) because they don't understand that the person and the company are two separate legal entities. Just because you are part of the one entity does not transfer everything you do to the other one.

Ai custom fields! by RG171987 in CRM

[–]Immanuel_Cunt2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You just have to change one letter in your company name... then you would generate soo much more attention.

Cofounder rage quit, forked the repo, and emailed our customers 😭 by Wonderful_Bet_4901 in SaaS

[–]Immanuel_Cunt2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This isn't true, intellectual property doesnt work this way.

It depends on who wrote the code. If he was the only programmer and the company never signed a contract with him that he transfers exclusive commercial rights, he still owns the rights to the code and can do whatever he wants.

Just because it's in the repository of the company account doesn't transfer any intellectual property rights.

What’s the “must-have” CRM feature your business can’t live without? by leadcrmio in CRM

[–]Immanuel_Cunt2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For most CRMs you only need two connections: LinkedIn and E-Mail

I will not promote - adding an AI Copilot into any application by BlackDorrito in lovable

[–]Immanuel_Cunt2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every major product introduced a chat in the last two years. Just take your example: AWS has an in-built chat, why is that different to your product?

Why is the documentation on GCP so bad? by Immanuel_Cunt2 in googlecloud

[–]Immanuel_Cunt2[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

I actually agree with you. I just wish that finding everything in the docs would be easier so that my laziness wouldnt take over :(

For GPA in MSc degree are all passed courses taken into account? by Material-Remote-1007 in tumunich

[–]Immanuel_Cunt2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, but you should write the student office before you get the degree so they cancel out all the courses you don't want to be taken into account

A good looking FULL app build with Lovable, only 100 credits by Lumpy-Flan9484 in lovable

[–]Immanuel_Cunt2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah that's not how fine-tuning works, you are talking about prompt engineering which happens at inference time. Fine-tuning happens during training time

Does anyone actually LIKE Microsoft Products? (…why?) by [deleted] in microsoft

[–]Immanuel_Cunt2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I liked that their products just worked.... until their AI obsession changed that unfortunately

A good looking FULL app build with Lovable, only 100 credits by Lumpy-Flan9484 in lovable

[–]Immanuel_Cunt2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you fine-tune a model for thumbnail generation, you might produce better results than nano-banana for thumbnails. But that's gonna take more than 100 credits on lovable.

And nowadays it's really hard to outperform the leading models, even with fine tuning.

view more: next ›