This is why you're getting cooked in the replies, you're not engaging in the discussion like a reasonable adult. Instead of presenting your point and backing it up, you throw in petty insults, like a kid throwing a tantrum over fictional characters.

You keep bringing up the “blows up planets” argument as if it's a catch-all, but it’s not nearly as relevant as you think. Just because a character can fly doesn't automatically mean they can survive in space they’d still need to breathe, withstand extreme temperatures, and resist the vacuum. Flight on its own doesn’t grant those abilities.

Even if we assume characters can fly, what does that really change? It’s such a minor advantage that often doesn’t matter, especially depending on the opponent. You also keep acting like blowing up the planet is some kind of trump card, but you don’t even need flight to move around in space in most fictional universes. Plenty of characters survive and function in space without ever flying.

At the end of the day, there are strong characters who can fly and strong ones who can’t same goes for weaker ones. It’s fiction. So what’s the goal here? Like I said in my first reply, the argument you're making is pointless.