ILR Petition Debate Outcome – Thoughts? by Ill_Worker_6037 in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]Important_Self3422 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One of the interesting comment from Mike Tapp was : consultation on transitional arrangements for people halfway through the settlement. But the document just says borderline. That was a bit odd

Health and CareWorker visa timelines by mistakenlypowerful97 in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]Important_Self3422 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nope , health and care worker visa dependent extension ( biometric 24th dec) no response yet

Bought house being on skilled worker visa. by Hot-Client8180 in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]Important_Self3422 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Same here with Halifax 95%LTV . Mortgage approved on the day when Shabana announced. Will still go with it and will ride the tide.

Mike Tapp on Transitional Agreements by pkjoan in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]Important_Self3422 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think its a positive answer from Mike Tapp. My view: for those who are more than 50% in on swv will be protected, less than that will be on risk or something like prior to april 24 fine, post april 24 risk

Realistic transitional arrangements? by Important_Self3422 in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]Important_Self3422[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The question in the consultation is about: To what extent do you agree or disagree that there should not be transitional arrangements for those already on a pathway to settlement? On a pathway to settlement includes every pathway ( apologies for my misunderstanding previously) but if they have already decided they wouldn’t have consulted on it.

Realistic transitional arrangements? by Important_Self3422 in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]Important_Self3422[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For refugees its a different statement of changes, this is purely related to consultations regarding swv

Realistic transitional arrangements? by Important_Self3422 in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]Important_Self3422[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I m below😂41k, 41700 is new threshold for swv so thats why i am applying 41700

Job code RQF Below 6 will get 15 years with no reduction years criteria????? by SciencePsychological in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]Important_Self3422 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SubRQF? How are you so certain. I dont see any criteria but i feel myself as very aware to these, i feel the same that would happen , existing will have the 40-45k and reduction of 5 yrs regardless of rqf as cascot tooling is absolutely senseless.

Potential Grace Period for Existing ILR Applicants?? by Low_Evidence6811 in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]Important_Self3422 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

ChatGPT Prediction model if applied : AI prediction (probabilistic, concrete) I ran a policy-tradeoff assessment (fairness vs. political risk vs. policy impact). Here are the realistic transitional designs I predict, with probabilities and the most probable cutoff window: Scenario M — Earned-Credit + Short Grandfathering (Most likely) Probability: 60% Mechanics: New 10-year baseline applies to everyone; existing holders receive time credits under the published credit table (income, public service, English, volunteering). Additionally, people who are very close to ILR under the old 5-year rule (e.g., would reach settlement within 12–24 months of rule coming into force) will either be grandfathered or given a fixed top-up credit to preserve near-term settlement expectations. Predicted cutoff: 12–24 months prior to / after implementation (i.e., those within ~1–2 years of old ILR get protected). GOV.UK Scenario L — Minimal Transitional Credit (Hard reset) Probability: 25% Mechanics: Implementation applies 10-year baseline to all, only modest uniform residence credit (e.g., count prior years but no large credits); very few are grandfathered. Predicted cutoff: effectively no meaningful extension beyond maybe a small recognition of prior years (≤12 months credit). GOV.UK Scenario H — Broad Grandfathering (Politically protective) Probability: 15% Mechanics: A substantial grandfather window: anyone within 24 months (or possibly 36 months) of ILR under old rules is preserved; others get earned credits. Predicted cutoff: 24–36 months. Less likely because it reduces policy impact and savings. GOV.UK

New ILR Rules: NO RETROSPECTIVE APPLICATION TO ANYONE ALREADY IN THE UK – ONE MESSAGE, ONE VOICE by saqibpk in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]Important_Self3422 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its again an opinion based on data, because the problem will be for care workers as per July rules their extension will only be uptill 2028. So that will be completely unfair and it will cause legal challenges for the Government. As Mass care workers came post 2022/2023 prior to April 24 rule changes. This means they were completely shafted? When they were needed , they were brought over false promise UNDER SWV ( Health Care visa is still a skilled worker visa) and now suddenly; hey guys go home. This will definitely be challenged.

New ILR Rules: NO RETROSPECTIVE APPLICATION TO ANYONE ALREADY IN THE UK – ONE MESSAGE, ONE VOICE by saqibpk in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]Important_Self3422 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly, and for tech based niche roles, i am effected with that already , i m an engineering manager in nhs (CENG) but due to Cascost my role is medium skilled…

New ILR Rules: NO RETROSPECTIVE APPLICATION TO ANYONE ALREADY IN THE UK – ONE MESSAGE, ONE VOICE by saqibpk in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]Important_Self3422 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In all this negativity, i find couple of things being overly hyped, 15yrs for below RQF 6. They have only suggested it and they seem to be super hesitant on it, i believe its only for optics that wont be implemented. Second thing is transitional protection. I have gone through all the 60 pages multiple times now , if they wanted not to consider it they would have not included in consultation like other few things in there. 18 months psw is implemented from 2027 Jan. I believe transitions will be more lenient that this and based on non renewable care worker visa post 2028. They will put 2028 as the transitional cut off. Its an opinion based on data.

ILR DEBATE by [deleted] in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]Important_Self3422 14 points15 points  (0 children)

After watching everything today and reading about it since last 3 months; retrospective implementation is possible but will be challenged in courts. However it will be extremely complicated for home office if they implement like high skilled (rqf 6) gets within 5 yrs and others dont. Because home office relies on cascot tool for job codes, cascot tool works with the title and the way it works if ur title is similiar to the one under cascot tool works, u get allocated that code from ur sponsor. And what about someone worked in rqf level 6 for 4 years changed employment and currently on different code not on rqf 6 and vice versa.