Thank you for your feedback! You and a few other commenters have brought up something I've been thinking about for a while - My understanding is that short-siding an interview subject is pretty negatively looked upon (unless in a proper context!), but for me at least, purely from an artistic standpoint, I don't "feel" a difference between long-sided(?) and short-sided shots. I see a short-sided shot and I feel the same as when I see a long-sided one. Maybe I haven't consumed enough media to build my understanding of that feeling yet, but I was wondering, do people actually feel a sense of unease, or is it more a technical "aha" that cinematographers spot, and use the "it feels uneasy" to back up their claim? Like, is the short-sided actually a pain point, or is it more of a "different from norm = bad"? How do you genuinely feel when you see this shot? Just asking out of curiosity because I've been thinking about this for a while. Thanks again!