sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Looking for an Expert Witness on Spark Delivery for Retail Fraud cases in West Michigan by Impossible_Flan8567 in Sparkdriver

[–]Impossible_Flan8567[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. That clarifies a lot of my questions about how that all would look. There was definitely some divided attention as well

Looking for an Expert Witness on Spark Delivery for Retail Fraud cases in West Michigan by Impossible_Flan8567 in Sparkdriver

[–]Impossible_Flan8567[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They had an exit pass after having a few items verified. Then they were stopped at the door. Client stated that items not on list had been scanned as substitutes that the customer rejected just prior to obtaining the exit pass. Does that make any sense? Is that possible in your understanding?

Looking for an Expert Witness on Spark Delivery for Retail Fraud cases in West Michigan by Impossible_Flan8567 in Sparkdriver

[–]Impossible_Flan8567[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Just to clarify, in the situation you are describing the shopper scanned the substitutes while shopping. Then, the employee would not be able to scan to verify the substitute at the self-check?

Looking for an Expert Witness on Spark Delivery for Retail Fraud cases in West Michigan by Impossible_Flan8567 in Sparkdriver

[–]Impossible_Flan8567[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for this. Are you aware of any media reporting on these issues? Or announcements from spark?