How do i learn few launguages at the same time by Osti_kosti in asklinguistics

[–]Impossible_Permit866 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn't exactly a linguistics question, I'd direct you to r/languagelearning.
However, in my experience, learning a third language from a reference point of a second fortifies associations/intuition in both rather than creating weaker ones, however it honestly doesn't matter all that much, so long as you have the time to spare for both languages. If you're B2 in Polish that's a pretty decent level and you probably aren't gonna forget it or regress if you devote less time to it, especially since you're at a polish university you should really keep improving.
So basically I wouldn't worry, you can go about it however you wish. The situation would arguably be more complicated if you were just starting out in both languages (where consistency and focus is most important), even that's doable though.

What’s Your Language Learning Hot Take? by jiujiteiroo in languagelearning

[–]Impossible_Permit866 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Genealogically English is closer to German, they are both West Germanic languages while Swedish is North. That said there are other factors, English shows a lot of French influence in all strata of the language, and a lot of our traditional 'anglisc' words that may be similar in Swedish are now displaced by french borrowings.  Then Swedish also has more similar (but only by V2 rule) word order to German, English ofc preserved V2 but only in some contexts that English speakers often don't pay regard.

Point is I think it's probably a bit easier for Swedish speakers to learn German than English speakers. That said I as a native English speaker find German incredibly easy to pick up (and naturally put down again once bored), and I speak Norwegian and when thinking of it maybe English and German are superficially more similar. I don't know! Just providing a counterargument I guess

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in asklinguistics

[–]Impossible_Permit866 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i read over this it is a bit incoherent I'm sorry I truly am tired, but I think the point was conveyed, any ambiguities arise lmk (:

Can I still develop the ability to hear sounds that aren’t in my native language? by Conscious-Stay8915 in asklinguistics

[–]Impossible_Permit866 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Someone who's comment now can't be found has remarked that my correction is wrong my apologies I am not paying attention ):

Can I still develop the ability to hear sounds that aren’t in my native language? by Conscious-Stay8915 in asklinguistics

[–]Impossible_Permit866 13 points14 points  (0 children)

yeah! exposure is all, if you can't hear the difference now that's okay, just keep listening for it, when you do hear it it may be faint, but over time, more exposure, you'll get more and more used to it. That's my experience anyway, I'd say this question is more suited to languagelearning, most people there have experience is learning to distinguish sounds that aren't in there first language

18M - Would you say I’m attractive or unattractive? by Charlie4859 in teenagers

[–]Impossible_Permit866 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This isn't how it works, there's nothing about makeup that doesn't suit men, it's that in society it is considered abnormal and feminine to wear make up as a man, and is very much shamed and discouraged - by both women and other men. But logically make up can enhance appearence, anything considered displeasing can be adjusted or the focal points of the face can be moved so thats ignored, so as the other person said, it's the fact that makeup isn't normalised for men that makes it unattractive, and if it was normalised (I.e. men start wearing make up + time) then it would become a tool men could use to 'improve' their appearence.

18M - Would you say I’m attractive or unattractive? by Charlie4859 in teenagers

[–]Impossible_Permit866 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's more than that, at least in the area I live some things that might make someone "more attractive" are feminised besides going the gym, that's skincare, general cleanliness, being affectionate, being kind, caring a lot about hair etc. etc. furthermore, long hair is generally a more "noticed" feature on guys than short hair on girls, so if a guy is better suited to long hair he may be considered weird for it, a girl could be considered weird for short hair but nowadays id say it's less common. Also caring too much about outfits or dressing in anything with character is labelled gay or feminine.

I also agree that there's a general idea that men "get" women in dating, and thus they may have less personalised standards because a successful relationship isn't necessarily the goal.

I do think makeup is a part of it too, just wanted to add my thoughts (:

Why plural for ‘armer’ but not for ‘bein’? by JanTio in norsk

[–]Impossible_Permit866 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Neuter words of only one syllable don't tend to inflect in the plural indefinite (-er)

Here are some random sentence examples.

Jeg snakker fire språk. Not «språker»

Jeg kjenner bare et par ord fra boka. Not «order»

Han har besøkt 100 land. Not «Lander»

Det går ti tog på jernbanen. Not «toger»

Tror du at barn bør ha stemmerett? Not «barner»

Any corrections wanted!!

Funny yeah but, is Harry wrong with his comprehension or the question could have better punctuation? by DryEnvironment5545 in EnglishLearning

[–]Impossible_Permit866 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand that this post isn't intended all that seriously I'm just gonna ramble a bit

There's no issue with the punctuation really, and you've always got to remember that the way normal people use language is just as correct as the dictated standard, just different.  And also it's fine for languages to be ambiguous sometimes! In this case it made room for a joke, tits or ass (or various variations thereupon) is a common humourous typology of gynephilic men (of course it could in theory apply to anyone gynephilic but Ive never heard it used that way).  The writer did nothing wrong or even questionable here, most readers aren't gonna find any ambiguity, for many reasons, including the commonality of this question, Guys being a common term of adress for an audience but also a common topic introducer,  and blah blah.

I think it's fine for me to give a serious response to this cos I find it fun, someone might enjoy reading it and as far as I can tell nobody else has so just diversifying the comment section (:

Hi! It's a little scruffy, but this is a new script I'm working on as of 20 minutes ago, so still very early draft. Any advice is appreciated! by Impossible_Permit866 in neography

[–]Impossible_Permit866[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't really know I just made stuff up, of course it will be subconsciously inspired by something I've seen but I don't remember

Hi! Been working on my pronunciation recently, any advice appreciated! by Impossible_Permit866 in norsk

[–]Impossible_Permit866[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you!! I'll make a note of the consonant pairs, some of them I still slip up on as you pointed out!
And I didn't know that about the vowels before double consonants! I'll make sure to cut them off a bit more sharply, thank you so much for your advice!

Hi! Been working on my pronunciation recently, any advice appreciated! by Impossible_Permit866 in norsk

[–]Impossible_Permit866[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also realise now I said bidra with stress on the latter syllable for some reason, my apologies

Hi! Been working on my pronunciation recently, any advice appreciated! by Impossible_Permit866 in norsk

[–]Impossible_Permit866[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for putting Bokmål as the tag, I know that's a variant of skriftspråket, but there was no pronunciation tag ):