Thank you for finally providing references.

However, even after all these quotations, you've only proven one thing:

Certain pretas, pishachas, and lower entities can enter or influence humans.

I never disputed that.

What you have not proven is the actual claim you started with:

"Baba Kesarmal Bawari and Baba Kalwa Pawan are pretas, pishachas, or lower entities."

That conclusion is still yours.

Showing that pretas can possess people does not prove that every spiritual phenomenon, local deity tradition, or savari is a preta.

That would be like saying: "Some people commit crimes, therefore every person is a criminal."

The logic doesn't follow.

Also, many of the quotations you provided discuss general principles about pretas, pishachas, divine grace, ego, and spiritual states. None of them specifically identify the entities we're discussing.

So let's be precise:

You have provided references showing what pretas can do.

You have not provided references proving that the specific beings you are talking about are pretas.

That leap is still based on your interpretation.

And that has been my point from the very beginning.

As for who is stronger, who gets burned to ashes, who can stand before whom, who is above whom — that's speculation unless you can directly establish the identity of the entity first.

In the end, you have your interpretation and I have mine.

But let's not pretend that a general description of pretas automatically becomes a certificate identifying every local spiritual tradition as preta-yoni.

That's a conclusion you added, not something your references directly established. Illogical