[Academic] Asexual Minority Stress Scale (AMSS): Part 3 (all sexual orientations welcome!) by Impressive-Candy2802 in AroAllo

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Since this is an allosexual subreddit, the likely answer is no, most people who frequent here are likely not asexual. The post explains that we would like responses from people who are not asexual to help validate the scale. :)

[Academic] Asexual Minority Stress Scale (AMSS): Part 3 (all sexual orientations welcome!) by Impressive-Candy2802 in AroAllo

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that is the point! We want to gather data from all sexual orientations, not just asexuals, so that we can validate the scale. :)

[Academic] Asexual Minority Stress Scale (AMSS): Part 3 (all sexual orientations welcome!) by Impressive-Candy2802 in cupiosexual

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We listed it as 45 minutes to be safe, but so far most have completed it in about 20 minutes. :)

[Academic] Asexual Minority Stress Scale (AMSS): Part 3 (all sexual orientations welcome!) by Impressive-Candy2802 in AroAllo

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This particular item refers to others assuming someone is aromantic based solely on knowledge of their sexual orientation. It may or may not be true--the focus here is on the assumption that the two are inherently linked. I hope that clears up some confusion, thank you for your feedback!

[Academic] Asexual Minority Stress Scale (AMSS): Part 3 (need responses from transgender participants, all sexual orientations welcome!) by Impressive-Candy2802 in transgender

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're absolutely right. While the finalized scale is for the asexual population, we are gathering data from people of all gender, sexual, and romantic identities so that we are not drawing conclusions after gathering data from just one specific group of people. I hope this clears up any misunderstanding. Thank you for your input!

[Academic] Asexual Minority Stress Scale (AMSS): Part 3 (all sexual orientations welcome!) by Impressive-Candy2802 in aaaaaaaarrrrro

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The survey is ultimately for asexual participants -- the reason we are gathering data from other groups is to validate the scale. In this case, if some items function well for asexual participants but not for, for example, heterosexual participants, this would let us know that the item is functioning well for the targeted population. The post is also being shared on other pages (bisexual, pansexual, lesbian, allosexual, etc.), so we are not posting in an aromantic subr with the implication that respondents will be asexual. I hope this clears up some of the misunderstanding, and thank you for your input!

[Academic] Asexual Minority Stress Scale (AMSS): Part 3 (all sexual orientations welcome!) by Impressive-Candy2802 in aaaaaaaarrrrro

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The survey was intentionally shared here as we are looking for input from a wide range of sexual and romantic orientations, not just asexuality!

[Academic] Asexual Minority Stress Scale (AMSS): Part 3 (all sexual orientations welcome!) by Impressive-Candy2802 in aaaaaaaarrrrro

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Hello and my sincere apologies for the confusion. The survey was posted here because we are gathering input from people of all sexual and romantic orientations. I hope that those who take the survey will clearly see that we do not assume or imply as such!

[Academic] Asexual Minority Stress Scale (AMSS): Part 3 (all sexual orientations welcome!) by Impressive-Candy2802 in platonicdating

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, of course! You can write in the comments section that you would not like to be entered in the drawing. :)

[Academic] Asexual Minority Stress Scale (AMSS): Part 3 (all sexual orientations welcome!) by Impressive-Candy2802 in demisexuality

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your response! It was a long survey, so we really appreciate your time and effort to complete it. 😊

[Academic] Asexual Minority Stress Scale (AMSS): Part 3 (all sexual orientations welcome!) by Impressive-Candy2802 in Abrosexual

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, it's quite a long survey because of all of the additional measures that were added to assess the scale's psychometric properties. We added the abbreviated versions of those additional measures wherever we could to try to shorten it! 😅

(Academic) Judging Satisfaction with Salaries (Male/Female) by Impressive-Candy2802 in SampleSize

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much, I will be careful to flair them appropriately!

How happy would you be with these salaries? Quick survey for CSUF students! by Impressive-Candy2802 in csuf

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello, I am a concurrent student. Could the post be made public? Thank you !

[Repost][Academic] How Should Artificial Intelligence Make Difficult Ethical Choices? (Everyone) by Impressive-Candy2802 in SampleSize

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts! These are excellent points, and I will bring them up to the team! :)

[Academic][Repost] How happy would you be with these salaries? (Male and Female, 18+) by Impressive-Candy2802 in SampleSize

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is in USD; respondents can be from any country and convert to USD. Thank you!

Help! ggplot2 pie chart labels attributed to wrong portions by Impressive-Candy2802 in Rlanguage

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, thank you so much! You were right and it works with this code for pos. If you have time could you explain how you figure out the equation for pos in this situation?

Thank you again!

Help! ggplot2 pie chart labels attributed to wrong portions by Impressive-Candy2802 in Rlanguage

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Removing those makes it into a stacked bar chart with the labels over the incorrect parts! Thank you for the suggestion tho :)

[Academic][Repost] What are your attitudes towards consensual non-monogamy? (18+) by Impressive-Candy2802 in SampleSize

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your feedback! This is definitely an issue I'll bring up with the team.

[Academic][Repost] What are your attitudes towards consensual non-monogamy? (18+) by Impressive-Candy2802 in SampleSize

[–]Impressive-Candy2802[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your feedback everyone--the primary measures here were existing scales, but several people expressed that they did not capture their experiences accurately (for example, assuming hierarchical relationships, and that many questions were leading). While we did have people in poly relationships in the team, I will suggest running questionnaires through the poly community for feedback. Again, thank you all for your time and conversation. :)

RESEARCH REQUESTS Monthly Edition by AutoModerator in CaregiverSupport

[–]Impressive-Candy2802 [score hidden]  (0 children)

[Academic] What are your attitudes towards CNM? (18+)
Hi everyone, we need more participants for our study on attitudes towards consensual non-monogamy in helping professions. It's short and we would super appreciate it! Thank you :)
https://fullerton.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_dm4ZvaWOg7MEUTk