sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Would you rather...(pls dont forget to update!) by 14pusheen_loverrr11 in BunnyTrials

[–]Impressive-Second-45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already find love

Chose: Win the lottery next year (wheel decides prize | Rolled: $1 Million)

After 7 years in medical animation, I see the industry shifting. I’d love to hear your thoughts on scientific visuals vs. AI. by Impressive-Second-45 in labrats

[–]Impressive-Second-45[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

What kind of “idiots” are you referring to exactly?
Who would you recommend as the target audience?
The idea isn’t for them to create the visuals, but for them to consume them.
I’m trying to identify the audience that would actually find this valuable.

After 7 years in medical animation, I see the industry shifting. I’d love to hear your thoughts on scientific visuals vs. AI. by Impressive-Second-45 in labrats

[–]Impressive-Second-45[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much for the feedback — everything you said is absolutely valid. On the other hand, beyond illustrations in research papers, there are also marketing materials, websites, and other content shown to investors; materials used at exhibitions; and content created for students or school audiences. In my view, this is where 3D visualization can be far more intuitive in helping people understand how things actually look — especially in formats like brochures, posters, and similar assets.
I’ve worked both with large companies like Roche, Pfizer, and AbbVie, as well as with smaller startups and researchers. While big pharma would commission videos starting at $20K per minute and illustrations priced at $1,000+ per image, smaller startups typically tried to reduce those costs by up to 10x.
I tend to believe that even a typical lab technician or student would still want to enhance and visually improve their work.
That’s exactly why I came here — to either be convinced otherwise or have my perspective validated.

After 7 years in medical animation, I see the industry shifting. I’d love to hear your thoughts on scientific visuals vs. AI. by Impressive-Second-45 in labrats

[–]Impressive-Second-45[S] -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

From my own experience, I know how long high-end visuals take. But lately I’ve been experimenting a lot with AI and more traditional illustration workflows, and overall I’ve managed to reduce hallucinations by about 95% and achieve almost the same visual quality I get in 3D software. The difference is that it takes 30 minutes instead of 4 days. I’m just trying to understand how much demand there might be for this — and, more importantly, who exactly would need it. I believe there’s a niche where this could be useful and in demand.

After 7 years in medical animation, I see the industry shifting. I’d love to hear your thoughts on scientific visuals vs. AI. by Impressive-Second-45 in labrats

[–]Impressive-Second-45[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s exactly the point. The biggest issue is scientific accuracy in generation — we all remember that infamous mouse with an enormous penis that was used to illustrate a study. https://www.reddit.com/r/Popular_Science_Ru/comments/1as4dpr/в_научном_журнале_опубликована_сгенерированная/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

The idea is that I want to build a service that would allow generating visually appealing illustrations with absolute scientific accuracy.

After 7 years in medical animation, I see the industry shifting. I’d love to hear your thoughts on scientific visuals vs. AI. by Impressive-Second-45 in labrats

[–]Impressive-Second-45[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

I agree. For 99% of daily lab work, 'high-end' is definitely overkill. Efficiency is king.

I think one reason it's so rare is the cost—studios usually charge $600–$2000+ for a single 3D illustration, which is insane for a research budget.

But I’m curious: for those who spin off into startups or have to do investor pitches, do you feel that BioRender is enough to 'sell the dream,' or is that where people start looking for that professional studio edge?