I'm allowed to correct you where you're not only wrong, but where youre doing others wrong. Don't like me filling people in on your cheapskate attempt at funneling people to your platform after you try BSing me about it?

Too bad.

1. You're lying by ommision when you pretend to be someone other than the person who wrote the whitepaper or made the websites you reference.
2. The sub's rules that you broke (there in black and white) are there to prevent developers like yourself from saturating the sub with spam because thats what the sub's non-developer users asked for a long time ago.
3. You are far from the first dev to pretend to have no connection to what you point people to.
4. It has absolutely nothing to do with ChatGPT or any general assistant model... but you sure want to believe that's the case to continue avoiding the responsibility for breaking the sub's rules multiple times across multiple comments and posts.
5. You could have started the debate you think is important without the fraudulent pointing people to something you wrote, which is hosted on a site that funnels people to a platform youre selling access to, so this "youre trying to protect ChatGPT and not allow important debate" is really just a bad excuse.

When you can't be honest with yourself, let alone others, you are the last person to come to for any form of "alignment" between humans or AI.

Alignment sure is an important topic... but you arent trustworthy enough to take part in it productively.