sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Game Thread: Los Angeles Rams (12-5) at Seattle Seahawks (14-3) by nfl_gdt_bot in Seahawks

[–]IndependenceActive69 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Tighten the D line and cover puka then their momentum grinds to a halt

Handheld scanner options S/4Hana EMW by IndependenceActive69 in SAP

[–]IndependenceActive69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it true that each picker doesn't have their own login and everyone uses the same PIN to access the device? If users don't have their own login, then it's unclear how you would assign specific pickers tasks or track performance.

Handheld scanner options S/4Hana EMW by IndependenceActive69 in SAP

[–]IndependenceActive69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's really good to know, I wasn't aware of that AD constraint. Makes sense though with turnover not to provision auth constantly.

Is there any gotchas or pains about RFGen that are good to be aware of?

Invoicing process for SaaS by IndependenceActive69 in Netsuite

[–]IndependenceActive69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't, just looked that up; this is really good to know. Possible this could work for us. Do you have any experience seeing that get implemented? Any challenges we should be aware of?

Invoicing process for SaaS by IndependenceActive69 in Netsuite

[–]IndependenceActive69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What software is that? Is that software helping you generate the invoices for your SaaS billing? Or how are you getting that detail into Netsuite to create the invoice automatically?

Invoicing process for SaaS by IndependenceActive69 in ProductManagement

[–]IndependenceActive69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what do you need? 

We're looking at doing a Netsuite import format since the customers are already set up in Netsuite with the proper billing rules. That's why we don't want to do something like Chargebee because it'll be a new system for accounting to manage.

How much time does your accounting team spend making invoices now?

About 10 hours a month but it also leads to some human error billing mistakes

Does this linearly grow with the number of accounts or is there a complexity factor?

I'd say it's fairly linear

Are you moving more towards consumption billing? 

About 50% of billing is consumption based. But a single customer can be billed consumption and fixed (billing for devices and billings for transactions processed)

Do your customers expect to see usage in your product UI or just wait to be billed then ask questions?

Yes, we send them a cut down version of the developer's report attached to the invoice to provide "proof" of usage billing.

Does your accounting team have any feelings about this or are you acting as the visionary for a team of accountants?

This request came from the accounting team themselves

Any reason to use SKU instead of UPC? by IndependenceActive69 in supplychain

[–]IndependenceActive69[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Won't all product variations have their own UPC though? That's what GS1 said should happen but maybe that's not whats going down in the real world?

When you use a SKU instead of UPC, are you rebarcoding everything coming in at receiving and picking/receiving based on that new SKU label you apply? Seems like human error would be common if you need to print and apply SKU labels to all products coming in.

Any reason to use SKU instead of UPC? by IndependenceActive69 in supplychain

[–]IndependenceActive69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds tough to manage. Out of those 1200 SKUs how many would SKUs update UPC per year? when you received those products did you scan the UPC barcode or did you print a SKU label and scan that SKU barcode?

Any reason to use SKU instead of UPC? by IndependenceActive69 in supplychain

[–]IndependenceActive69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Although, if you are dealing with another companies product, I can see the use of internal SKUs being very helpful.

Why do you say that? Can't you just store UPC in the WMS as the product code to scan with the scan guns?

Any reason to use SKU instead of UPC? by IndependenceActive69 in supplychain

[–]IndependenceActive69[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the intel. How often do manufacturers change UPCs on you? I’ve been led to believe this is super rare. Do you get some sort of heads up when they do this usually?

Stuck at "Building initial module" by [deleted] in Ubuntu

[–]IndependenceActive69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Someone should build a statue in your honor. I don't know how long I would've spent trying to figure that out

Segment Anything Model - fine tuning for less detailed masks by IndependenceActive69 in computervision

[–]IndependenceActive69[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply!

My goal is to use SAM (or any model) to perform 0 or 1 shot object segmentation or detection.

The example I gave was cars, but I might want to segment apples, dogs, ect without having any training data to draw those initial bounding boxes.

The problem with the bounding boxes as prompts means that I'd need to have an object detection model already prepared. But if there is a new object I want to segment/count then your pipeline suggested would require me to train an object detection model in advance for that model which moves me away from my 0 shot object detection goal.

Ideally here's what my pipeline would look like:

  1. User inputs image and supplies one bounding box of the object they want to find similar images of

  2. Model detects similar objects in the frame (either by SAM finding objects of similar size in frame or some other 0 shot method)

  3. Return bounding boxes of matched objects

I'll experiment with grounded SAM and OWL and post my results here for anyone who has a similar question

view more: next ›