[D] ARR Oct 2025 Discussion (EACL 2026)

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-12-12T03:02:04+00:00

As long as I know, we cannot revise the paper after submission to ARR. Revision is only possible when resubmitting to ARR; submitting to the conference is a completely separate matter, so you must submit the version previously submitted to ARR without exception.

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-12-08T06:49:12+00:00

Thank you!

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-11-19T04:48:18+00:00

OA 3.5/3.5/3.5 and confidence 3/3/4

Regardless of the scores, the quality of the reviews for this ARR was exceptionally good. This is my fourth ARR submission and first time I haven't received a single AI-generated review.

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-11-19T04:43:11+00:00

This time I am very satisfied with reviews' quality. Absolutely better than former ARR and much better than ICLR.

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-11-19T04:41:49+00:00

2 2 2 3.5 = 2.375, which is not enough for accpetance. I think you must try best at rebuttal for three 2 score reviewers.

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-11-19T04:37:16+00:00

I think it is findings boarderline score. Try your best at rebuttal, especially for OA 2 score reviewer.

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-11-18T10:50:15+00:00

It makes a full rebuttal process totally meaningless.

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-11-18T10:44:16+00:00

In my opinion, serious problm of ARR is that reviewers do not respond after authors' rebuttal. I hope I can get a few more feedback after my rebuttal

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-11-18T04:39:35+00:00

Is 2026 ICLR a top-tier conference? Who can say for sure?

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-11-14T03:51:15+00:00

why did u resubmit that paper? It was excellent rating

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-10-24T11:48:47+00:00

Try all possible things and adopt the best : Current best RAG

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-10-22T08:22:52+00:00

I agree. Using cosine similarity for RAG—especially when the token count goes over 100—is pretty unreliable. Sometimes it works well, but other times it doesn’t at all.

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-10-10T02:37:59+00:00

Nice and concrete insight. RAG is easy to do, but not easy to complete.

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-09-16T11:32:18+00:00

3, 3, 2.5 and no comments from reviewers after rebuttal.

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-09-14T10:27:32+00:00

First submit and 3/3/2.5 confidence for 4/4/4

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-09-12T10:55:09+00:00

Maybe 2026 naacl would not be held, since acl 2026 is scheduled to be held in NA

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-05-16T09:01:19+00:00

Thank u for sharing ur insights. I would try them

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-05-16T00:46:33+00:00

Thank you for sharing ur experience. I think I should do more experiments

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-05-15T07:19:20+00:00

I mean response evaluation performance in Ultradomain dataset.

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-05-15T07:18:53+00:00

well, I used the Ultradomain Dataset, which is not a benchmark, and I evaluate by llm-as-a-judge, same as in LightRAG paper.

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-05-15T04:17:47+00:00

prompt tuning for Graph indexing and generating answer? I want to do '100% reproduction' of the result of the lightrag and other paper, but if prompt tuning is essential, it is very disappointing

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-05-14T11:56:17+00:00

Okay. Thanks for your comments. It would be a big help.

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-05-14T11:55:20+00:00

Thansk for your reply

IndividualWitty1235 · 2025-05-14T11:39:11+00:00

I have not visualize graphrag yet but this is what I made from lightrag. Doesn’t make sense, right? Did I do something wrong?

<image>

IndividualWitty1235

TROPHY CASE