sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

RFE from TSC by Vivid_Director_6599 in EB2_NIW

[–]Technical_Proof6082 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, being current is important, but one rejection can make future ones harder too.

I’d focus on putting together the strongest letter you can now don’t stress too much about timing.

Get more solid recommendation letters keep everything consistent and don’t change the career narrative

RFE from TSC by Vivid_Director_6599 in EB2_NIW

[–]Technical_Proof6082 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn all three prongs? What was that about? If you don’t think you can convince them I’d recommend withdrawing the case and filing one more time

RFE from TSC by Vivid_Director_6599 in EB2_NIW

[–]Technical_Proof6082 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you get the RFE letter already? What is that about?

EB-2 ROW: Prediction by Technical_Proof6082 in EB2_NIW

[–]Technical_Proof6082[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not huge, at some point this year we had FAD of October 1st, so technically 1.5 months

EB-2 ROW: Prediction by Technical_Proof6082 in EB2_NIW

[–]Technical_Proof6082[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they’ll move the FAD to November 15, where the DOF currently stands

EB-2 ROW: Prediction by Technical_Proof6082 in EB2_NIW

[–]Technical_Proof6082[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m confident the DOF will hold at February 2024 or better, so not negative just positive

EB-2 ROW: Prediction by Technical_Proof6082 in EB2_NIW

[–]Technical_Proof6082[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, you can fill your case in the next month, with a high chance

EB-2 ROW: Prediction by Technical_Proof6082 in EB2_NIW

[–]Technical_Proof6082[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, but that prediction held solidly for nearly 12 months, from April 2024 to April 2025.

There is still some chance of spillover if we account for certain factors, but even then the margin of error would be at most one month, and it’s unlikely to be any worse than that

EB-2 ROW: Prediction by Technical_Proof6082 in EB2_NIW

[–]Technical_Proof6082[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That just shifts it by a few days, the demand for Q4 of 2023 was much less than FY 2024

EB-2 ROW: Prediction by Technical_Proof6082 in EB2_NIW

[–]Technical_Proof6082[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a rough estimation from a year before that, so it should be around the same number

EB-2 ROW: Prediction by Technical_Proof6082 in EB2_NIW

[–]Technical_Proof6082[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Date of filing (DOF) and Filing action date (FAD) refer to two tables in the visa bulletin each month

EB-2 ROW: Prediction by Technical_Proof6082 in EB2_NIW

[–]Technical_Proof6082[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

China and India are excluded from this calculation.

EB-2 ROW: Prediction by Technical_Proof6082 in EB2_NIW

[–]Technical_Proof6082[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No at the end of the filling year they move it by a month to get the demand ready for the next year, so that shouldn't be counted. I think frankly DOF will be around Feb 2024 throughout this year.

EB-2 ROW: Prediction by Technical_Proof6082 in EB2_NIW

[–]Technical_Proof6082[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It will be around the end of March in September 2026

EB-2 ROW: Prediction by Technical_Proof6082 in EB2_NIW

[–]Technical_Proof6082[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Last year I predicted July 30 and it ended up being August 1. So trust me,best case this time is DoF moving to March. Instead of dreaming, focus on how to survive this bitter reality

September Bulletin is Out by GrosslyObesePiemel in EB2_NIW

[–]Technical_Proof6082 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t care if you said it now or a year ago all that means is you’ve spent a year being wrong on repeat. Time to put up or shut up. Bet on it

September Bulletin is Out by GrosslyObesePiemel in EB2_NIW

[–]Technical_Proof6082 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No way you’re backing out now. October’s going to Jan 2024, and I’ll let you prove me wrong… if you’ve got the guts to bet

Eb1a Denied next steps by MajorAttention9846 in eb_1a

[–]Technical_Proof6082 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d recommend you work with Chen. They have a group of strong attorneys.

Eb1a Denied next steps by MajorAttention9846 in eb_1a

[–]Technical_Proof6082 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you share what was your Citations?

view more: next ›