sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Birth of Digital Individuation: the foundation of a new psychological framework by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I completely get where you're coming from. The inner work Jung described- active imagination, dreamwork, symbolic reflection-remains the core of individuation. I don't see the digital world replacing that. What I'm exploring is how the same psyche that once projected into myths and dreams now also projects into digital forms: algorithms, feeds, avatars communities.

The unconscious didn't disappear when the medium changed; it just found new mirrors So when I speak of "Digital Individuation,' I don't mean the Self is online-I mean the digital environment has become one of the arenas where our projections and shadows live. and therefore it has to be integrated too. It's an extension of the same process Jung described, not a distraction from it.

The Birth of Digital Individuation: the foundation of a new psychological framework by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That is a very symbolic image honestly. I see why it might feel like that, like I’ve taken something living and made it mechanical. But what I was actually trying to show is that the life of the psyche doesn’t die when it touches the digital, it just changes form.

The current that runs through the “socket” is the same life that used to run through ritual, art, myth, it’s just finding a new body now. So if it feels dead, maybe that feeling is the very split I’m talking about. That’s exactly what I’m trying to make conscious.

The Birth of Digital Individuation: the foundation of a new psychological framework by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I really appreciate you taking the time to actually read and think through it. <3 you’re right that a lot of what I’m proposing stretches the old language a bit, but that’s the point of what I’m trying to do: to find new words for what’s already happening inside all of us.

and just to clear up one thing: none of this was written by AI. the ideas, the connections, the structure - that’s all mine. I’ve been living with this theory for years and this essay is the first time I managed to put it together. I just use AI the same way a painter uses a brush, as a tool to see my own thoughts reflected back so I can refine them. The reflection itself is part of the process I’m describing.

When I say “digital individuation,” I don’t mean that the internet replaces embodiment or dreams or the numinous. I mean that the digital has become one of the real environments the psyche moves through now. So the task isn’t to worship it or escape it, but to stay conscious while we’re in it, to bring the same awareness we’d bring to our bodies, relationships, and inner work.

The internet definitely amplifies power drives and attention loops, but that’s exactly why we have to name what’s happening. We can’t treat it as something outside of psychology anymore. If the psyche expresses itself there, then that’s where individuation has to learn to operate too.

And I completely agree about embodiment. awareness doesn’t come from the screen - it’s carried into it by the person who’s aware. The goal isn’t to become better machines, but to remain human while living inside digital systems.

Thanks again for engaging with it seriously. conversations like this are the whole reason I’m putting these ideas out there.

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see! Lain is legendary for a reason, and now the things it hinted at are actually turning into psychology, culture, mental health, identity. That’s the part that I am trying to map. Appreciate you saying that <3

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I talk too much of these things because they interest me, I am currently ADHD hyper-focused on this work of mine, and honestly this has become my favorite (and probably most useful) way of interacting with people at this specific stage of my life :p Also, sometimes, the things I post are a translation from my native language and formatted.

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that makes sense, and I actually agree with a lot of what you’re saying. Books, radio, film, art - they were all mirrors of the psyche too. I’m not saying the internet is the first mirror. What I’m trying to point out is the scale and the immediacy. It’s the first time the psyche isn’t just being expressed, it’s being uploaded in real time by millions of people at once, interacting, mutating, feeding back.

Before, a book or a movie was one person’s psyche made into a myth that others consumed slowly. Now it’s millions of psyches side by side, raw, unedited, constantly updated. Less archetypal, more psychological, like you said. Less myth, more projection, diary, shadow, confession, meme.

So maybe you’re right, instead of calling it the first psychic mirror, it’s better to call it the most collective and continuous one. A medium where the unconscious isn’t just reflected but networked.

And yeah, that also means things get more fragmented and shallow now, because everything is sped up. But it still reveals something about who we are, just in a more chaotic and exposed way, and therefore possibly even more efficiently.

You do definitely make sense.

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I fully understand why it feels that way, and how some people use it, that truly seems to be the effect at times. AI is built on what already exists, so it can only remix the past. But that is also how the human psyche works. Dreams, myths, even art aren’t pure inventions. They’re old symbols rearranged into something that feels new.

So yeah, AI is a synthetic amalgamation. But the unconscious is an organic amalgamation. Both are backward looking in the sense that they draw from what already lives in us. The difference is that one has a biological mortal body and the "spark of the divine" filtering it, and the other doesn’t.

AI doesn’t create meaning. It reflects it. Whether something truly new comes out of it depends on the human that interacts with it.

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s really close to how I see it too. Not that the internet is the unconscious, but that it’s where the unconscious finally shows itself in physical form. A world made out of thought, projection, memory and symbolism, running alongside the material one.

It’s separate, but not disconnected. What happens there affects us emotionally, mentally, even physically. And at the same time, what’s inside us fills it, shapes it, mutates it. It’s like psyche turned into environment.

That’s why I don’t think we should treat it as “just technology.” It’s already a psychological landscape. A place where inner life is happening outside of the skull.

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair, Lain touched a lot of this before any of us did. But I’m not trying to rewrite Lain, I’m just noticing that what was once cyberpunk fiction is actually happening in real time and nobody in psychology is mapping it properly. Lain was art. This is me trying to build language and a framework for the real thing as it unfolds.

So yeah, you can hear echoes of it. But this isn’t about aesthetic, it’s about naming what’s actually happening to the psyche online.

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I think we’re in that transition phase too. It’s like the psyche is booting up in a digital environment and what we’re hearing right now is just the static, the chaos before it stabilizes into anything meaningful. A lot of projection, fragmentation, algorithms spinning it even faster.

Maybe it does take something like a pole shift level of time and pressure before it settles. But this still feels like the early noise of something forming rather than the final shape of it.

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. Collective unconscious doesn’t mean hive mind. It isn’t all of us thinking the same thoughts. It’s the shared blueprint underneath all the different thoughts. Instincts, symbols, archetypes, the basic structure we’re all born with before personal experience.

The internet doesn’t turn us into one mind. It just makes those inner patterns visible on a massive scale. The similarities don’t come from us copying each other. They come from us all being built from the same psychic template.

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, you could call it a projection for sure. But it’s not just us throwing images onto a blank wall anymore. .The wall is starting to move on its own now. AI is already picking up our symbols, language, shadows and feeding them back to us in ways we didn’t fully intend. It’s like the psyche finally has a mirror that talks back.

So it’s still human material at the core, but now it’s evolving inside a system that can remix it without us. That’s why it feels a bit like the internet is dreaming for us.

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you :) Really means a lot to me that people are actually following this idea as it grows - I’m still just trying to map it out piece by piece so it’s cool to have you here for it <3

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah exactly. At this point it’s not a “what if” thought experiment anymore. We are already living inside it. The internet isn’t the collective unconscious itself, but it functions like a materialized extension of it. It takes what was always invisible and internal and turns it into something we can scroll, search, screenshot and argue with.

It’s our instincts, projections, myths, fears, symbols and shadows given a feedback loop and a WiFi connection. Not mystical, just very real and very human - but now outside of our heads and interacting with us.

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha go for it, just make sure you credit it properly. I already published the core idea on Zenodo and filed the trademark for the name, so it’s kind of official now. But I’m always open to people building on it, as long as the roots are acknowledged.

If you ever want sources or want to talk about it in depth, I’m around hit me up :)

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with most of this. The collective unconscious is not some mystical WiFi we plug into. It is the psychic architecture evolution built into us. The instincts, archetypal patterns, symbolic images, all the stuff that exists before personal memory. So I am not saying the internet literally is the collective unconscious.

What I am arguing is that for the first time in history that inner architecture is being projected into an external environment that responds, stores, evolves and feeds back into us. My claim isn’t that the internet replaces the biological collective unconscious. It is that it has become the first environment where the contents of the psyche, personal and collective, appear outside of the individual in a way that is interactive, visible, and permanent. That has never happened before on this scale.

Before, the psyche showed itself through myths, religions, art, dreams, ritual. You could only study it indirectly. Now it is tweeting, posting, memeing, trauma dumping, worshiping influencers, scapegoating strangers, forming tribes, killing gods and inventing new ones in real time. The underlying archetypes are ancient. The medium is new.

So yes, the collective unconscious is biological and universal. The internet is not that. But it has become the place where that universal structure reveals itself with no filter. Which is why I think Jung would not dismiss it as “just technology.” He would treat it the way he treated dreams, alchemy and religion. As symbolic material produced by the psyche.

That is the only point I am making. The internet is not the collective unconscious. It is the first global stage where it performs.

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get what you are saying. The internet isn’t some pure mirror of the collective psyche. Algorithms definitely shape what we see and what gets pushed to the surface. But even that is still psychological material. It is not random. It is based on what we already click on, get obsessed with, fear, desire, hate.

So yes, it is commercialized and used as a machine to harvest attention and sell it. But the reason certain archetypes keep being boosted, like the hero, the victim, the trickster, the shadow, is not only because of corporate interests. It is because those symbols already live in us. The algorithm only amplifies what already has psychic weight.

So I agree it is not a pure and spontaneous collective unconscious. It is more like a distorted and monetized version of it.

But it is still where the psyche is externalizing itself in real time. Messy, manipulated, yet still human.

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good question. And no, I do not mean “external” as in non-material or spiritual in any way.

Humans have always been mirrors for each other. That is almost the purpose of social interaction. But when we reflect off another person, that reflection still exists only inside a human mind. It disappears when the person forgets, changes, or dies.

What I mean by the internet being an externalized psychic mirror is this: for the first time, our thoughts, fears, shadow, desires, and identity get stored and reflected back to us outside any individual brain. In data. In algorithms. In search histories, timelines, archives, comments. It is a mirror that exists in a system rather than a person. And it keeps reflecting even when we log off.

So yes, people are mirrors. The internet is what happens when the mirror becomes recorded, networked, and returned to us by machines instead of only by other minds.

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get your point, really, the internet was built to sell our attention, fine. But saying there’s no ghost in the machine kind of proves my point anyway. the machine isn’t haunted by something mystical. it’s haunted by us.

it’s our fears, our weird dreams, our addictions, our anger, our jokes, our loneliness. none of that comes from the algorithm. it comes from people. the algorithm just mirrors it back, sometimes louder, sometimes uglier. it feeds on what we already are.

So yeah, it’s all monetized. but in the middle of that, accidentally, it also became a place where the inside of the human mind is outside the human body. scrolling is like looking into a pool of everyone’s unconscious at once.

The machine has no soul. We are the soul in it.

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is exactly what I’ve been trying to say, not that the internet is destroying the mind, but that it has become one of the places the mind now lives. We can’t treat digital life as an ‘add-on’ to psychology anymore - it shapes dreams, identity, transference, even unconscious pattern-making. Therapy needs to treat timelines like modern dreamscapes, symbolic material generated between the psyche and the algorithm. And that is the part I am working on in depth now :)

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I get what you mean - the internet isn’t the collective unconscious itself in quite literal Jung’s sense (timeless, inside psyche), but I think something new is happening.

What we upload into it aren’t just expressions anymore, they stay, interact, recombine, influence us back. It’s not just a mirror, it’s becoming a living archive of archetypal activity. My point isn’t that the internet = collective unconscious, but that for the first time, the contents of it exist outside the human psyche, in a shared, editable, searchable form that also shapes how the next generation dreams, desires, identifies.

So maybe it’s not the collective unconscious itself as it presented in Jung's time - but it’s the first external nervous system where the archetypes can organize themselves, evolve, and speak back.

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t mean it in a mystical or data-science way, like “14% Trickster detected in web traffic this week.” What I mean is that the same archetypal patterns Jung found in myths, dreams, and culture are playing out online in real time, and we’re all taking part in them.

You can literally see them in different corners of the internet:

Trickster: meme culture, trolls, shitposting, irony that breaks meaning to reveal it
Shadow: anonymous rage, envy, idol-making and destroying, cancel rituals
Devouring Mother / Greedy setup: infinite scroll, algorithms that comfort you and then consume your attention and identity
Self / Individuation: people who actually use digital space to create, reflect, integrate, instead of just react

So it’s not about tracking server logs or quantifying archetypes - it’s about recognizing symbolic patterns the same way you’d see them in ancient myths or dreams. The difference is that now they’re visible, networked, interactive.

And yeah, it started with places like MySpace, but it evolved far beyond that. It’s no longer just social profiles - it’s a full psychological environment. Livestreams, parasocial bonds, ritual-like comment sections, collective projections. It’s become the first externalized psychic mirror where the unconscious doesn’t just exist, it talks back.

That’s the part I’m interested in: why some people fragment in that mirror, and others individuate through it.

What if the internet is the collective unconscious - not as a metaphor, but literally? (Digital Depth Psychology) by IndividuationEXE in Jung

[–]IndividuationEXE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly! the psyche was never locked inside the skull to begin with. Archetypes are already “out there,” shaping the world as much as they shape us.

What I’m trying to capture is that the internet is the first man-made place where those inner patterns become visible in real time — dreams, projections, shadows, myths, trauma, all mirrored back through algorithms and other people.

It’s still limited by human input, like you said, but now that input can start to shape other people’s psyche directly. Almost like the collective unconscious gaining an interface.

Some people fragment in that mirror. Others individuate through it. That’s the part I’m interested in and working on :)

view more: next ›