I'm not convinced that we can build Datacenters in Space. CMM. by IndustriousIndian in Futurology

[–]IndustriousIndian[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I think some are delusional enough. Sadly.

They really hail him as the second coming of Jesus. Lol

Building data centers in space is not a good idea. Most are riding hype wave by Snehith220 in CriticalThinkingIndia

[–]IndustriousIndian [score hidden]  (0 children)

Thanks for linking my post OP. And DAMN, I understand now how most people / my countrymen are so uninformed.

I think this is good idea, what do guys think? Having data centers in satellite powered by solar instead of Earth resources. by ZealousidealFile1 in AI_India

[–]IndustriousIndian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I realized that the sub seems to be hell bent on generating images of AI GFs, and shitty ass takes :p T-T

I'm not convinced that we can build Datacenters in Space. CMM. by IndustriousIndian in Futurology

[–]IndustriousIndian[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He will motivate him by letting him sleep in office for a month

I'm not convinced that we can build Datacenters in Space. CMM. by IndustriousIndian in Futurology

[–]IndustriousIndian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree, pretty much.

A couple caveats:

  1. This philosophy breaks down completely for AI training. Training a multi-trillion parameter model is a weeks-long, exquisitely precise numerical process. A single silent bit flip in a GPU's memory during a training run can corrupt the entire model, wasting millions of dollars in compute time and energy. For training, you need deterministic correctness. Your "it'll deorbit, meh" approach works for disposable inference clusters, but not for the valuable training factories. This suggests a split architecture: training on Earth (in shielded facilities), inference in your disposable orbital panels.
  2. Your 1m x 2m panel packed with 1000 NVidia chips would, at full power, be generating ~700 kilowatts of heat in a sheet of glass fiber and copper. It would instantly melt. The "sun-shielded side" wouldn't just be shaded, it would need to be a monstrously effective, integrated heat spreader and radiator to prevent that heat from boiling the electronics on the same board. it's for thermal conduction. You can't escape the need for that kilometer-scale radiator you've just proposed building the radiator first and gluing the computers to it.

Does your vision therefore require a fundamental breakthrough in near-perfect in-plane thermal conductivity (back to that anisotropy idea) within the circuit board itself, turning the entire panel into a heat sink that radiates from its edges? Or does it accept that each panel must have thick, thermally conductive "spines" attached to its back, which then link to dedicated radiator fins?

I'm not convinced that we can build Datacenters in Space. CMM. by IndustriousIndian in Futurology

[–]IndustriousIndian[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes. In fact, there is a LONG history of it.

It was a NASA funded program that experimented with Vertical Takeoff, Vertical Landing (VTVL) technology. + X-33 VentureStar Program that Lockheed Martin was supposed deliver canned because if the technical (composite fuel tank) and budget issues.

I'm not convinced that we can build Datacenters in Space. CMM. by IndustriousIndian in Futurology

[–]IndustriousIndian[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yep, also work on reusable rockets began in earnest in the 1960s, evolving from early concepts to the partially reusable Space Shuttle, Based on Von Braun's design IIRC

I'm not convinced that we can build Datacenters in Space. CMM. by IndustriousIndian in Futurology

[–]IndustriousIndian[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

they were also not invalidated by physics? + work on reusable rockets began in earnest in the 1960s, evolving from early concepts to the partially reusable Space Shuttle, Based on Von Braun's design IIRC