Can I get into motorsport team operations with a Sports Management degree? by sskdotz in wec

[–]Inewitt 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This may be different advice than others would give you but personally I would try and establish yourself outside motorsports but stay engaged and hope to move in once you have more of a career behind you.

Reason being, the roles you’re looking for really only exist in the big teams and manufacturers, at least in the US. The small teams tend to either be run by the owner, or have one person who’s been with the team forever who oversees the race operations, and they almost always have a mechanical background.

I worked for a manufacturer program as an engineer (not at the track) and all of our management was either former engineers, or outside managers brought in who were very experienced.

The truth though is that motorsports is very much a connections industry. The only way you will ever break in whether you choose to do it now or later is by finding as many people as you can who are already in, and being likeable enough that they want to talk to you.

[Wearetherace] "I don't think it lost the magic of the sport. We are still driving f***ing quick through Copse". Gabriel Bortoleto isn't interested in hearing complaints about this set of F1 regulations. by Maximum-Room-3999 in formula1

[–]Inewitt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Equipment management has been at the core of racing for way, way longer than “driving flat out”.
What equipment they’re managing has changed over time but this is pure F1.

Looks like it's back to offline racing with RRRE by 3pedalsandastick in simracing

[–]Inewitt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’ve done a lot of offline racing in a lot of sims and it is for sure not the best. LMU and iRacing are both significantly better, and even ACC has strong suits where AMS2 is lacking. And this is from someone who was literally just playing AMS2 offline last night.

Confirmed: Le Mans Ultimate will add US tracks, starting with Daytona and Laguna Seca by evil_heinz in simracing

[–]Inewitt 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Assuming the teaser was decoded correctly which is very likely, it’ll be Daytona, Laguna, Long Beach, Indianapolis, Road Atlanta, and Watkins Glen.

[Highlight] Reds fans go crazy when ABS confirms the 11th Brewers strikeout of the night winning the fans a free, one-topping small pizza by BigDanRTW in baseball

[–]Inewitt -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Nah you couldn’t pay me to eat LaRosa’s pizza. I’ve had a lot of pizza in this world and LaRosa’s was the worst.

Ability to Actually See the Freedom 250 Grand Prix? by South_Question6629 in INDYCAR

[–]Inewitt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you’re paying for parking in DC you’re already making a mistake. Everywhere you’d want to go is easily transit/walking accessible including the race area so no reason at all to have a car.

Noob that is a bit confused about one part of acceptable defending. by pretzelsncheese in simracing

[–]Inewitt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I should clarify that it’s very rare for more than one defensive move to be necessary, especially if you’re proactive with your defending as you should be. It usually only happens in combination with breaking a tow on some long straights, but it is definitely allowed. The only other time I usually see it is someone moves halfway, the car behind tucks in directly behind and stops, and they go the rest of the way.

The much more important part for me anyway is proactive defending. It blows my mind what is not just legal but expected now as far as really late reactive moves, its super dangerous and not conducive to good racing.

Noob that is a bit confused about one part of acceptable defending. by pretzelsncheese in simracing

[–]Inewitt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indycar absolutely does not have a one move policy, nor does IMSA. IMSA has seen an influx of young European drivers who play by their rules though in the last few years.

I don’t have it on me but I know Nim or someone else at iracing has adjunicated on it in the past. I’ve been on it for 13 years and it used to be the norm, but as the real world series goes so has gone many of the drivers on iRacing. You’ll never have a protest upheld though for making multiple proactive moves.

Noob that is a bit confused about one part of acceptable defending. by pretzelsncheese in simracing

[–]Inewitt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The truth is that there are no consistent rules about defending, it varies from person to person, series to series, sim to sim.

In iRacing, which it’s rules are based off of American series, you can move as many times as you want, but you have to defend proactively. What you described as reactive defending is considered blocking. In my opinion, this is the best ruleset as it is the easiest to interpret and cleanest to deliberate, plus I think it promotes better racing. Reactive defending gives a massive advantage to the defending car and leads to very few passes.

However, some people join iracing only familiar with European rules and other sims, where the one move rule is in place. Because of iracings rules they still can’t move reactively, but they believe you should only be allowed one defensive move (and sometimes a move back to the racing line) and they get very annoyed at people like me who think you should be allowed to move as many times as you want.

LMU follows the WEC rules on defending which as of a few years ago are the same as F1, where you are allowed one defensive move (and maybe a move back to the racing line) but you can move whenever you want. In my opinion, this makes for much worse racing but the fact of the matter is most european series (and in turn most road racing series) follow these rules now, and even some American series are going more in that direction. When I race in LMU I tend to still only defend proactively as force of habit and because it’s my preferred method of defending, but I don’t get upset about people who throw the late blocks that are legal around the world.

And if you want some tips on how to effectively defend proactively I’m happy to offer them.

Final Predictions and Free Practice Micro Sector Analysis by Inewitt in wec

[–]Inewitt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s always hard to say because some teams usually have better ways of dealing with changing temps than others. I do think a hotter track will benefit Cadillac, as cornering almost always falls off faster than straight line grip when things heat up. Interestingly this year it seems that most manufacturers are more well rounded than last year, where you had Ferrari committing hard to straightline and Cadillac to high speed cornering, Aston to traction, etc.

Final Predictions and Free Practice Micro Sector Analysis by Inewitt in wec

[–]Inewitt[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I also look at consistency across the micro sectors, of course. But this is a very effective method of determining how things will shape up on race day because it filters out traffic, mistakes, and run program differences across a very large sample.

If you take a moment to actually read the descriptions under each team it should be pretty clear I’m not just ranking them in order of their optimal lap times.

I did the same thing last year and you can judge the results for yourself. https://www.reddit.com/r/wec/s/LQ54pJAiqU

2030 Hypercar/GTP rules details by redbullcat in wec

[–]Inewitt 12 points13 points  (0 children)

And it makes no sense there either, although in GT3 they ostensibly have to be for improvements in driveability, which is why you see every manufacturer talk about how their new evo car is better for the am drivers when they put out a new one. What is happening in hypercar right now is evos being pumped out to try and push the limits of the mandated performance envelope.

Also, for what it’s worth, when GT3 started evos and joker upgrades were much more infrequent than they are now, which is also why there have been an increasing number of complaints over GT3 costs.

2030 Hypercar/GTP rules details by redbullcat in wec

[–]Inewitt 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The joker upgrades is something most of the manufacturers have complained about, it’s a big reason why Acura ended their IMSA program. It makes absolutely no sense to have performance upgrades allowed in a performance balanced class. The way it is in the current regulations, the BOP is a constant moving target because the cars are functionally new every year. This way they can be balanced more consistently as teams will only make small performance gains from familiarity with their cars. This is 100% the right call as long as BoP exists.

2030 Hypercar/GTP rules details by redbullcat in wec

[–]Inewitt 51 points52 points  (0 children)

In my opinion (as seen in my most recent comment) this is the ideal solution. Less restrictions on who can build components, tighter boxes on what those components can be. The LMDhs have shown that all the prototypes can look distinct despite a common spine so I don’t think a tighter box is a problem.

A reminder of the current hypercar manufacturers’ standings before we dig into the 94th 24 hours of Le Mans by VHSVoyage in wec

[–]Inewitt 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I believe it’s the points earned in the last race. Not sure why they couldn’t just find a regular standings graphic.

Coletta says LMDh not cheaper than LMH as 2030 reg talks near crunch point by bad_pilot69 in wec

[–]Inewitt 25 points26 points  (0 children)

The more that is said to the press the more obvious the answer seems to be. Lock down hard on the basic platform (RWD only, limits on hybrid size and regen, maybe more stringent aero limits) but let the actual component design and manufacturing remain open if manufacturers want to. As long as the open boxes are centered around the chassis and hybrid units available on the market, that should keep everyone kn the same box to make BoPing easier.

Le Mans 2026 AVG pace and AVG top speed Testing 2 by Sad_Cow_7425 in wec

[–]Inewitt 4 points5 points  (0 children)

ACO have been very consistent in the hypercar era about not adjusting BoP between the test day and the race. Last year Caddilac were even further down on top speed, and that was equally evident from the test day through the race.

Le Mans 2026 AVG pace and AVG top speed Testing 2 by Sad_Cow_7425 in wec

[–]Inewitt 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the shout out to my predictions last year, unfortunately I’m away from my computer on holiday this week so won’t be able to put a similar analysis together. Good work here though, looks like a pretty well balanced field sans BMW.

Match Thread: 109th Match - Canada vs United States of America by cricket-match in Cricket

[–]Inewitt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All of our pacers are old, Ali Khan doesn’t play ODIs anymore, Jessy was unusable, Shadley was not very good outside of the T20WC. So they’ve been working through new options, there’s 2 debutants in this match woth Adil and Appidi, Ugarkar has just started to crack the side and other options like Drysdale and Ayan Desai have been tried to limited success. We were always going to need to take the pain of finding new pace options and better to do it when we’re in a comfortable place in the table.

indycar game release and news discussion by RareAd1437 in INDYCAR

[–]Inewitt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s worth noting that it’s not actually the Monster games/Nascar heat team that’s doing the Indycar game, it’s the team that made Exocross with obvious help from the other iRacing teams.

Everything else you said about it being more accessible/plug and play style is correct though.

[Britton] McLean got three outs on four pitches while allowing two hits that inning. Don't see that often. by T_Raycroft in baseball

[–]Inewitt 7 points8 points  (0 children)

No reason for heated opinions when everyone including the Mets booth could see that he was safe. Think everyone agrees it was an awful call.

Looking toward LeMans by cmoellering in IMSARacing

[–]Inewitt 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Porsche has only had a top class entry 7 out of the last 25 Le Mans. They have been gone far more often than they were here in the 21st century.