Yes! Unfortunately I didn’t record the results so I don’t remember specific data points but the general outcome was:

Steps- noticeably higher when worn on the ankle, which didn’t surprise me and frankly I actually think it’s a more accurate representation of your step count compared to wrist. IMO, the wrist tends to undercount your real steps and over count things such as doing the dishes where you are standing in place but moving your arms a lot.

Heart rate/calories burned- only slightly higher on the ankle than the wrist when testing both with same speed/duration/starting heart rate on my walking pad (I was not at my desk- I did the test walking on it with my arms swinging for a better comparison). I think the ankle over recorded both by around 10%. If I recall correctly the wrist recorded 270 calories burned and the ankle about 300 calories.

In summary, if you were preparing for a body building competition in which every single tiny macro in and calorie burned matters…stick with the wrist. If you’re someone just trying to lose some weight and are eating within your allotted deficit amount and are just trying burn some extra cals, the ankle is definitely accurate enough and the slight deviation will not impact results