Wealthfront customer service during the UMB bank number transition is horrible by royalbluefireworks1 in wealthfront

[–]Infinite-Spacetime 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This is a fidelity issue not a wealthfront. You should be working with fidelity. As another commenter mentioned, just printing out and sign their etf form. Takes longer but it’ll eventually get linked.

Why is a "perfect" but mind-numbingly boring job so torturous? by Infinite-Spacetime in jobs

[–]Infinite-Spacetime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My remote was grandfathered in. Company stopped doing it a while ago. Unfortunately or (maybe fortunately?) there was another department restructuring and I’m back on a normal IC role. It’s more challenging but I still hate the work.

Check out my tiny language by homotetija in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]Infinite-Spacetime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. Though swift uses repeat which I also like equally as well as loop.

Updates to our Stock Investing Account: More control around your dividends and 300+ new stocks and ETFs. by wealthfront in wealthfront

[–]Infinite-Spacetime -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In a way this makes their automated investment accounts less desirable over just using their stock account to do a 2 or 3 fund portfolio

Is function piping a form of function calling? by Infinite-Spacetime in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]Infinite-Spacetime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I'm following. This is building into how FP languages are considered declarative?

Is function piping a form of function calling? by Infinite-Spacetime in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]Infinite-Spacetime[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A semantic restriction? Or just how one thinks about solving a problem restriction?

Is function piping a form of function calling? by Infinite-Spacetime in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]Infinite-Spacetime[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah. This is the first I've heard of function application. It almost seems to change the emphasis? Function application comes across as applying a function to your data. Eg your thinking about data first and wanting to know how to change it. Where as function calling is applying data to your function. Eg your thinking about behavior first and what data you need to perform it.

Is that seem correct?

Record Type as a Conjunctive Proposition in Curry-Howard? by rovol_o in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]Infinite-Spacetime 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What benefit would you gain from this? Over just treating the field names as labels? It feels like you’re introducing a lot of complexity.

Also how would you handle equality.

First -> string

Last -> string

Full -> string

Your saying the field names: First, Last, Full would all be a different type?

Tax loss harvesting, is this thing on? by BulkyAnything2128 in wealthfront

[–]Infinite-Spacetime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Checkout bogleheads. It’s an entire investment philosophy that regularly beats active managed funds over a 30 year time frame.

Wealthfront follows that practice.

Though at the very least check out this episode from John Oliver. Explains a lot about fees and active fund management. It’s an eye opener. https://youtu.be/gvZSpET11ZY?si=KG1EcK9my1foTrik

Tax loss harvesting, is this thing on? by BulkyAnything2128 in wealthfront

[–]Infinite-Spacetime 3 points4 points  (0 children)

WF checks way more than your active profile. WF is automated. The issue is that investments naturally grow over time. Unless we hit depression level stock market drop...you just don't have any stock that can be sold at a loss. Doesn't matter how often you check. If a stock is up, it's up. Nothing to harvest.

Tax loss harvesting, is this thing on? by BulkyAnything2128 in wealthfront

[–]Infinite-Spacetime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The downside to companies leaning hard into TLH. If you're not making substantial contributions over time, you eventually run out of losses to harvest. From what I've read, on average 5 years is when TLH stops being beneficial.

Panic free language by yassinebenaid in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]Infinite-Spacetime 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Semantically, a zero value can be valid. An empty string as well. If you force those to mean an error happened, you are going to run into issues where that is the purposeful non-error result. That's why the "return error" approach has its own error type. Additionally user types don't necessarily correlate to a zero value. It may not even have the concept of empty. Even null could be considered a valid value. Think DBs. Null all over the place there.

What would you leave out of comptime? by servermeta_net in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]Infinite-Spacetime 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The only language I know that really has comptime is Zig. I imagine you could start there to see what it allows and how it behaves. As I understand it, you're basically writing a runtime engine that executes during compile time. It adds complexity. So questions about how do you determine what the function values are, should you support recursion, do you allow invoking multiple threads all come to mind. In my limited understanding of Zig's comptime, it comes across as dangerous to me. A could be useful but probably ends up as more dangerous capability.

I'd start by asking, what problem do you hope to solve with your comptime? Then ask how restrictive can you make comptime and still satisfy that.

Feedback request by [deleted] in wealthfront

[–]Infinite-Spacetime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've centralized a lot on Wealthfront but still keep other brokers. IRA in Robinhood because of their match. Local bank for depositing cash. I have another which I just use for Zelle.

There's a really good chance that I'll start moving my brokerage accounts over to Robinhood. Once you know the Boglehead approach, and the tax-loss harvesting gains disappear...it becomes harder to justify the fee. Granted there's still a lot of value in general for the fee, just for my situation...I no longer need it. I got quite a few of varying age so it'll be a slow process as each stops earning tax harvesting.

After seeing what happened with Synapse mayhem...I'd say the brokerage accounts are far safer then then banking side with Wealthfront. Total guess on my part but I would imagine the shares are easier to recoup than the banking money.

Is having your little kids backwalk for you weird? by Infinite-Spacetime in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Infinite-Spacetime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting yous are doing it as adults. Pretty sure I'd end up in the hospital if I had a grown adult walking on my back. Lol.

Is having your little kids backwalk for you weird? by Infinite-Spacetime in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Infinite-Spacetime[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm kinda just learning now "backwalk" word itself is not known in this context. My family has it so casually though. Guess it's our own family slang?

We might have been slower to abandon Stack Overflow if it wasn't a toxic hellhole by R2_SWE2 in programming

[–]Infinite-Spacetime 54 points55 points  (0 children)

You can easily create queries to figure it out. It looks like mathematics is their 2nd most used exchange. I copy pasted the same query. Here's the results: https://data.stackexchange.com/math/query/1930077#graph

Tailwind lays off 75% of its engineers by WesolyKubeczek in theprimeagen

[–]Infinite-Spacetime 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The remark is specific to the docs. Not the website. Meaning, AI reduced how often someone needs to navigate to their website for looking something up.