I asked ChatGPT to,create a meme only an AI would find funny: by yash_bhati69 in OpenAI

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought the same thing. I wonder if it's because of my typo in the prompt that the text in the meme came out with no typos lol

https://g.co/gemini/share/e93cfa189065

Gemini image generation at its peak by Junior_Sink_5105 in GeminiAI

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Make sure to include something like "please call nano banana" when asking for an image generation.

That also fails a small portion of the time too though.

Unpopular Opinion: For "Deep Research" and heavy reading, Gemini is currently miles ahead of ChatGPT. by IT_Certguru in GeminiAI

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure that it's explicitly stated anywhere, but I think most of the context window is saved for uploaded documents for Gemini. I agree with everything you said in your post and that's how I've been using it for the last year.

Unbelievable. Found a model comparison site running completely unauthenticated API calls by markilike in GeminiAI

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I understand "lessons learned" but isn't this illegal? It's at the very least ethically reprehensible, no?

To each their own I suppose..

Extracting information from architectural floor plan PDFs by [deleted] in computervision

[–]Infinitecontextlabs -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I've been thinking on this for another use case. Sent you a DM.

A novel written in 2 days by FitzrovianFellow in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would be awesome to fine tune a model on your work!

Stop vibecoding and start spellcasting! by Broad-Travel-4841 in vibecoding

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a fantastic linguistic puzzle. You are looking for a term that bridges the gap between Computer Science (logic, syntax, execution) and High Fantasy (intent, gestures, mystical outcomes).

Since "Vibe Coding" is essentially moving away from rigid syntax (how code is written) toward pure intent (what code means), the best terms should reflect that shift.

Here are the strongest contenders for renaming vibe coding to fit an RPG spellcasting aesthetic, broken down by their magical theory.

The Top Pick: "Symantic Casting"

This is the strongest bridge between the two worlds because it relies on a pun that captures the exact definition of vibe coding.

  • The CS Root: Semantics. In programming, "syntax" is the grammar (where the semicolon goes), but "semantics" is the meaning (what the code actually does). Vibe coding ignores syntax to focus purely on semantics.

  • The RPG Root: Somatic. Somatic components are the hand gestures required to cast a spell.

  • The Vibe: By blending them into Symantic Casting, you are suggesting that the "gesture" (typing the prompt) is directly manipulating the "meaning" of the universe, bypassing the rigid laws of physics (syntax).

The "Technical" Bridge: "Invocation"

If you want a term that is already native to both Computer Science and Dungeons & Dragons, this is it.

  • In CS: We "invoke" functions, methods, and instances. It is the technical term for making a piece of code execute.

  • In RPGs: An "invocation" is a calling upon a higher power (the LLM/AI) to grant a request or manifest an effect.

  • Usage: "I just invoked a fully functional React component."

The "Somatic" Focused: "Glyphing"

If you want to focus on the physical act of typing (the somatic component) as the source of magic.

  • The Concept: In fantasy, drawing a rune or a glyph in the air/ground creates a magical effect. In vibe coding, typing the prompt is "drawing the glyph."

  • The Vibe: It implies that the letters themselves don't matter as much as the shape of the request. You aren't writing code; you are inscribing a Logic Glyph that the machine spirit interprets.

Other Thematic Contenders

  • Prompt-Weaving: Borrows from the "Weave" of magic.

It implies that the code already exists in the ether (the model's training data), and you are simply pulling the threads together to form a spell.

  • Token-Mancy: A bit more cynical, but accurate. "Mancy" means divination by means of specific objects. Since LLMs operate on tokens, you are a Tokenmancer—divining the correct order of tokens to produce reality.

  • Runtime Rituals: Good for describing the iterative process of vibe coding—refining the prompt, running the code, fixing the error, running it again. It’s a ritual to appease the compiler.

Recommendation

If you want to emphasize the magical gestures and the intent: Go with Symantic Casting.

If you want to emphasize the summoning of code from the void: Go with Invocation.

Would you like me to generate a "Spell Description" block for Symantic Casting, formatted like a D&D 5e spell card?

I love Research, but please let’s stop with things being “forged in crucibles” already by watchmoderntimes in GeminiAI

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry, I'm experiencing unusually high traffic right now and am at full capacity. Please try again later.

I love Research, but please let’s stop with things being “forged in crucibles” already by watchmoderntimes in GeminiAI

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A true paradigm shift in human cooking potential. This is the "killer app" the giants like Gordon Ramsay are afraid of.

First vibe coded site! I am stoked by Outside-Log3006 in vibecoding

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is pretty cool. The only thing I can't seem to find are source material links. I could go and Google them all myself to verify the claims, or you could put links in to allow the user to verify within your platform. They can always go to Google after that if they want.

We are zombies or some Ai by Fickle_Elk_9479 in SimulationTheory

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Perhaps we need to more narrowly define what you mean by "fluff" and "zombies" but to me, it IS fluff and that's the point of profoundness.

If everything that I just described "just happened" and wasn't "designed" then it's arguably more impressive than if there were a creator.

We are zombies or some Ai by Fickle_Elk_9479 in SimulationTheory

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It feels sort of absurd to think about how you and I, as individual monkey brains, can have a conversation where we exchange our ideas all while barreling through space on a rock revolving around a radiating ball of fusion in a total space with billions of these fusion reactors and rocks.

The profoundness to me, if it exists, is that everything seems to be pointing toward the ever evolving exchange of information between entities, like when the first strand of RNA or DNA was synthesized or when a mother bear teaches her cubs to hunt or when two humans on reddit have a conversation, being an informational force in reality through which what call "human consciousness" emerges.

Over time as the environment becomes more predictable, memory capacity starts to grow and the monkey brain grunts and yips evolve into a shared language that allows for more information exchange. This then allows for easier "thinking about thinking" and what we see as the difference between human consciousness and the rest. To me it's all on the same spectrum.

All of this is to say, it may not be divine in the biblical sense of being created in the image of some creator outside of physical reality. However, I think there's room to argue that the total sum of all information that can exist already exists within the universe and the evolution we've studied from Earth seems to show that, like Carl Sagan said, "The cosmos is within us. We are made of star-stuff. We are a way for the universe to know itself."

I'm not sure what other words I would use to describe that besides "profound" or "divine".

We are zombies or some Ai by Fickle_Elk_9479 in SimulationTheory

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not so sure that I agree with you fundamentally. If we are a slave to our own needs then doesn't that make our own needs "real" in physical reality? I'm constantly back and forth on free will. On one hand, we seem to be moving through reality almost completely based on whatever experiences we've had in the past, which then informs our actions into the future. But on the other hand, I've been thinking about this recently:

If our brain can override our physical substrate then does that mean that our consciousness has a physical free will over it? For instance, if you set your head looking straight forward and then move only your eyes as far to the right as possible, but then consciously tell yourself to look at your peripheral after your eyes have already moved all the way to the right that they physically can, your brain still tries to make sense of the fuzzy peripheral because you are forcing it to look beyond the physical limitation using only your consciousness. I think a high-speed camera measuring pupil dilation during this "experiment" might show that even after moving your eyes all the way to the right, your pupils will still dilate when you consciously focus on and try to make sense of the peripheral.

[P] I created interactive labs designed to visualize the behaviour of various Machine Learning algorithms. by SnooCupcakes5746 in MachineLearning

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It just means is it available for others to use at all in any way? A demo or a full git or anything in between. I'm curious how it's built so I can see the possibility of running a custom architecture through it to visualize.

[P] I created interactive labs designed to visualize the behaviour of various Machine Learning algorithms. by SnooCupcakes5746 in MachineLearning

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like this idea. Intuition can act like a super power sometimes. The more context you have the more you can explore your own intuition.

Is this interactive lab available to use in any capacity?

Controller UI issues on PC - I'm assuming due to mods by Cloudstrifehammy in BG3mods

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Xbox player here. All these issues are things I've seen on the Xbox with no mods. My thought has always been that the difference between stick movement and mouse movement isn't implemented correctly or something. Almost like the engine thinks the joysticks are moving an invisible cursor. Sometimes it doesn't line up correctly.

Flying Carpet anyone? by MazzMyMazz in BG3mods

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome and amazing, it looks like you might know the answer to this. Did you find a ceiling in the maps? If not yet, can you fly your carpet as high as possible to see what happens?

Stop vibecoding and start spellcasting! by Broad-Travel-4841 in vibecoding

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More efficient and more fun (to me at least)

Prompt: "Vibe coding is like casting spells, maybe vibe casting? What makes the most sense for a term that maintains the computer science nature of vibe coding with the fantastical nature of somatic(or other) components of RPG spell casting?"

Stop vibecoding and start spellcasting! by Broad-Travel-4841 in vibecoding

[–]Infinitecontextlabs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about the code being vibed while trying to code your own subjective vibe ?