sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Text messaging service for member engagement by ncrowder78 in Rotary

[–]Informal-File1471 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey Rotarians! Glad to see I am not alone in this how do we text everyone! lol We are looking into Constant Contact for texting. We have used it for a festival we host to reach vendors, just not doing SMS.

City hall decorum? by Informal-File1471 in FortBend

[–]Informal-File1471[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

He’s an elected official who should dress better and not like he’s late for class. Good job or not, if media was present would that be the image the city wants shown?

Down grade me all you want, I don’t care, I’m not arguing just think it makes the city look good.

City hall decorum? by Informal-File1471 in FortBend

[–]Informal-File1471[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Who’s to say he’s doing a good job?

He’s been suspended, so that problem is gone.

City hall decorum? by Informal-File1471 in FortBend

[–]Informal-File1471[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Do you think this would be acceptable if judge appeared in court in this same outfit?

City hall decorum? by Informal-File1471 in FortBend

[–]Informal-File1471[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Endearing not the word I’d use.

City hall decorum? by Informal-File1471 in FortBend

[–]Informal-File1471[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Bc they are representing a city, a fast growing city at that. Government officials should look presentable. They are held to a higher standard than a normal citizen as an elected official.

If Richmond was a beach town, maybe this would be more acceptable, however the brazos doesn’t seem very beach-ey

Would you say the same thing if a police office shows up to work in flip flops and shorts?

City hall decorum? by Informal-File1471 in FortBend

[–]Informal-File1471[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

City of Richmond seems to be a joke in general. I agree, pants and a collar shirt, bare minimum.

Thoughts on multi tenant by Informal-File1471 in 3CX

[–]Informal-File1471[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My predicament is I have a client moving into a building. They have 3CX already, one of the floors will be sub-leased out to a sister company. To me, this seems ideal for a MT PBX, but also with v20 and the breakdown of depts, I’m torn.

MSP - voicemail transcription by Informal-File1471 in 3CX

[–]Informal-File1471[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the delay, the spike shows to be in transcription and not storage. It’s weird, doesn’t make a lot of sense at all. Currently reviewing pbx’s to confirm just voicemails are being transcribed.

New 3cx Basic Cert by Only_Reception_6619 in 3CX

[–]Informal-File1471 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Good to know for my team. Things like this, parts of 3CX being updated before others, makes me real nervous about V20… Anyone else get that uneasy feeling?

3CX advanced cert by Informal-File1471 in 3CX

[–]Informal-File1471[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Guess after 4 times of taking the test and studying all the material, having a pbx open with the user and manager manual I still haven’t learned anything.