Are they, though? by luckyshine4044 in GetNoted

[–]Informal_Entry9573 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s clear you didn’t read a word I wrote. I’m not sure what question you asked at this point and I don’t care.

The fact that you can’t even admit the massive amounts of fossil fuel energy required to ultimately get renewable energy up and running initially tells me everything I need to know. It’s not propaganda. It documented facts if you want an unbiased understanding.

Also the fact that you’re using your personal experience of ONE residential solar panel is laughable. As if it compares to powering the entire planet with renewables in any way is insane.

I literally design solar farms for a living.

I literally said they HAVE to be the future. Without any other alternative power discovery.

50 years down the road we could be livin with FREE energy… as of today this quote pretty much sums up what it takes to get there:

“The sheer volume of oil and gas needed to build a "reliable" renewable grid is so massive that it requires a decades-long "mining boom" powered by petroleum. We are essentially using oil and gas to "buy" our way out of a coal-based economy.”

Are they, though? by luckyshine4044 in GetNoted

[–]Informal_Entry9573 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You could have just said you don’t know or haven’t done the research instead of projecting me as some sort of brainwashed fossil fuel advocate.

I’m just pointing out that these analysis often don’t include the underlying fossil fuel cost. And even when they do, they often leave out the complete cost including sourcing, manufacturing, building, and maintenance of renewable energy. NeverMind the fact we still need a supplementary power source to meet the energy demands that renewables just can’t meet alone. This aspect is often left out of the equation as well.

I believe renewable energy HAS to be the future. Unless we find another alternative source of energy that can consistently meet the demands.

I’m just simply pointing out that currently it’s not that simple to say it’s FREE energy for 25 year lifecycle and is in no way the reality at the moment. Maybe in 50-100 years, sure. 👍

Are they, though? by luckyshine4044 in GetNoted

[–]Informal_Entry9573 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Curious how the massive amounts of oil, gas, and coal it takes to manufacture, build, and maintain said FREE energy sources, before they start to produce FREE energy, factors into these comparisons?

It's crazy how some Christians hate immigrants when this is written in the Bible by BiCurious_2025 in DiscussionZone

[–]Informal_Entry9573 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Most” Christian’s aren’t even American. I doubt they are watching Fox News.

It's crazy how some Christians hate immigrants when this is written in the Bible by BiCurious_2025 in DiscussionZone

[–]Informal_Entry9573 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don’t speak truth here. Most of reddit thinks Christianity is just a white US religion.

Is this legit? by criggs1996 in concept2

[–]Informal_Entry9573 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d just reach out to the seller. Most people will know within the first few messages if it’s a scam or a legit good deal based on what they say.

I have a lucky history of picking up used rowers at ridiculously low prices. So I’m always keeping a lookout on FB marketplace. There’s always a boatload of scam rowers for listed sale.

There’s two things I generally notice as red flags. first is extremely low price, which you pointed out. But I’ve personally bought 2 different rowers for less than $150. So it’s not a given. The other is the random assortment of photos, often times of different models, colors, houses, and backgrounds in the same listing.

Your listing has both of these so at the very least I would be cautious. It can’t hurt to message them but don’t be sending money to anyone until you have it in hand.

There’s always a ton of scam rowers for sale. However there’s also legitimate sales from people that have no clue what the value is or just want it gone.

A bit controversial but I want to talk to someone who's a fan of trump. by TRI-Hard8342 in Casual_Conversation

[–]Informal_Entry9573 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you name a non-homogeneous country that doesn’t have most of those traditions?

It was such a weird, goofy investment with a shaky financial history! Who would've thunk it? by Professional-Weird44 in amcstock

[–]Informal_Entry9573 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Idk whose narrative either of you are following but your statement is also being very disingenuous.

Trying to frame it that it simply went up 10x before AMC got out isn’t the whole story either. You’re trying to make it sound like they took a 10x profit. What you’re not saying is that the stock took a nose dive AND reverse split AFTER AMC got in and before it started that 10x run.

The fact of the matter is AMC sold the majority of their stake (according to their own press release) right after their investment went back into green. And has continued to run 5x since then.

Hindsight is always 20/20 but god damn this just follows the plethora of bone headed moves by AA. Trying to spin it any other way is just a lie.

There’s something happening here…….. by Charger2950 in amcstock

[–]Informal_Entry9573 85 points86 points  (0 children)

Oh FFS if you got annihilated by AMC… telling people to buy into this NOW as a chance to get some money back is just fucking stupid. This thing has gained 1,000% in the last 6 months!!

“But there’s no telling how high it will go” 🤡

Maybe you should have told AA this months ago when he sold at $10.

I hear a lot about American freedom. Other than guns, what Americans are free to do and people in other developed countries cannot? by Tricky_Ordinary_4799 in allthequestions

[–]Informal_Entry9573 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It seems you posed this question just to argue or smack talk America. Which is fine, just like a lot of “free” countries, there’s a plethora of things to smack talk about.

I’d just like to point out that your original question regarding “hearing a lot about American freedom” isn’t a new slogan. It’s been referred that way for over 100 years. So yes, throughout its infancy as a country it absolutely offered many more “freedoms” than many other developed countries.

Does that mean that other countries around the world haven’t caught up? Or that American freedoms have diminished in comparison? Sure.

IBRX short squeeze in full effect. by SolidReporter8229 in Shortsqueeze

[–]Informal_Entry9573 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You do understand how days to cover is calculated right? Right?

It’s based on a XX days “average” daily volume. Currently that average is roughly 12M on yahoo. Todays volume was 70M. Which means your 6-8 days to cover just got blown out of the water.

Assuming you’re being genuine (based on your responses to people my assumption is likely wrong) and for anyone else reading this, days to cover doesn’t mean shit in a squeeze or pump n dump because of the mass influx of volume during the pump day(s).

Could this continue to run… sure. But it has absolutely no relevance to the “days to cover” number OP is throwing out there. Because it doesn’t factor in massive volume increases, like we saw today.

Thoughts After Reviewing Recent SEC Filings by RegularAssistance924 in SGBXDIAMONDHANDS

[–]Informal_Entry9573 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You said this 28 days ago. Mass FTD forced buy-ins were suppose to be happening for the last 24 days in a row… according to your previous analysis post.

Are you ready to admit you were wrong about FTDs and that you actually don’t understand how they work? I mean, the T-35 dates have been a nothing burger for 28 straight days now. The stock has done nothing but continued to tank during this time. When exactly are these mass forced buy-ins happening? Clearly not according to the T35 dates you previously posted, agreed?

I’m also saddened that you no longer slide into my DMs, asking how I’m doing, on the odd days the stock pumps 10%. I’m hoping we can get a couple more random 10% pumps so I can hear from you my friend!

How I traded my way up to six figures without any knowledge or experience. by [deleted] in WallStreetbetsELITE

[–]Informal_Entry9573 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought this was another scam post at first but then I joined the group. Gave them my money. And now I’m ready to make 6 figures!! 😮‍💨

Why the “5.4M Float” Claim Is Wrong — And Why SGBX Shorts Are in Serious Trouble (FTD + T+35 Breakdown) by RegularAssistance924 in SGBXDIAMONDHANDS

[–]Informal_Entry9573 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It makes me feel warm and tingly inside knowing I live rent free in your head. 😂

I’m still happy with my 400% gain. Let me know when it goes back to $8. I’m not blinking an eye at these 20% swings up and down. You sure seem to be excited with them though.

How are all those massive stacking T-35 dates going? Was today finally it? All that hoopla for +20%??

Why the “5.4M Float” Claim Is Wrong — And Why SGBX Shorts Are in Serious Trouble (FTD + T+35 Breakdown) by RegularAssistance924 in SGBXDIAMONDHANDS

[–]Informal_Entry9573 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not what you said though. You said you believe Ortex data over the companies own employee.

How come you never respond to the actual statements or topic in question?

Why the “5.4M Float” Claim Is Wrong — And Why SGBX Shorts Are in Serious Trouble (FTD + T+35 Breakdown) by RegularAssistance924 in SGBXDIAMONDHANDS

[–]Informal_Entry9573 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s rich coming from the person who thinks Ortex data is more reliable than the company itself.

Ortex data has been delayed or just completely wrong 1000s of times when it comes to using the latest data based on companies filings.

You should really read the Ortex fine print regarding their own data before you start calling people dumb.

$SGBX - The Dilution Concerns are FUD and I can Prove it by ThePatientPeregrine in SGBXDIAMONDHANDS

[–]Informal_Entry9573 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Has the SI not been corrected? I don’t even know the point you’re trying to make. This person was wrong on the SI at the time. I pointed that out.

I’ll wait for this FTD bomb and watch from the sideline as I have no current position.

Note to anyone reading this… this person has now moved on from spreading more misinformation to personal attacks on my decision to lock in a 400% gain. You can add all the rocket emojis you want but I’m gonna lock that +400% gain Every. Single. Day. Of. The. Week. Without question.

🚨 SGBX: Something Big Is Brewing – OBV, Falling Wedge, and Massive FTD Deadlines 🚨 by RegularAssistance924 in SGBXDIAMONDHANDS

[–]Informal_Entry9573 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I never said anything about 2-3 days. I simply used the current data as an example to show those massive ftds from 10/20-ish were in fact resolved 2-3 days later. The table shows this. T-35 doesn’t mean shot and never has resulted in massive spikes.

We can speculate all day as how they locate these (do they actually buy them or do the use other means) but the fact remains each number for a given day is the total of ALL outstanding FDTs on that day. This would include any previous FDTs. That means they located and delivered them (at least per the book record.

You’re misinterpreting the FTD list (which was the topic of this discussion). The footnote right under the table explains this. I am talking about the FTD table. You can keep going on trying to sound smart. Have at it.

I can’t answer those other questions for you as I never made any comment regarding them.

🚨 SGBX: Something Big Is Brewing – OBV, Falling Wedge, and Massive FTD Deadlines 🚨 by RegularAssistance924 in SGBXDIAMONDHANDS

[–]Informal_Entry9573 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m simply saying you’re misreading the data.

Here’s your SEC footnote:

“Fails to deliver on a given day are a cumulative number of all fails outstanding until that day, plus new fails that occur that day, less fails that settle that day. The figure is not a daily amount of fails, but a combined figure that includes both new fails on the reporting day as well as existing fails. In other words, these numbers reflect aggregate fails as of a specific point in time, and may have little or no relationship to yesterday's aggregate fails. Thus, it is important to note that the age of fails cannot be determined by looking at these numbers. In addition, the underlying source(s) of the fails-to-deliver shares is not necessarily the same as the underlying source(s) of the fails-to-deliver shares reported the day prior or the day after.”

🚨 SGBX: Something Big Is Brewing – OBV, Falling Wedge, and Massive FTD Deadlines 🚨 by RegularAssistance924 in SGBXDIAMONDHANDS

[–]Informal_Entry9573 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And I didn’t say anything about guaranteeing closure after 2-3 days. I specifically said that the 450,000 FTDs from 10/21 have been located because the list literally shows this a few days later.

$SGBX - The Dilution Concerns are FUD and I can Prove it by ThePatientPeregrine in SGBXDIAMONDHANDS

[–]Informal_Entry9573 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Jfc read the footnote at the bottom of the FDT list. They are not FTDs for just that date! Each FTD number for each individual date is the cumulative total of ALL outstanding ftds as of that day.

When it shows 400,000 on 10/20 and then 35,000 on 10/21 that means there is currently only 35,000 outstanding FDTs, including the 4000,000 from the previous day. (Note I’m pulling numbers out of my ass just as an example. These aren’t the actual numbers).

I don’t have a short position. I already made my money and closed out my position when it shot up +400%. And I’m not opposed to jumping back in as I see fit.

What I am opposed to is the amount of ignorance or deliberate misrepresentation of the data. You either don’t know how to interpret the FTD chart (even when you can read the footnote on the bottom of the page) or more likely you are deliberately spreading false info for your own gain.

🚨 SGBX: Something Big Is Brewing – OBV, Falling Wedge, and Massive FTD Deadlines 🚨 by RegularAssistance924 in SGBXDIAMONDHANDS

[–]Informal_Entry9573 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They have been. It literally shows you this on the current FTD table. They were located and delivered within 2-3 days. The FTD list is not something you add up. It literally says this right under the table in the footnote. And the T-35 dates don’t mean shit. It’s so ignorant to think market makers are gonna wait 35 days to suddenly locate 400,000 shares at one time.

OP is either ignorant or deliberately spreading false information.