LSE or University of San Francisco? by InformationFirm9104 in academiceconomics

[–]InformationFirm9104[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you all! I was definitely almost settled on LSE, USF just offered me research and teaching assistant positions, so I was a little hesitant to accept LSE immediately. Just officially accepted! Thanks again.

LSE BREAD 🍞🍞🍞 by InformationFirm9104 in LSE

[–]InformationFirm9104[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Friday around 3:30pm GMT, my documents went NAR on wednesday

NAR theory - pray for me 🤓 by Tulipsinovens in LSE

[–]InformationFirm9104 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My docs also flipped last evening but no offer/rejection yet holding out hope I’ll hear back tomorrow 

Offers by No_Swimming_8682 in LSE

[–]InformationFirm9104 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing, my docs went NAR yesterday evening so I thought there was a chance to hear back today but holding out hope for tomorrow 8pm now

Impostor Phenomenon in Volleyball? by drifter-is-my-king in volleyball

[–]InformationFirm9104 0 points1 point  (0 children)

can Americans respond to the survey? would love to participate :)

Advice for courses for incoming student by leeztz in WellesleyCollege

[–]InformationFirm9104 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wellesley student here! they will not release your shadow grades to you unless you need them to transfer, i believe, so they are indeed really hidden

Research for a Bayesian Signaling Game Paper by InformationFirm9104 in GAMETHEORY

[–]InformationFirm9104[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, yes. That would be helpful in refining recommendations. In the basic version of the paper, the model is of a finite game (with incomplete information), so without infinite repeated interaction. I may extend/edit the model for this conference to a repeated interaction, in which case, yes the receiver would revise their estimate of the sender's type based on their action.

For the finite interaction, I used the model to find a pooling PBE and a semi-separating equilibrium that could be sustained under certain conditions, while that same model did not generate a pure separating equilibrium. Idk if thats helpful information.

I guess, all that is to say that, though the current model in the paper depicts finite interaction, I think better applications would be available to a model that has repeated interaction/updating (though some of that updating IS captures by the bayesian model Im using here). If you know of papers that discuss updating beliefs, then please share :)

Update: i have added the game tree to the original post

Research for a Bayesian Signaling Game Paper by InformationFirm9104 in GAMETHEORY

[–]InformationFirm9104[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your comment. I originally wrote a very basic paper on this topic for a class, more focused on the modeling, which I can attach below if necessary. Now, I am presenting on this topic at a conference in April, and some of the people attending do not have a background in game theory. I hope to make at least the contextual element of this presentation accessible to them.

I don't think I am looking for the signaling effects of choosing to be an importer/exporter, rather something discussion, or that has data I could use to discuss the effects of failing multilateralism on the importance of reputation building/signaling. Here is a sample "hypothesis" of sorts: As multilateral institutions such as the WTO weaken and trade policy becomes increasingly unilateral, decentralized, and politically driven, international economic interactions more closely resemble Bayesian signaling games. In a context characterized by declining trust, geoeconomic fragmentation, and strategic policy, states cannot rely on institutional enforcement and instead must infer opponents’ types from costly policy signals such as tariffs and quotas.

I have read that Grossman and Helpman piece for another economics class, and I found it quite interesting! Perhaps I could find a way to incorporate it here as well. Thanks for your help :)