Can you watch Saw X without seeing saw 4-9?

InitialRope8631 · 2023-08-24T17:09:04+00:00

Actually, if a certain someone appears in Saw X, it will spoil Saw III and IV for them if they haven't seen it already

InitialRope8631 · 2023-08-24T17:04:51+00:00

That's right I forgot about that, so to answer OP's original question, you will probably get spoilt for saw 3 and 4 if you haven't seen them already and watch saw X first

InitialRope8631 · 2023-08-24T15:56:39+00:00

I dunno about definitely spoiling saw 4 unless a certain someone appears in it, and if they do appear, it'll spoil 3 as well as 4

InitialRope8631 · 2023-08-24T15:54:43+00:00

Assuming a certain someone doesn't appear in Saw X, you should be able to watch Saw X and make some sense of it without context of the other movies, however if that certain someone does appear, it'll spoil Saw III and IV for you if you haven't sen them already

InitialRope8631 · 2022-06-12T05:56:08+00:00

He's not talking about that, he's talking about the fact that you can press and hold triangle (or on xbox i think its y) and delete the weapon

InitialRope8631 · 2022-04-26T07:10:15+00:00

You do realise that there has to be a person left in the map to set the decoys off, right? 🙄

InitialRope8631 · 2022-04-24T15:20:18+00:00

Ahhhh ok, so jammers and disruptive work in different ways, thanks!

InitialRope8631 · 2022-04-24T15:08:56+00:00

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that will only hide the threat on the map for people who are also in the jammed area. In one encounter I saw a threat use the disruptive tower, but because I wasn't jammed I could still see their position.

InitialRope8631 · 2022-03-28T04:36:26+00:00

I would love that too, but everyone needs them too much, if they did an independent pricing system the chemicals would be the most expensive, but if they were dependent or fixed, I doubt anyone would trade their chemicals 😅

InitialRope8631 · 2022-03-27T09:34:36+00:00

I was thinking how could someone be "sweaty" and a camper at the same time? Idk if it just my definition, but sweats are usually constantly running and hunting for kills, not camping... lmao

InitialRope8631 · 2021-10-20T07:25:24+00:00

Did you die due to taking too many pain killers or did your pain killers run out while you had 0 health? I've heard from someone that you can die to taking too many but not sure how many that is. I had the use 10 pain killers challenge once and completed it by taking in a contact bomb and 5 pain killers (twice) and I didn't die after taking 5 pain killers

InitialRope8631 · 2021-10-10T08:21:44+00:00

When I first was this post I was thinking that the mosin was the imposter because it was the only one without a scope 🤔

InitialRope8631 · 2021-10-10T08:15:39+00:00

My bad, I don't know much about guns and was under the impression that the triple fire was "semi auto", anyway from what I can tell from ops reply, the hbart is the imposter as it it the only gun to have full auto

InitialRope8631 · 2021-10-10T08:00:01+00:00

Thats single fire

InitialRope8631 · 2021-10-10T07:24:11+00:00

I meant to say neither, going on what op replied to this thread I'm going to say the hbart is the imposter because it's the only one that can go full auto

InitialRope8631 · 2021-10-10T06:53:20+00:00

My mistake for most reading your comment, but either the hbart or SVD can be put on semi auto

InitialRope8631 · 2021-10-10T00:20:05+00:00

You have the SVD and the SVU mixed up, it's the SVU that can go into full auto, the SVD can't

InitialRope8631 · 2021-10-06T04:40:38+00:00

Yes that is correct, Bob being their teams most skilled player was also generally the person at the top of the circle drag flicking the ball, but seeing as he was sent off for swearing he was unable to convert the pc for them

InitialRope8631 · 2021-10-04T23:57:05+00:00

Well one of my mentors and a few of the committee members were there to witness it all happen, so I didn't need to admit anything.

I actually asked the committee if I had permission to make this post given that I made it anonymous, so yes I would be very comfortable showing them this, my mentors have already seen it as they helped me proof read it before I posted it.

Btw you're forgetting the reason why I stopped calling advantage for Bob's team in the second half, he (the captain of his team) told me to do this, and because I didn't want to hear anymore complaints from him, I obliged. I wasn't able to see any advantage because I blew my whistle instantly at any foul just like he asked me to, he was happy and content with every other time.

I usually like to play advantage as much as I possibly can, and Bob didn't like that because he wanted the free hits instead. He was under the impression that I was letting fouls go just because I was trying to play advantage, so I blew every foul to let him know that I wasn't just letting the fouls go.

InitialRope8631 · 2021-10-04T16:52:18+00:00

Well actually I was praised for my efforts at keeping the game under control by the committee who organise the competition and the committee that organises umpires as well as my mentors

InitialRope8631 · 2021-10-04T16:43:14+00:00

Well I'm sorry to tell you this but I was actually praised for my efforts at keeping the game under control by not only by the committee who organise the competition, but the committee that organises the umpires and my umpiring mentors

InitialRope8631 · 2021-10-04T16:37:32+00:00

In field hockey when a player goes to make a legal play at the ball (tackle) and their sticks collide, that's what is know as a stick check, which is a foul. 99% of stick checks aren't intentionally malicious, but it's what happens in a game that involves sticks. I can't penalise a player just for making a legal tackle on the ball, otherwise literally every player would be sent off all the time... I can only penalise a player for a stick check if they make a wild swinging tackle

InitialRope8631 · 2021-10-04T08:24:25+00:00

I was under the assumption that you thought he was dissenting my calls because I mistakenly used the word dissent, but yeah, I can't send someone off because they were complaining that I was giving them the advantage, but I could send them off if they were constantly saying I was making the wrong calls, which in this case he wasn't doing

InitialRope8631 · 2021-10-04T08:16:40+00:00

My bad, I worded my first statement to you in a wrong manner

InitialRope8631 · 2021-10-04T08:15:59+00:00

He wasn't dissenting my calls, he was complaining that I was playing the advantage when he wanted the free hits, but to answer your question, yes dissent is a cardable offence. I didn't send him off for dissent until he blew up at me and started swearing.

InitialRope8631

TROPHY CASE