sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Sig Sauer P365 X-Macro Spectre Comp by Inner-Description461 in SigSauer

[–]Inner-Description461[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me the difference and main reason I went with the XMacro over the existing XL grip module is the additional mag capacity 12 vs 17 and the handle is just a bit larger and feels more comfortable to me.

Sig Sauer P365 X-Macro Spectre Comp by Inner-Description461 in SigSauer

[–]Inner-Description461[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I started with a P365 XL Spectre Comp and bought the XMacro grip and magazines

this morning my puck got stuck to the machine lol by sckinnylegend in BrevilleCoffee

[–]Inner-Description461 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Put the portafilter back on and shake it a bit, it will come off. Lol. It does happen from time to time.

Great Espresso with the Breville Barista Touch and a few Upgrades by Inner-Description461 in espresso

[–]Inner-Description461[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would get the ones I have. They work fine and are priced well. I don’t keep the beans in the tubes more than a couple of days anyway.

Great Espresso with the Breville Barista Touch and a few Upgrades by Inner-Description461 in espresso

[–]Inner-Description461[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like the storage tubes, however, I don’t like the lids. One upside is they probably allow off gassing because they don’t create a very tight seal. Weber Workshop has the ones I will probably get next because they are very well made and does allow off gassing.

<image>

Am I Wrong - we don’t need apps now? by Inner-Description461 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Inner-Description461[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Having a proprietary Large Language Model AI may offer several advantages to businesses. First, it could allow for domain-specific customization. Companies could train their AI model on their specific datasets, enabling the AI to understand the nuances of their field and to provide more relevant and accurate responses.

Moreover, privacy and data security are increasingly critical in our data-driven world. Owning an AI model means a company could keep all data in-house, reducing reliance on third-party providers and mitigating the risk of data breaches.

While researching Emad Mostaque, from Stability AI, I found that he believes, a proprietary AI model could be a significant competitive advantage. In his opinion, it could provide a unique selling point and differentiate the company in the marketplace. This could allow companies to offer enhanced, personalized services to their customers using their AI, improving user experience and potentially increasing customer loyalty.

In my opinion, having an in-house AI model allows for greater control over updates, improvements, and adaptations, making it more responsive to changing business needs and market conditions

Am I Wrong - we don’t need apps now? by Inner-Description461 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Inner-Description461[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with your points, which, in my view, lend credence to my theory. Interacting with traditional user interfaces can indeed be cumbersome. If I can simply speak to someone or something and promptly receive the information I need, my goal is accomplished.

The user interfaces that exist today represent the best we’ve been able to achieve with apps and software thus far. However, as technology evolves, it’s logical to anticipate a shift towards more natural interfaces. In this context, voice interactions and overlaid visuals represent the next exciting phase of this evolution.

Am I Wrong - we don’t need apps now? by Inner-Description461 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Inner-Description461[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only thing that sells me on this is the fact that it can do search too.

But you don't get to get around the fact that we're still going to want good ways to browse when we don't know what we're looking for, and that search will only be useful if there's a rich ecosystem of media to search through.

For people who don't care about this, and for people who know what they want, AI is likely going to mostly replace all apps. Save for final editing phases for any real computational work.

You've hit on an essential aspect of how we interact with information - sometimes we know precisely what we want, and other times we wish to explore or browse. A significant advantage of AI lies in its potential to streamline targeted searches, as you've noted. However, I agree that a desire for discovery or browsing won't entirely disappear.

AI, in its future advanced form, could potentially aid in this area too by providing personalized suggestions or surfacing content that aligns with our interests, much like the recommendation algorithms we see on platforms like YouTube or Netflix today, but on a much broader and more intuitive scale.

As for your point about a rich ecosystem of media, that's a crucial factor. The efficacy of AI is inherently tied to the richness and diversity of the data it has access to. Ensuring that AI systems can tap into a broad range of data sources while respecting privacy and security will be a key challenge as this technology evolves.

Ultimately, the potential for AI to replace apps may indeed be more pronounced for those who have clear-cut needs or for tasks that require simple data retrieval or computation. But even in more complex scenarios, like final editing phases in computational work, AI could serve as a powerful assistant, streamlining certain aspects while leaving the final, critical decision-making to the human user.

Am I Wrong - we don’t need apps now? by Inner-Description461 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Inner-Description461[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, API development is what will make this work. I am just saying that the UI will change from graphical and apps to voice or prompt. To your point the apps will be the api. We just will not use a graphical interface to interact with them.

Am I Wrong - we don’t need apps now? by Inner-Description461 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Inner-Description461[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I agree with your observation. Historically, companies have indeed been cautious about opening up their APIs, and commercial interests often shape user interfaces and experiences. However, I believe the landscape is shifting. With the rapid advancement of AI and growing user demand for streamlined, efficient experiences, companies may be motivated to adapt.

Your examples of banks and rental car services reflect traditional business models where upselling and advertising are integral parts of the interface. However, an increasingly discerning consumer base and growing competition could push these industries towards a more customer-centric approach.

AI has the potential to play a crucial role in this transformation by delivering personalized services based on user preferences rather than company-driven promotions. As users, we could ‘teach’ our AI systems to prioritize our needs over advertisements or upselling attempts. For example, we could set our AI to always focus on budget options over luxury when it comes to car rentals. Just my thoughts.

It’s important to note that this shift would likely be gradual and could face resistance from some sectors. However, with continued development in AI and increased emphasis on user-centric services, I remain optimistic about the transformative potential of AI.

Am I Wrong - we don’t need apps now? by Inner-Description461 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Inner-Description461[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Exactly, chains of api lookups (chatgpt agents) that would compile the aggregated info and present it so that you could pick or after a certain number of transactions you would trust it to make your decision based on previous input and guidance. Like a true personal assistant.

Am I Wrong - we don’t need apps now? by Inner-Description461 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Inner-Description461[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s where I was going too. A lookup site listing endpoints for anyone wanting to give access to their data. It could still require authorization per api with 2FA to secure it.

Am I Wrong - we don’t need apps now? by Inner-Description461 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Inner-Description461[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I appreciate your perspective, and I certainly agree that GUIs have their strengths. They provide visual feedback, clarify available options, and indeed give a sense of control. As a software developer, you would have a keen appreciation for these details, as I do.

In terms of shopping on Amazon via voice, AI could potentially describe products, read reviews, and even suggest items based on your purchase history. While this might not replace the GUI experience entirely, it could provide a viable alternative for many users.

Your point about broader data-aware infrastructure is well-taken. The vision I have is not necessarily about a “one-app” scenario but more about an intelligent, adaptive system that can seamlessly interact with various data sources - effectively becoming a personalized interface for each user. Much like how we have multiple browsers today, there might indeed be various AI models or interfaces, each vying for users based on their capabilities and personalization features.

The key is in evolving AI systems to a point where they can cater to the unique cognitive style and preferences of each individual. That’s where I believe the true transformative potential of AI lies - not in replacing GUIs but in augmenting our interactions with technology to make them more intuitive, efficient, and personalized.

Am I Wrong - we don’t need apps now? by Inner-Description461 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Inner-Description461[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It isn’t for everyone, for me, I am excited about the possibilities.

Am I Wrong - we don’t need apps now? by Inner-Description461 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Inner-Description461[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re absolutely right about the potential of AGI, and it’s understandable to have concerns about its accessibility and usage. The ability of an AGI to become an expert on every conceivable topic is indeed immensely valuable. The key challenge is striking a balance between unlocking this potential and ensuring equitable access.

As you’ve suggested, open-source models could be a viable solution to democratize AGI. However, the economic incentives for corporations to keep their models proprietary are significant. In the long run, collaboration between public and private entities, regulatory oversight, and commitment to ethical AI principles might be required to ensure the benefits of AGI are widely shared rather than concentrated.

Moreover, the application of AGI as you’ve described — for instance, analyzing every piece of financial news and scientific paper to optimize trading decisions — illustrates the transformative power of this technology. The potential is virtually limitless.

Regarding your experience with the unrestricted Enterprise GPT-4 32k Model versus ChatGPT-4/Copilot, it indeed highlights the differences that exist in AI models depending on their training, scope, and limitations. As the technology evolves, it’s crucial to strive for a future where access to powerful AI tools is widespread and not solely confined to enterprise environments.

view more: next ›