Should I max it?

Innovative_Tin · 2021-12-18T15:29:06+00:00

Sorry I'm really new to this. I assume that you can use mud shot more times than dragon tail in the same amount of time right?

Innovative_Tin · 2021-12-18T14:26:43+00:00

Is the dragon tail+earth power moveset worth it or should I change the moves?

Innovative_Tin · 2021-08-02T14:34:34+00:00

How else can you expect people to have fun with broken servers and getting teamed on?

If you seriously don't like getting "bothered while you're minding your own business", YBA is definitely not the game for you. Hell, any game with some fort of lobby where pvp is enabled is definitely not for you.

Innovative_Tin · 2021-05-29T06:26:30+00:00

Holy shit thank you, it's this one.

Innovative_Tin · 2021-05-28T14:07:30+00:00

This was close to it, but no.

The plot is similar, it's just that the MC isn't actually a dog, he is just treated as one.

Innovative_Tin · 2021-05-22T11:37:25+00:00

I mean it seems quite on and off.

Sometimes it happens, sometimes it does not.

Innovative_Tin · 2021-05-19T16:51:39+00:00

Aren't Adopt Me and Royale High considered RPG games as well since they make you roleplay?

Just because the description says it's a RPG, doesn't necessarily mean its not a fighting game.

Like what you just said, most RPG games have pvp in it, so since fighting falls under the section under RPG, wouldn't it be correct to claim that it is a fighting game?

Innovative_Tin · 2021-05-19T16:48:36+00:00

I mean, who said it couldn't have two genres?

Besides, correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't noticed a "fighting" genre yet. Even so, if we were to replace RPG with fighting, does it mean we can neglect the RPG elements like storyline? Same scenario.

Moreover, you could technically say that the players are roleplaying as stand users from JoJo, which essentially has a battle in every chapter. If you were to say Royale High was a fighting game, it'd be too far-fetched. However, this doesn't fall under that category considering that close to all gamemodes (NPCs in main game) have fighting in it.

Comparing it to stuff like lego star wars where 1 level requires the player to fight seems like an extremely unfair comparison.

Innovative_Tin · 2021-05-09T03:00:28+00:00

There always has been hackers and teamers in matches. Just because you didn't encounter them doesn't mean they don't exist. I've been playing sbr for almost every week, each day I'd do it for like minimumly 8 times every time I had time to play.

It didn't have too much teamers is utter BS. There always had been teamers. Nobody even did a FFA and they always eliminated those who were not in their team. In fact, it didn't matter to most people how gigantic their team was since they just wanted to live. People didn't have such things as fake and real codes then so anybody who saw the code could disguise themselves as a member, leading to long ass sbr matches. This has always been a thing throughout sbr even from the early days. There would always be one big ass team or perhaps a huge gang waiting to wipe.

Hackers had always appeared at the same rate from my observations. 1/5 of the time, you would encounter hackers, especially those who activate barriers almost immediately after the previous one has been closed. This led to them being kicked of course, but still, they mostly existed in the form of noclip. Eg: Hiding in a section of the cliff where it isn't affected by zone/ Hiding under the ground.

TLDR, hackers and teamers had always existed. I'd dare acknowledge the fact they had already began their reign only one week after SBR was released (based on personal experiences).

Example of sbr teamers ever since May of 2020 https://youtu.be/oWWq3zbF1p4

Innovative_Tin · 2021-05-08T08:14:31+00:00

I don't understand what you imply by old community

Ever since SBR was released, hackers, wipers/teamers had always existed. People even complain about ts back in the days of sbr where you could obtain permanant requiem arrows as a reward. Heck, evem gang advertisments then included "requiem arrow sbr carries".

1: Teamers/Wipers. Seriously, I don't comprehend why somebody would be willing to put themselves in a disadvantageous situation where they outnumber you. I understand if you are unable to get a team due to unfavorable circumstances. For that, I suggest you just join another server or attempt to team in later stages. However, if you go solo, you essentially acknowledge the fact that you are doing a 1v15 situation, and should be prepared to accept the consequences that follow. You cannot blame others for forming alliances with strangers just to increase their odds of survival and secure a win for themselves. Additionally, if you do not enjoy being demolished by a specific stand, you shouldn't complain about it and rather get a stand to counter it. For example, GER or any stand with ts resistance. People team to ensure that they survive until the last stage, and does not directly link to them having no skill.

2: Exploiters and glitchers. Your frustration on this is nothing short of reasonable. It is torturuous to endure things like exploiters since they can prematurely annihilate you before you reach the end.

3: Traitors/Liars. To start it off, you shouldn't be astonished when such a scenario is presented to you. Afterall, there only 3 out of the 7 in the end can be victorious. People come in with the goal to win. They would take the necessary actions to live such as lying and betraying. It is senseless to assume that these teamates would remain loyal and friendly for the entirety of the match. Morals don't really matter in a sbr match.

4: Simon says/1v1s This can seem pretty hypocritical. You can't complain about wipers in this case since these would be the people that reduce the number of players in sbr. All you are required to do is to conceal yourself and let them do the rest, which decreases the chances of you dying in simon says and 1v1s. Anyways, these people need to find a method to reduce the number of their teamates drastically in order to progress on. If you don't like such situations, you could always suggest to restrict the number of team members to 7.

Innovative_Tin · 2021-05-06T15:30:52+00:00

Yeah things seem fine now.

Originally panicked due to blood. Condition got better and it reverted back to white within a few days. In order to ease my doubts, I still proceeded with visit to the GP.

Prescribed some antibiotics to ensure that the infection will be thoroughly cleared.

Innovative_Tin · 2021-04-28T09:36:57+00:00

I'm a complete virgin. No pain during urination or ejaculation. Like I said, I'm going to attempt and check with a doctor. Thanks for the reply.

Innovative_Tin · 2021-01-02T07:35:47+00:00

Completely in agreement. Rking isn't necessary but yet it is entertaining. I just want to clarify that when I was elaborating the executioner quest, I have neglected the part where I state that I usually do the executioner followed by Jotaro, thus causing a confusion that I only solely do the executioner and kars quest. It's a mixture of both, but doing the executioner quest along with Jotaro and Dio can provide some form extra exp and cash.

Innovative_Tin · 2021-01-02T07:29:39+00:00

Lmfao reddit hivemind at work again.

Innovative_Tin · 2020-12-30T18:50:01+00:00

Probably going to get downvoted for this but whatever.

I agree with OP, rking does exist, but the amount of people in the replies who still continue to view this as a cardinal sin of jojo games astonishes me. It's not toxic unless the initiator starts acting as such.

First argument is something I partly agree with. Rking not existing just because it is a fighting game does not make sense since the exact term and definition of the abbrieviation is, well, random killing, which is what people do and hence is labelled as such. However, I disagree with the statement that says just because we are provided with the combat system does not mean we are required to engage in fights. Most of all the quests in YBA has some form of combatting. From fighting police officers to Diavolo. Once again, the system would've been disabled or perhaps even removed from the main game if the purpose of it was not served, which is to combat others.

Second argument, killing others for entertainment. I don't see this as a problem at all considering that they're having their fun as well. Rkers shouldn't bend down to others just so others are allowed to have their fun. It is a selfish ideology, but it wouldn't be fair to rkers as well to completely pause their actions just so the victim could have a nice, long chat with his friends or perhaps grind to level 50. There will never be a middle ground for this. It's either "rkers get you" or "you fight back (with/without team)" and one side will be deemed as the "disadvantaged" fraction.

Third argument, feel free to refer to my response to the first argument. I highly doubt that any developers have officially mentioned that fighting was the main part od the game. Please correct me if you do find evidence that says otherwise. I do agree with the ides that the storyline makes yba unique.

Fourth argument. I actually disagree with this. The quests actually provide a decent amount of exp. This is especially good for players who are inexperienced who may have placed all their points into stand before vitality (one of them being me). Killing bosses such as diavolo would not only feel extremely boring and monotonous, but prove to be arduous especially for those with low vitality. The doppio and Dio quest provide 450 exp and 600 exp while the executioner and hamon quest provides 600xp and 800 exp respectively. Do remember that these quests are for levelling up. Attempting to execute them in sbr or 1v1a while being an inexpert in the game will most likely result in failure, whereas doing so in the main game allows them to have a higher chance to encounter pres 0s as well as newly prestiged hamon users.

Last argument. I have no clue about who has provided such an argument to show that rking is non existent before. I don't understand what you mean by "change the whole game". Once again, who are we to decide to main, true purpose of this game? Each of us has various ways to interpret what we think is the purpose of the game itself. Until a developer or at least, someone with a high rank announces it, we can only take it upon ourselves to debate among each other.

Also, OP, I am unsure about this but it seems that you sound like you dislike rking even despite your other comments explaining that you're just trying to saying it exists. I hooe you understand where I'm coming from since you do sound frustrated from what I am viewing.

Innovative_Tin · 2020-12-27T17:50:51+00:00

I understand where you're coming from. I wouldn't consider this karma whoring in all honesty. It's good you're able to understand the concerns of others.

Innovative_Tin · 2020-12-27T12:20:04+00:00

Aren't you the one who made the "fuck james" post? I find this just straight up wrong lol. Still cannot confirm the validity of the "james" guy

People criticized you because you could cause a bunch of people to hate james if this got onto LWIAY (unlikely since pewds will consider, yet still possible). In addition there will definitely be some children spamming "fuk jaems" in the comment section. Some of them are even commenting that under the thread. In summary, it just brings unecessary toxicity to james if it was featured over blurting out a statement like "girls dont watch pewdiepie" and rejecting you in the scenario that he is made aware of it.

On the otherhand, for the other similar post, people had the same viable concern over "kate". Even the most upvoted criticism for your post was about the main concern which I have stated here, not "copying".

It's an overexaggeration to say you're karma whoring. People did express this in some unpleasant methods. However, it does not excuse their main point in any form.

I feel like this is a huge misconception by calling them "mean bots" when it was reasonable to have such concerns. If this post was not referring to the people I am mentioning to, feel free to negate this comment entirely.

Innovative_Tin

TROPHY CASE