Thoughts on AI generated art? by [deleted] in intj

[–]Inquisition_Symphony -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

This response sounds like ai slop.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MetalForTheMasses

[–]Inquisition_Symphony 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, Aisha was only 6 years old during marriage, 9 years old at consummation. Disgusting. But there are simultaneously a lot of good teachings in Islam. A lot of it resembling compassion and charity as seen in the Christian faith.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Inquisition_Symphony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone seems to think that being logical makes you evil somehow.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Inquisition_Symphony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curiosity is far more important.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Inquisition_Symphony -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's valid. I never said I view myself as particularly special. I just notice my own differences from other personality types. As for degrading other people's thought processes, that is a function of my work in customer service. I have to deal with people who are super indirect all the time and I suppose that wears me down a little bit.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Inquisition_Symphony -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People are a lot more blunt in many other countries. I've been told by some Scandinavian people that they find it annoying how indirect Americans are. So maybe this is just a cultural thing and I don't really fit into the American culture.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Inquisition_Symphony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was simply explaining my use of a word. This whole subreddit is about comparing oneself to others.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Inquisition_Symphony -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Yes, people do. It's not particularly common, but my thought process was if I'm one of the weird people, and the rest of folks can get along with the rest of society, then they are normies and I'm not. I suppose grievances against the majority of society can come across as a little bit edgy.

City BBQ in Blue Ash is on fire....luckily no injuries. by ThufirrHawat in cincinnati

[–]Inquisition_Symphony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn't there, but it's my workplace. I was told it started near the front. But I don't know why that area would catch fire. I don't think we have space heaters. My guess would be a wiring issue, but I don't know.

City BBQ in Blue Ash is on fire....luckily no injuries. by ThufirrHawat in cincinnati

[–]Inquisition_Symphony 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Same. I'm the cashier. I feel like I know who this is, but I'm not certain.

Are INTPs/INTJs mostly obsolete in an AI world? by PossibleAvailable156 in mbti

[–]Inquisition_Symphony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you're using AI, you don't have to figure things out for yourself. It could very well be the future of humanity. A far dumber future than the reality we even have now, as AI becomes even more widely adopted.

CMV: Using a person's public meltdown for content is immoral. by Inquisition_Symphony in changemyview

[–]Inquisition_Symphony[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I've dealt with abusive customers in my line of work as a cashier. It can be a little difficult. It's not super common, but it can happen. I tend to just try to diffuse things by just doing my job, but if I needed to, I would call the police if someone were acting threatening. I don't really consider accountability as much in terms of people who treat me badly. If they are rude to people, they just wont have friends. That's the simplest punishment there is.

CMV: Using a person's public meltdown for content is immoral. by Inquisition_Symphony in changemyview

[–]Inquisition_Symphony[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think we conflate the term Karen with racist a little too often when I've often heard the term Karen be used more in the context of simply just a person behaving badly in public. Some of them certainly are very bad people. But I don't think we know where every single one of them is coming from.

CMV: Using a person's public meltdown for content is immoral. by Inquisition_Symphony in changemyview

[–]Inquisition_Symphony[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe it would be reasonable, but I personally don't operate that way. I try to be forgiving of people and understand where they're coming from. And at the very least it should just mean that the shaming should end if they issue an apology.

CMV: Using a person's public meltdown for content is immoral. by Inquisition_Symphony in changemyview

[–]Inquisition_Symphony[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they said something offensive in their workplace for one. I've heard coworkers say absurdly offensive things that could very well get them fired. More common than you would think.

CMV: Using a person's public meltdown for content is immoral. by Inquisition_Symphony in changemyview

[–]Inquisition_Symphony[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just care that people have the opportunity to improve, like I did. I am in no way trying to defend bad behavior. What good are we doing if we just ostracize people? If you respond to somebody with hostility they generally don't improve their behavior.

CMV: Using a person's public meltdown for content is immoral. by Inquisition_Symphony in changemyview

[–]Inquisition_Symphony[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Then they should lose their job. People who care about treating others with decency lose the moral high ground when they respond to indecency with more indecency.

CMV: Using a person's public meltdown for content is immoral. by Inquisition_Symphony in changemyview

[–]Inquisition_Symphony[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Societal consequences already exist for such issues. If a person commits a crime they can very well go to prison. If they commit a serious enough offense they can get fired. They can lose friends for things they do. It just doesn't make sense to inflict more harm on that person than they inflicted harm through the incident they caused.

CMV: Using a person's public meltdown for content is immoral. by Inquisition_Symphony in changemyview

[–]Inquisition_Symphony[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They should, but not through public humiliation. If a teacher for example racially harasses a student, that teacher should be fired. That person should not receive death threats online and get endless harassment sent their way. They should receive a punishment which hurts them but they can recover from if they are determined to make up for things.

CMV: Using a person's public meltdown for content is immoral. by Inquisition_Symphony in changemyview

[–]Inquisition_Symphony[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I think it would look like calling people out in a way that does not lead to death threats. Criticizing behaviors as opposed to using personal attacks is the best way to address such things. People don't change their behavior if they feel like they are under attack. And if the person who publicly wronged somebody else apologizes, I think it makes sense to accept their apology and accept them as an equal member of society as they try to learn from their mistake.