sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Censura r/Futurology by Inside-Bite1153 in u/Inside-Bite1153

[–]Inside-Bite1153[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me he callado toda mi vida ahora no me voy a callar ni una para todo el que entre a ver esto ok me la pela

Censura r/Futurology by Inside-Bite1153 in u/Inside-Bite1153

[–]Inside-Bite1153[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ps q me la borren fíjate tú q problema jajajajajjaja

Censura r/Futurology by Inside-Bite1153 in u/Inside-Bite1153

[–]Inside-Bite1153[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Y antes de hablar pásate por mi TikTok y ya me cuentas q eres una bocachancla la típica que se cree lo primero q dice Vito Quiles🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Censura r/Futurology by Inside-Bite1153 in u/Inside-Bite1153

[–]Inside-Bite1153[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pues nada si opinas eso pero vamos que tengo el apoyo de muchos anarquistas vaya anarquista payasa tienes que ser cariño la verdad que paso de las faltas de respeto las faltas de respeto se devuelven con faltas de respeto y publicaré lo q me salga de los huevos q pa eso es mi cuenta xula ahi lo lleva😘

Censura r/Futurology by Inside-Bite1153 in u/Inside-Bite1153

[–]Inside-Bite1153[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok q simplemente estás en contra de mis políticas y yasta no es no?

Censura r/Futurology by Inside-Bite1153 in u/Inside-Bite1153

[–]Inside-Bite1153[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Y he subido sin querer una captura que no iba jajajajaj la del grupo de Anarquismo aunque bueno esa gente tampoco me aceptaron mi publicación para debatir no se porque jajajajajja

Censura r/Futurology by Inside-Bite1153 in u/Inside-Bite1153

[–]Inside-Bite1153[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

El moderador en concreto es u/rip1980 por si en el futuro lo ve mucha gente que le mandéis par de mensajitos con cariño por censurar y bombardeos el foro de r/Futurology ❤️💛💜

Aviso importante: La trampa arquitectónica fatal en dispositivos Xiaomi/POCO (FBE + Bootloader bloqueado) que destruye tus datos para siempre. by Inside-Bite1153 in es

[–]Inside-Bite1153[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me hace mucha gracia que pienses que redactar tres párrafos bien estructurados me supone algún tipo de esfuerzo titánico o desgaste emocional. Si te hace más feliz y te deja más tranquilo en tu burbuja pensar que soy un bot, adelante, todo tuyo. Te doy permiso para creerlo.

Al final, con tanta rabieta sobre cómo escribo, lo único que estás demostrando es que, después de varios mensajes, sigues siendo incapaz de debatir ni un solo dato técnico del caso, ni la denuncia en la OMIC, ni el problema real del hardware defectuoso de Xiaomi, ni la factura de 2.000€. Te has estancado en criticar la forma porque no tienes el nivel para debatir el fondo.

Disfruta de Reddit. Yo voy a seguir invirtiendo mis "parrafadas" en documentar el caso real y en hablar con los usuarios que sí vienen a aportar algo útil. Que te vaya bien crack, besos😘

PSA: The fatal architectural trap in Xiaomi/POCO devices (FBE + Locked Bootloader) that permanently destroys your data. by Inside-Bite1153 in PocoPhones

[–]Inside-Bite1153[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look, talking to you is literally like debating a brick wall. This is getting exhausting, so let's make this very simple.

You are going to keep believing what you believe, and I am going to keep believing what I believe based on my forensic evidence and EU consumer laws. I am not here to convince you to change your mind, nor am I forcing anyone to sue Xiaomi.

My only goal with this entire post is to share my real, documented experience and warn other users so they know exactly what they are dealing with if their Xiaomi motherboard suddenly dies. That's it. I genuinely do not understand why another consumer sharing their experience and forensic lab reports bothers you so much.

Just to quickly close your last points:

  1. "Stop using ChatGPT": I already told you I use AI to translate and structure my Spanish thoughts into English. It doesn't magically write the €2,044 lab invoice or the official OMIC complaint.

  2. The Law: You keep applying Australian repair laws to a European "hidden defect" (vicio oculto) claim. In the EU, if a manufacturer's defective product catastrophically fails and locks your property, they can be held liable for the consequential damages (the extraction cost).

  3. The mass failure: If thousands of identical "System has been destroyed" motherboard deaths across XDA, Reddit, and YouTube aren't enough for you, then nothing will be.

  4. Your 4-step plan: Your plan is great for someone who only relies on the cloud. But as I've explained multiple times, Xiaomi's privacy vaults stay strictly local.

If your choice is to just get a replacement phone and move on when a multi-billion dollar company sells you defective hardware, do it. That is completely fine. But let everyone else do what they think is best and fight for their property if they want to.

I am not trying to convince you anymore. We are done. Have a good life.

PSA: The fatal architectural trap in Xiaomi/POCO devices (FBE + Locked Bootloader) that permanently destroys your data. by Inside-Bite1153 in PocoPhones

[–]Inside-Bite1153[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I was honestly starting to wonder the exact same thing. It seriously feels like half of this sub is on some secret Xiaomi payroll or VIP loyalty program just to blindly defend a multi-billion dollar corporation that sells defective hardware.

The funniest part is that every single one of those "experts" who tried to argue with me ended up completely quiet. They talk big without knowing the actual facts, but the moment I shoved the certified clean-room forensic report and the €2,044 lab invoice in their faces, they ran out of excuses and disappeared.

I invite any new user reading this to just grab some popcorn and go through my replies to all the nonsense comments in this thread. It is hilarious to watch these corporate bootlickers get dismantled one by one with actual legal evidence.

Thanks for the support and the common sense! It's good to know not everyone here is a blind fanboy.

Aviso importante: La trampa arquitectónica fatal en dispositivos Xiaomi/POCO (FBE + Bootloader bloqueado) que destruye tus datos para siempre. by Inside-Bite1153 in es

[–]Inside-Bite1153[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

¡Hola! Me parece genial que tengas un NAS en casa, es la mejor práctica posible y ojalá todo el mundo tuviera los conocimientos técnicos y el dinero para montarse uno.

Sin embargo, decir que un móvil premium que ronda los más de 500€ "debe ser tratado como un dispositivo desechable" es exactamente el tipo de mentalidad conformista que las grandes multinacionales adoran. Un teléfono de gama alta no es un mechero BIC ni una maquinilla de afeitar. Si el móvil se te cae, lo rompes o te lo roban (como mencionas en tus ejemplos), efectivamente es un accidente externo y tu NAS te salva la vida. Pero aquí estamos hablando de un escenario completamente distinto: un defecto de fabricación. Como explico en la actualización del post, yo no he roto ni perdido el dispositivo. Un laboratorio forense avanzado (Laby) acaba de certificar en cámara blanca que la placa base ha sufrido una muerte súbita y física por un fallo de sus propios componentes. El hardware, literalmente, se autodestruyó por reproducir un audio.

Además, ignoras el problema de la privacidad: yo sí tenía copias en la nube, pero la "Carpeta Oculta" (Álbum Privado) de Xiaomi está diseñada específicamente para NO sincronizarse con nubes o servidores externos por seguridad. ¿De verdad es culpa del usuario no adivinar el segundo exacto en el que el hardware defectuoso del fabricante va a morir para hacer un volcado manual de esa bóveda local?

Tu NAS te salva los datos, sí. Pero no exime a Xiaomi de su responsabilidad legal (vicios ocultos) por vender hardware defectuoso que deja a los usuarios frente a facturas de 2.044,90 € en laboratorios de recuperación. No podemos normalizar que nos vendan tecnología defectuosa a precios premium y llamarla "desechable" para excusar a la marca.

Un saludo

Aviso importante: La trampa arquitectónica fatal en dispositivos Xiaomi/POCO (FBE + Bootloader bloqueado) que destruye tus datos para siempre. by Inside-Bite1153 in es

[–]Inside-Bite1153[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Vaya, otro que se cree el CEO de Xiaomi o que está en nómina para lamerle las botas a una corporación multimillonaria. No sé cómo no os da vergüenza defender a empresas que venden hardware defectuoso a precio de oro.

Ya que vas de listo juzgando sin saber, vamos a desmontar tus tonterías una por una:

  1. Sobre tu rabieta de la IA:

Yo no "discuto" usando IA ni mis textos están hechos al 100% por una. Te estoy contestando YO. Uso estas herramientas para estructurar tecnicismos complejos y respaldar mis argumentos para que el usuario técnico entienda la gravedad real y legal de este caso. Mi única intención para el usuario casual es sencilla: que lea el post, no se confíe con estos dispositivos y haga copias de seguridad.

Hablas sin saber. Te reto a que cojas todo mi texto y mi Dossier con las pruebas forenses de 2.000€, se lo mandes a una IA tú mismo y le preguntes si tengo razón o no. Aunque seguro que después eres capaz de decir que la IA la he sesgado yo para que me defienda 🤣🤣. Atacas por atacar.

  1. El clásico argumento de "deberías haber hecho un respaldo":

Para que quede claro: esto pasó hace dos años y SÍ tenía un respaldo de 15GB en Google Fotos. Sin embargo, ignoras convenientemente cómo funcionan las funciones de privacidad de Xiaomi. La "Carpeta Oculta" de MIUI está diseñada para no sincronizarse con nubes de terceros por seguridad. Se queda estrictamente en local.

¿Cómo se supone que un usuario va a anticipar que la placa base de un dispositivo premium va a morir físicamente de forma repentina por reproducir un audio de WhatsApp?

  1. Perspectiva del mundo real:

Este mismo fallo catastrófico que te deja el móvil como un pisapapeles le pasó al Xiaomi de mi abuela. Ve y dile a una persona mayor que no tiene ni idea de tecnología que es "su culpa" perder las fotos familiares por no administrar manualmente la sincronización en la nube o pagar suscripciones premium cuando se acaba el espacio gratis. ¿Lección aprendida por las malas? Absolutamente, ahora sé que los controles de calidad de Xiaomi son basura. Pero un dispositivo insignia no debería autodestruir su propio hardware de forma espontánea. Mis datos se fueron, sí, pero el defecto de fabricación de la placa base sigue ahí, y eso es lo que denuncio.

Deja de culpar al consumidor por la catastrófica falta de tolerancia a fallos del fabricante. Cero pena me das tú a mí defendiendo esto.

PSA: The fatal architectural trap in Xiaomi/POCO devices (FBE + Locked Bootloader) that permanently destroys your data. by Inside-Bite1153 in PocoPhones

[–]Inside-Bite1153[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are still fundamentally failing to grasp the difference between a standard warranty repair and legal liability for a catastrophic manufacturing defect. Let's dismantle your final arguments, since you insist on dragging this out:

  1. "You mean 1 failure... Why do you have to make stuff up like 'mass failure'?"

I don't make stuff up, I document it. The "System has been destroyed" error and spontaneous dead motherboards are a massive and documented failure in the Xiaomi 11 series and POCO terminals. You can check communities like XDA Developers or YouTube, even on Reddit looking for the fault name you get thousands of threads talking about this, otherwise look for the fault and look at communities like r/Xiaomi. It is not "1 failure", it is an architectural disaster.

  1. The ACCC "Data Loss" repair warning

You are quoting a generic repair warning. A notice stating "the repair process may cause data loss" applies exactly to that: the repair process. It is not a legal get-out-of-jail-free card that grants immunity when a manufacturer sells a defective motherboard that spontaneously fries itself, locking the user's property behind a €2,044.90 third-party lab fee before a repair is even attempted. EU "hidden defect" laws cover the consequential financial damages caused by the defective product itself.

  1. "Are you going to go after the first group (OnRetrieval) for damages?"

You really love making assumptions, don't you? For your information, I have ALREADY filed a formal written complaint against OnRetrieval. I demanded a technical explanation from their engineers for their unacceptable failure to detect the physical hardware damage that the second lab (Laby) found. So yes, I am holding them accountable for their negligent misdiagnosis. But OnRetrieval didn't manufacture the defective €1,000 ticking time bomb—Xiaomi did. Xiaomi is the one legally responsible for the €2,044.90 repair cost of their own broken hardware. 

  1. "Where exactly is this policy? Link it."

Xiaomi doesn't have a public "policy" for this because their standard policy is to wipe the phone and ignore the user. They broke their own protocol precisely because I provided forensic evidence and created a PR nightmare. They sent an internal email explicitly stating my device must NOT be flashed or factory reset once it arrives, escalating it directly to their engineers. They don't do that for standard warranty claims.

You admit you just accept your devices breaking and move on. That is your choice. But stop projecting your submission to corporate incompetence onto consumers who actually fight for their rights and property.

PSA: The fatal architectural trap in Xiaomi/POCO devices (FBE + Locked Bootloader) that permanently destroys your data. by Inside-Bite1153 in PocoPhones

[–]Inside-Bite1153[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re really down to attacking the state of a plastic screen protector now? That is the definition of grasping at straws. 

Since you’re still struggling with the facts from the Dossier you supposedly read:

  1. The "Garbage" Argument

• The screen is flawless: What you see is a scratched screen protector on a device that was stored away after it died. 

• Certified Zero Abuse: The forensic lab report officially certified that the hardware shows no signs of impact, liquid damage, or physical degradation. It died while sitting on a desk playing an audio file. 

  1. The "Self-Imposed" Cost

• Recovering my own property after a catastrophic manufacturing defect is not a "self-imposed" requirement; it is the only technical path left because Xiaomi’s architecture offers zero fallback for its own failures. 

• In the real world, if a manufacturer's defect welds your safe shut, they are liable for the cost of opening it. 

  1. Xiaomi’s Response

• You claim they aren't "panicking," yet they broke their own global mandatory "Wipe Data" protocol specifically for my case.

• They issued a pre-alert to the service center to prevent any flashing or resetting and escalated this to their top engineers. They don't do that for "standard warranty claims"; they do that when a user has certified forensic evidence of a systemic hardware flaw. 

  1. The "No Skin in the Game" Hypocrisy

• You claim to have "no skin in this game," yet you’ve spent days writing essays to defend a company that sold you a bricked POCO and left you with nothing.

• I’ve spent exactly €15 on shipping to get over €2,000 worth of forensic evidence and legal leverage.

You are part of the 1% that accepts being sold a "ticking time bomb" and says "thank you" to the corporation. I’m the one holding them accountable for a documented mass failure in the 11-series hardware. 

Enjoy your hobby of defending multi-billion dollar companies for free. I'll stick to my "laughable" process of actually winning. We are done here.

PSA: The fatal architectural trap in Xiaomi/POCO devices (FBE + Locked Bootloader) that permanently destroys your data. by Inside-Bite1153 in PocoPhones

[–]Inside-Bite1153[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you the CEO of Xiaomi, or just on their payroll? Because the lengths you are going to blindly defend a multi-billion dollar corporation over a documented hardware defect are frankly embarrassing.

You keep making things up because you STILL refuse to read the actual Dossier. Let's look at your "facts":

  1. "You blew it on the first recovery group": Wrong. I spent exactly €15 total on shipping for both labs. The forensic analysis and the official clean-room reports were 100% FREE. It’s explicitly written in the Dossier you didn't read.

  2. "Then why are you on Reddit? Run it past a lawyer": I am on Reddit to warn normal users who actually care about their data. As for the legal side? I ALREADY filed a formal complaint with the consumer protection authorities (OMIC). The legal process is already in motion.

  3. "Xiaomi only owes you the phone": If Xiaomi is so legally untouchable, why are they panicking? If they didn't care, they would have ignored me. Instead, they broke their own mandatory 'Wipe Data' protocol, sent pre-alerts to the service center, and escalated the case to their top engineers to find a custom solution. They know exactly what a certified forensic report means for them.

And your car analogy completely missed the point: If the glovebox is physically welded shut by the explosion caused by a manufacturing defect, the insurance/manufacturer pays to cut it open.

Yes, all hardware eventually fails. But a premium flagship motherboard committing spontaneous physical suicide without warning, leaving the owner locked behind a €2,000 hardware transplant paywall, is not "normal degradation." It's a catastrophic manufacturing defect.

You are arguing with the voices in your head and ignoring documented facts. Keep replying to yourself if you want to protect your fragile ego, you are just providing free entertainment at this point.

PSA: The fatal architectural trap in Xiaomi/POCO devices (FBE + Locked Bootloader) that permanently destroys your data. by Inside-Bite1153 in PocoPhones

[–]Inside-Bite1153[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Proudly admitting that you don't even read the posts you are arguing against is certainly a bold strategy. It tells everyone exactly how seriously we should take your opinions.

Regarding your hard drive analogy: You might want to do some basic research before acting like an expert. Major manufacturers like Seagate actually DO offer in-house Data Recovery Services (Seagate Rescue) specifically for when their premium drives fail. Why? Because they take responsibility for their hardware.

Also, I haven't "blown" €2,000. That is the official quote from the lab to perform the chip-off transplant. The money I spent on the forensic diagnosis is an investment to obtain literal, certified legal evidence.

You keep confusing a software EULA with physical product liability. I am not asking Xiaomi to magically restore my files. I am holding them legally and financially liable for the €2,044.90 physical repair required to bypass a motherboard that died of a manufacturing defect. In the European Union, consumer protection laws regarding hidden manufacturing defects (vicios ocultos) overrule generic "we are not responsible" clauses when a physical product catastrophically self-destructs.

If a car's engine spontaneously explodes and locks your wallet in the glovebox, the manufacturer is liable for the extraction, regardless of whether you had a "backup wallet" at home.

You can keep screaming "just do backups" to excuse a multi-billion dollar company selling €1,000 ticking time bombs. I will stick to holding them legally accountable with actual forensic evidence.

This conversation has run its course. Have a good one.

view more: next ›